toplogo
Connexion

Convexity of Lossy Energy Storage Optimization Models


Concepts de base
Lossy energy storage optimization models can be reformulated to ensure convexity, providing feasible and optimal solutions.
Résumé

The content discusses the challenges of optimizing lossy energy storage systems due to nonconvexities. It proposes a reformulation that guarantees convexity, ensuring feasible and optimal solutions. The key insights are:

  • Introduction to the importance of energy storage systems in managing renewable energy variability.
  • Challenges posed by nonidealities leading to nonconvex optimization problems.
  • Strategies like dropping complementarity constraints for convex relaxation.
  • Conditions for exactness of convex relaxation solutions.
  • Reformulation focusing on energy profiles for convex optimization.
  • Sufficient conditions for objective function convexity under the reformulation.
  • Examples illustrating when the composite function is guaranteed to be convex or not.

The content is structured into sections discussing problem formulation, convex reformulation, and conclusion with references provided at the end.

edit_icon

Personnaliser le résumé

edit_icon

Réécrire avec l'IA

edit_icon

Générer des citations

translate_icon

Traduire la source

visual_icon

Générer une carte mentale

visit_icon

Voir la source

Stats
"With the surge in growth of wind and solar energy sources in the power grid, energy storage systems have become increasingly important tools." "To address the problem of infeasibility, there are a number of papers in the literature that provide sufficient conditions for the exactness of the convex relaxation obtained by dropping the complementarity constraints." "In this letter, we take the perspective of a storage owner-operator, and study a class of optimization problems involving the optimal operation of a single lossy energy storage system."
Citations
"Such inefficiencies in the energy storage dynamics are known to result in a nonconvex set of feasible charging and discharging power profiles." "To guarantee exactness of the convex relaxation, these papers provide conditions that depend explicitly on the optimal solution of the relaxed optimization problem." "In this letter, we take the perspective of a storage owner-operator, and study a class of optimization problems involving the optimal operation of a single lossy energy storage system."

Idées clés tirées de

by Feras Al Tah... à arxiv.org 03-22-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.14010.pdf
When are Lossy Energy Storage Optimization Models Convex?

Questions plus approfondies

How can nonidealities in energy storage dynamics impact overall system efficiency?

Nonidealities in energy storage dynamics, such as energy loss during charging or discharging processes, can significantly impact the overall efficiency of a system. These inefficiencies lead to a decrease in the amount of usable energy stored within the system compared to the input energy. As a result, more energy needs to be supplied to compensate for these losses, reducing the effective capacity and performance of the storage system. This reduction in efficiency can lead to increased operational costs, decreased reliability, and lower sustainability of the entire power grid.

What are potential drawbacks or limitations associated with dropping complementarity constraints for convex relaxation?

Dropping complementarity constraints for convex relaxation in optimizing lossy energy storage systems may introduce certain drawbacks or limitations: Infeasible Solutions: One significant drawback is that relaxed optimization models without complementarity constraints may yield solutions that are physically unrealistic or impractical. For instance, simultaneous charging and discharging could occur in solutions obtained from these relaxed models. Loss of Accuracy: By relaxing these constraints, there is a risk of losing accuracy in modeling real-world scenarios where simultaneous charging and discharging are not feasible due to physical limitations. Complexity: The absence of complementarity constraints might increase model complexity by requiring additional checks or post-optimization validations to ensure feasibility. Risk Management: Without enforcing these constraints, there could be challenges related to managing risks associated with improper operation modes that violate physical laws.

How might advancements in battery technology influence future approaches to optimizing lossy energy storage systems?

Advancements in battery technology play a crucial role in shaping future approaches towards optimizing lossy energy storage systems: Increased Efficiency: Improved battery technologies with higher charge/discharge efficiencies will enhance overall system efficiency by minimizing losses during operation. Enhanced Energy Density: Higher-energy density batteries allow for storing more power within limited space requirements, enabling better utilization of available resources. Longer Cycle Life: Batteries with longer cycle lives reduce maintenance costs and provide stable long-term performance for optimized operations over extended periods. Smart Battery Management Systems (BMS): Advanced BMS incorporating AI algorithms enable predictive analytics for optimal scheduling based on historical data and real-time conditions. Integration with Renewable Sources: Enhanced batteries facilitate seamless integration with renewable sources like solar and wind power by providing reliable backup options when renewable generation fluctuates. These advancements collectively contribute towards developing more efficient, reliable, and sustainable strategies for optimizing lossy energy storage systems while meeting evolving demands within modern power grids.
0
star