näkemys - Natural Language Processing - # Event Argument Extraction

Semantic Mention Graph Augmented Model for Document-Level Event Argument Extraction

Q: How can the semantic mention graph be further optimized for more complex documents?

To optimize the semantic mention graph for more complex documents, several strategies can be implemented: Hierarchical Graph Structure: Introduce a hierarchical structure in the graph to capture relationships at different levels of granularity within the document. This will allow for better organization and representation of information. Dynamic Graph Construction: Implement a dynamic approach where the graph is constructed iteratively as new information is processed. This adaptive method can handle evolving contexts in real-time. Attention Mechanisms: Incorporate attention mechanisms to prioritize relevant nodes and edges in the graph, focusing on key entities and their connections within the document. Graph Embeddings: Utilize advanced techniques like node embeddings or edge embeddings to encode richer semantic information into the graph structure, enabling better understanding of complex relationships.

Q: What are the potential limitations or biases that could arise from utilizing a graph-augmented model?

While utilizing a graph-augmented model offers significant advantages, there are potential limitations and biases to consider: Overfitting: The model may overfit to specific patterns present in training data, leading to reduced generalization on unseen data. Biased Representations: Biases present in training data can be amplified by the model, resulting in skewed predictions or reinforcing existing stereotypes. Complexity: The complexity of graphs may introduce challenges related to scalability and computational resources required for processing large amounts of data. Interpretability: Highly intricate graphs might make it challenging to interpret how decisions are made by the model, impacting transparency and trustworthiness.

Q: How might incorporating logical reasoning enhance the interpretability of event extraction models?

Incorporating logical reasoning into event extraction models can enhance interpretability through various means: Rule-Based Constraints: By integrating domain-specific rules or constraints based on logic, models can adhere to predefined guidelines during event extraction tasks, making decisions more transparent and interpretable. Explainable Predictions: Logical reasoning frameworks provide explanations behind each prediction made by considering how evidence aligns with logical rules or principles, offering insights into decision-making processes. Consistency Checks: Logical reasoning enables consistency checks across extracted events within a document or dataset, ensuring coherence and reducing errors caused by inconsistencies. 4Contextual Understanding: Logical reasoning allows models to infer implicit relationships between entities based on contextual cues present in text data, improving overall comprehension and accuracy during event extraction tasks.

Keskeiset käsitteet

Proposing a semantic mention Graph Augmented Model to address independent modeling of entity mentions and document-prompt isolation in Document-Level Event Argument Extraction.

Tiivistelmä

The article introduces a Semantic Mention Graph Augmented Model (GAM) to tackle issues in Document-Level Event Argument Extraction. GAM constructs a semantic mention graph capturing relations within and between documents and prompts. It addresses problems like independent modeling of entity mentions and document-prompt isolation. The model utilizes an ensembled graph transformer module and a graph-augmented encoder-decoder module to handle semantic relations effectively. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of GAM, surpassing baseline methods.

Mukauta tiivistelmää

Kirjoita tekoälyn avulla

Luo viitteet

Käännä lähde

toiselle kielelle

Luo miellekartta

lähdeaineistosta

Siirry lähteeseen

arxiv.org

Tilastot

RAMS dataset comprises 3,993 paragraphs with 139 event types and 65 argument roles.
WikiEvents dataset consists of 246 documents with 50 event types and 59 argument roles.

Lainaukset

"The relevance among entity mentions within the document is crucial but frequently overlooked."
"GAM accurately extracts arguments corresponding to their respective roles using an unfilled prompt p."
"GAM outperforms BART-Gen by 4.17% on the WikiEvents dataset."

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

A Semantic Mention Graph Augmented Model for Document-Level Event Argument Extraction

by Jian Zhang,C... klo arxiv.org 03-18-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.09721.pdf

A Semantic Mention Graph Augmented Model for Document-Level Event Argument Extraction

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How can the semantic mention graph be further optimized for more complex documents?

To optimize the semantic mention graph for more complex documents, several strategies can be implemented:

Hierarchical Graph Structure: Introduce a hierarchical structure in the graph to capture relationships at different levels of granularity within the document. This will allow for better organization and representation of information.
Dynamic Graph Construction: Implement a dynamic approach where the graph is constructed iteratively as new information is processed. This adaptive method can handle evolving contexts in real-time.
Attention Mechanisms: Incorporate attention mechanisms to prioritize relevant nodes and edges in the graph, focusing on key entities and their connections within the document.
Graph Embeddings: Utilize advanced techniques like node embeddings or edge embeddings to encode richer semantic information into the graph structure, enabling better understanding of complex relationships.

What are the potential limitations or biases that could arise from utilizing a graph-augmented model?

While utilizing a graph-augmented model offers significant advantages, there are potential limitations and biases to consider:

Overfitting: The model may overfit to specific patterns present in training data, leading to reduced generalization on unseen data.
Biased Representations: Biases present in training data can be amplified by the model, resulting in skewed predictions or reinforcing existing stereotypes.
Complexity: The complexity of graphs may introduce challenges related to scalability and computational resources required for processing large amounts of data.
Interpretability: Highly intricate graphs might make it challenging to interpret how decisions are made by the model, impacting transparency and trustworthiness.

How might incorporating logical reasoning enhance the interpretability of event extraction models?

Incorporating logical reasoning into event extraction models can enhance interpretability through various means:

Rule-Based Constraints: By integrating domain-specific rules or constraints based on logic, models can adhere to predefined guidelines during event extraction tasks, making decisions more transparent and interpretable.
Explainable Predictions: Logical reasoning frameworks provide explanations behind each prediction made by considering how evidence aligns with logical rules or principles, offering insights into decision-making processes.
Consistency Checks: Logical reasoning enables consistency checks across extracted events within a document or dataset, ensuring coherence and reducing errors caused by inconsistencies.
4Contextual Understanding: Logical reasoning allows models to infer implicit relationships between entities based on contextual cues present in text data, improving overall comprehension and accuracy during event extraction tasks.