Challenging the Two Tower Recommendation Model with One Backpropagation

Keskeiset käsitteet

Challenging the traditional two backpropagation strategy in recommendation models with a novel one backpropagation approach for improved performance.

Tiivistelmä

The content discusses the challenges in traditional two tower recommendation models and introduces a new approach called One Backpropagation. It challenges the equal treatment assumption of users and items in model training and proposes a moving-aggregation strategy for user encoding updates. The paper outlines the structure of two tower recommendation models, focusing on user-item encoding, negative sampling, loss computing, and backpropagation updating. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the One Backpropagation model.

Tilastot

"Experiments on four public datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our model."
"Results indicate better recommendation performance of our OneBP than that of peer algorithms."

Lainaukset

"We propose a moving-aggregation updating strategy to update a user encoding in each training epoch."
"Our OneBP outperforms all kinds of the state-of-the-art competitors."

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

One Backpropagation in Two Tower Recommendation Models

by Erjia Chen,B... klo arxiv.org 03-28-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.18227.pdf

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How does the One Backpropagation approach impact the training efficiency compared to traditional methods

The One Backpropagation approach significantly impacts training efficiency compared to traditional methods by reducing computation overload. By cutting off the backpropagation for user encoding updates and using a moving-aggregation strategy, the model focuses on updating item encodings efficiently. This streamlined approach reduces the computational complexity of the training process, leading to faster convergence and lower resource requirements. As a result, the One Backpropagation model offers improved training efficiency and faster model convergence compared to traditional methods that update both user and item encodings simultaneously.

What potential challenges or limitations could arise from implementing the moving-aggregation strategy for user encoding updates

Implementing the moving-aggregation strategy for user encoding updates in the One Backpropagation model may introduce potential challenges or limitations. One challenge could be related to the selection of the hyperparameter 𝛽, which balances the weight between the user encoding from the previous iteration and the updated item encoding. Choosing an inappropriate value for 𝛽 could lead to suboptimal user encoding updates, affecting the overall model performance. Additionally, the moving-aggregation strategy may require careful tuning and experimentation to ensure that it effectively captures the diverse interests of users across different item types.
Another limitation could arise from the assumption that user interests are adequately represented by the interacted items in each training epoch. If a user's preferences change over time or if certain items are not representative of the user's overall interests, the moving-aggregation strategy may not capture these nuances effectively. This could result in suboptimal user representations and impact the recommendation quality of the model.

How might the concept of latent types in items influence the effectiveness of the One Backpropagation model

The concept of latent types in items can significantly influence the effectiveness of the One Backpropagation model. By considering that items may belong to different latent types based on their intrinsic attributes, the model can learn more nuanced representations of items and capture the diversity of user preferences. This understanding of latent types allows the model to cluster items into distinct categories, enabling more personalized and accurate recommendations.
In the context of the One Backpropagation model, leveraging latent types in items can enhance the training process by ensuring that user representations are updated based on a diverse set of item types. This approach helps prevent user representations from being biased towards a specific type of item, leading to more balanced and comprehensive user profiles. By incorporating latent types, the model can better capture the complexity of user-item interactions and improve the overall recommendation performance.