Idée - Game AI - # Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language Models

Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through an External Thinker Module: A Case Study in the Game of Werewolf

Q: How can the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module be further generalized to apply to a wider range of tasks beyond the Werewolf game?

To generalize the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module for broader tasks, several key considerations can be implemented: Flexible Input Formats: The protocol can be designed to accept a variety of input formats, such as structured data, unstructured text, images, or even audio. This flexibility allows the framework to adapt to different types of tasks and domains. Scalability: The protocol should be scalable to handle large datasets and complex tasks. This can involve efficient data processing techniques, parallel computing capabilities, and optimization for performance. Interpretability: The communication protocol should provide clear and interpretable outputs that can be easily understood by users. This can involve incorporating visualization tools, summary reports, or explanations for the reasoning behind the decisions made by the system. Adaptability: The protocol should be adaptable to different domains and tasks without requiring significant modifications. This can be achieved by designing a modular and extensible framework that can accommodate new features and requirements. Integration with External Systems: The protocol should support seamless integration with external systems, databases, APIs, or other tools that may be necessary for specific tasks. This interoperability enhances the framework's capabilities and versatility. By incorporating these elements into the communication protocol, the framework can be extended to a wider range of tasks and domains beyond the Werewolf game, enabling it to tackle diverse challenges in various fields.

Q: What other complex, multi-faceted domains could benefit from the integration of LLMs and an external reasoning module like the Thinker, and how would the implementation differ?

Several complex domains could benefit from integrating LLMs with an external reasoning module like the Thinker: Medical Diagnosis: LLMs can assist in analyzing patient data and medical literature, while the Thinker module can provide domain-specific medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities. The implementation would involve integrating patient records, medical databases, and diagnostic guidelines to support accurate diagnoses. Financial Analysis: LLMs can process financial reports and market data, while the Thinker module can offer strategic insights and decision-making support based on economic theories and market trends. The implementation would involve integrating financial datasets, market indicators, and risk assessment models. Legal Research: LLMs can review legal documents and case law, while the Thinker module can provide legal reasoning and argumentation support. The implementation would involve integrating legal databases, statutes, and case precedents to assist in legal analysis and decision-making. Supply Chain Management: LLMs can analyze supply chain data and trends, while the Thinker module can offer optimization strategies and risk assessment. The implementation would involve integrating logistics data, inventory management systems, and demand forecasting models to enhance supply chain operations. In these domains, the implementation would differ based on the specific requirements and characteristics of each domain. The Thinker module would need to be tailored to the unique challenges and decision-making processes of the domain, incorporating domain-specific knowledge bases, rules, and optimization techniques to enhance the overall reasoning capabilities of the system. Additionally, the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module would need to be customized to accommodate the domain-specific data formats, tasks, and objectives, ensuring seamless integration and effective collaboration between the two components.

Concepts de base

This paper presents an innovative framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with an external Thinker module to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLM-based agents. The framework forms a reasoning hierarchy where LLMs handle intuitive System-1 tasks, while the Thinker focuses on cognitive System-2 tasks that require complex logical analysis and domain-specific knowledge.

Résumé

The paper introduces a framework that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with an external Thinker module to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLM-based agents. The key highlights are:

The framework separates reasoning tasks into two systems - System-1 handled by LLMs for intuitive tasks, and System-2 handled by the Thinker for complex logical analysis and domain-specific knowledge.
The Thinker module directly harnesses knowledge from databases and employs various optimization techniques, unlike relying on prompt engineering to augment LLMs.
The framework is demonstrated in the context of the 9-player Werewolf game, which demands dual-system reasoning. A communication protocol is designed between LLMs and the Thinker.
The Thinker is trained using data from 18,800 human Werewolf sessions and reinforcement learning techniques.
Experiments show the framework's effectiveness in deductive reasoning, speech generation, and online game evaluation. A fine-tuned 6B LLM integrated with the Thinker outperforms GPT4 in the majority of evaluative scenarios.
The paper also contributes the largest dataset for social deduction games to date.

Personnaliser le résumé

Réécrire avec l'IA

Générer des citations

Traduire la source

Vers une autre langue

Générer une carte mentale

à partir du contenu source

Voir la source

arxiv.org

Stats

"This paper also contributes the largest dataset https://github.com/boluoweifenda/werewolf for social deduction games to date."
"We collected 18,800 real human game sessions and analysed the primary patterns behind human speeches."

Citations

"We distinctly separate reasoning tasks into two systems based on the dual-process theory (Wason & Evans, 1974) and propose an external Thinker module to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLM-based agents."
"Unlike augmenting LLMs with cumbersome prompt engineering, the Thinker is directly optimized with knowledge from databases and trained using supervised and reinforcement learning techniques, thus enhancing the LLM-agent's performance and domain alignment without compromising LLM's generality."

