toplogo
Kirjaudu sisään

Auto-Train-Once: Controller Network Guided Automatic Network Pruning from Scratch


Keskeiset käsitteet
Auto-Train-Once (ATO) introduces an innovative network pruning algorithm designed to automatically reduce the computational and storage costs of DNNs.
Tiivistelmä
  1. Abstract
    • ATO proposed to eliminate the need for additional fine-tuning steps.
    • Utilizes a controller network to guide pruning operation on ZIGs.
  2. Introduction
    • Large-scale DNNs pose challenges during deployment due to computational and storage overheads.
  3. Proposed Method
    • ATO trains target network under guidance of a controller network.
    • Introduces Zero-Invariant Groups (ZIGs) for structural pruning.
  4. Convergence and Complexity Analysis
    • Theoretical analysis ensures convergence of ATO algorithm.
  5. Experiments
    • Achieves state-of-the-art performance across various model architectures on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet.
edit_icon

Mukauta tiivistelmää

edit_icon

Kirjoita tekoälyn avulla

edit_icon

Luo viitteet

translate_icon

Käännä lähde

visual_icon

Luo miellekartta

visit_icon

Siirry lähteeseen

Tilastot
"Our method achieves 72.02% Top-1 accuracy and 90.19% Top-5 accuracy while the results of other counterparts are below the baseline results." "Under pruned FLOPs of 30%, our algorithm archives the best Top-1 acc compared with other methods."
Lainaukset
"Our solution, Auto-Train-Once (ATO), introduces an innovative network pruning algorithm designed to automatically reduce the computational and storage costs of DNNs." "During the model training phase, a controller network dynamically generates the binary mask to guide the pruning of the target model."

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

by Xidong Wu,Sh... klo arxiv.org 03-25-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.14729.pdf
Auto-Train-Once

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How does ATO compare with traditional manual pruning methods

Auto-Train-Once (ATO) differs from traditional manual pruning methods in several key ways. Firstly, ATO eliminates the need for additional fine-tuning steps by directly training and compressing a general Deep Neural Network (DNN) from scratch. This contrasts with traditional methods that often involve intricate multi-step processes requiring domain-specific expertise. Secondly, ATO utilizes a controller network to dynamically generate binary masks to guide the pruning of the target model. This automated approach streamlines the process and reduces the complexity associated with manually selecting pruning groups. Additionally, ATO incorporates a novel stochastic gradient algorithm that enhances coordination between model training and controller network training, improving overall pruning performance. This dynamic approach allows for more precise selection of structures to prune based on real-time feedback during training. Overall, ATO offers a more efficient and user-friendly alternative to traditional manual pruning methods by automating the process and optimizing performance through dynamic guidance.

What are potential drawbacks or limitations of relying heavily on a controller network for guiding pruning operations

While relying heavily on a controller network for guiding pruning operations can offer significant benefits in terms of automation and optimization, there are potential drawbacks or limitations to consider: Overfitting: Depending too heavily on the controller network could lead to overfitting if it learns patterns specific to certain datasets or architectures. This may limit the generalizability of the pruning strategy across different models or tasks. Complexity: The use of a controller network adds an additional layer of complexity to the overall system architecture. Maintaining and updating this component may require specialized knowledge or resources. Computational Overhead: Training and running a separate controller network alongside the target model can introduce computational overhead, potentially impacting overall efficiency and speed. Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The performance of automatic pruning algorithms like ATO can be sensitive to hyperparameters such as learning rates, regularization coefficients, etc., which may require careful tuning for optimal results.

How might advancements in automatic network pruning impact future developments in machine learning algorithms

Advancements in automatic network pruning have significant implications for future developments in machine learning algorithms: Efficiency: Automatic pruning techniques like ATO streamline model compression processes by eliminating manual intervention requirements. Scalability: As models continue to grow larger and more complex, automatic pruning becomes essential for managing computational resources efficiently. Generalization: By dynamically adapting during training based on real-time feedback from data samples, automatic pruners like ATO have potential applications beyond static manual approaches. 4Interpretability:: Automatic networks provide insights into feature importance within neural networks leading towards better interpretability 5Resource Optimization:: Automated techniques help optimize resource utilization making deep learning models more accessible across various platforms In conclusion advancements in automatic network prunning will play crucial role in shaping future machine learning landscape offering efficient scalable solutions with improved interpretibility
0
star