Idées clés tirées de

Enhance Reasoning for Large Language Models in the Game Werewolf

by Shuang Wu,Li... à arxiv.org 04-01-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.02330.pdf

Enhance Reasoning for Large Language Models in the Game Werewolf

Questions plus approfondies

How can the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module be further generalized to apply to a wider range of tasks beyond the Werewolf game?

To generalize the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module for broader tasks, several key considerations can be implemented:

Flexible Input Formats: The protocol can be designed to accept a variety of input formats, such as structured data, unstructured text, images, or even audio. This flexibility allows the framework to adapt to different types of tasks and domains.

Scalability: The protocol should be scalable to handle large datasets and complex tasks. This can involve efficient data processing techniques, parallel computing capabilities, and optimization for performance.

Interpretability: The communication protocol should provide clear and interpretable outputs that can be easily understood by users. This can involve incorporating visualization tools, summary reports, or explanations for the reasoning behind the decisions made by the system.

Adaptability: The protocol should be adaptable to different domains and tasks without requiring significant modifications. This can be achieved by designing a modular and extensible framework that can accommodate new features and requirements.

Integration with External Systems: The protocol should support seamless integration with external systems, databases, APIs, or other tools that may be necessary for specific tasks. This interoperability enhances the framework's capabilities and versatility.

By incorporating these elements into the communication protocol, the framework can be extended to a wider range of tasks and domains beyond the Werewolf game, enabling it to tackle diverse challenges in various fields.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of the dual-system reasoning approach, and how can they be addressed?

The dual-system reasoning approach, while effective in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLM-based agents, may have some limitations and drawbacks:

Complexity: Managing two distinct systems for reasoning can introduce complexity and increase the computational overhead of the framework. This complexity may lead to challenges in system integration and maintenance.

Interpretability: The reasoning processes of the Thinker module may not be easily interpretable to users, making it challenging to understand the decision-making logic behind the system's outputs. This lack of transparency can hinder trust and adoption.

Training Data: The dual-system approach may require a significant amount of labeled data for training both the LLMs and the Thinker module. Acquiring and annotating large datasets can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Overfitting: There is a risk of overfitting the models to specific tasks or domains, especially if the training data is limited or biased. This can result in reduced generalization capabilities and performance on unseen data.

To address these limitations, the following strategies can be implemented:

Simplification: Streamlining the dual-system architecture by optimizing the communication between LLMs and the Thinker module can help reduce complexity and improve efficiency.

Explainability: Incorporating explainable AI techniques to elucidate the reasoning processes of the Thinker module can enhance interpretability and transparency, fostering user trust and understanding.

Data Augmentation: Utilizing data augmentation techniques, transfer learning, or synthetic data generation can help mitigate the need for extensive labeled data and improve model generalization.

Regularization: Implementing regularization techniques, such as dropout, weight decay, or early stopping, can prevent overfitting and enhance the models' robustness to unseen data.

By addressing these limitations through careful design, optimization, and model training strategies, the dual-system reasoning approach can be made more effective and applicable to a wider range of tasks.

What other complex, multi-faceted domains could benefit from the integration of LLMs and an external reasoning module like the Thinker, and how would the implementation differ?

Several complex domains could benefit from integrating LLMs with an external reasoning module like the Thinker:

Medical Diagnosis: LLMs can assist in analyzing patient data and medical literature, while the Thinker module can provide domain-specific medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities. The implementation would involve integrating patient records, medical databases, and diagnostic guidelines to support accurate diagnoses.

Financial Analysis: LLMs can process financial reports and market data, while the Thinker module can offer strategic insights and decision-making support based on economic theories and market trends. The implementation would involve integrating financial datasets, market indicators, and risk assessment models.

Legal Research: LLMs can review legal documents and case law, while the Thinker module can provide legal reasoning and argumentation support. The implementation would involve integrating legal databases, statutes, and case precedents to assist in legal analysis and decision-making.

Supply Chain Management: LLMs can analyze supply chain data and trends, while the Thinker module can offer optimization strategies and risk assessment. The implementation would involve integrating logistics data, inventory management systems, and demand forecasting models to enhance supply chain operations.

In these domains, the implementation would differ based on the specific requirements and characteristics of each domain. The Thinker module would need to be tailored to the unique challenges and decision-making processes of the domain, incorporating domain-specific knowledge bases, rules, and optimization techniques to enhance the overall reasoning capabilities of the system. Additionally, the communication protocol between LLMs and the Thinker module would need to be customized to accommodate the domain-specific data formats, tasks, and objectives, ensuring seamless integration and effective collaboration between the two components.