toplogo
Bejelentkezés

Interacting with Explanations to Improve Deep Neural Networks in Scientific Research


Alapfogalmak
XIL allows scientists to interactively revise deep learning models, improving trust and performance by correcting "Clever Hans" moments.
Kivonat

In the study, XIL was introduced to address issues of confounding factors in deep neural networks. By involving scientists in the training loop to provide feedback on explanations, XIL helps improve model trustworthiness and accuracy. The research demonstrates the importance of interactive learning frameworks like XIL in scientific endeavors, particularly in plant phenotyping tasks. Through experiments and user studies, the study highlights the significance of explanations in building trust and enhancing machine learning models' capabilities.

edit_icon

Összefoglaló testreszabása

edit_icon

Átírás mesterséges intelligenciával

edit_icon

Hivatkozások generálása

translate_icon

Forrás fordítása

visual_icon

Gondolattérkép létrehozása

visit_icon

Forrás megtekintése

Statisztikák
XIL adds the scientist into the training loop. The dataset consists of 2410 samples with 504 control samples and 1906 inoculated samples. The hyperspectral raw data size was around 4TB before preprocessing. The final data size after preprocessing is 32GB.
Idézetek
"In this work, we introduce the novel learning setting of “explanatory interactive learning” (XIL) and illustrate its benefits on a plant phenotyping research task." "Our experimental results demonstrate that users care strongly about “Clever Hans”-like moments in machine learning and XIL can help avoiding them."

Mélyebb kérdések

How can XIL be optimized to minimize interaction efforts while maximizing model improvement

To optimize XIL for minimizing interaction efforts while maximizing model improvement, several strategies can be implemented: Optimal Query Strategies: Developing efficient query selection strategies that prioritize informative instances can reduce the number of interactions required to reach an acceptable model state. These strategies should aim to minimize uncertainty and maximize the impact of each labeled instance on improving the model. Active Learning Techniques: Leveraging active learning techniques that focus on selecting instances where the model is uncertain or likely wrong can help in reducing unnecessary interactions. By strategically choosing which instances to label, the overall interaction effort can be minimized. Regret Bounds from Co-active Learning: Exploring regret bounds from co-active learning approaches can provide insights into balancing informativeness with user satisfaction during interactions. This approach aims to optimize the trade-off between query informativeness and user feedback effectiveness. Feedback Mechanisms: Implementing effective feedback mechanisms that allow users to provide corrections or guidance based on explanations can streamline the interaction process. Clear and intuitive interfaces for providing feedback can enhance user engagement and facilitate quicker revisions of the model. By incorporating these optimization strategies, XIL can effectively minimize interaction efforts while maximizing model improvement through targeted and efficient user interactions.

What are the potential implications of relying on explanations for trust development in machine learning models

Relying on explanations for trust development in machine learning models has significant implications for both users and developers: Transparency and Accountability: Providing explanations helps users understand how a machine learning model arrives at its decisions, increasing transparency in AI systems. This transparency fosters accountability as users are more informed about why certain predictions are made. Trust Building: Explanations play a crucial role in building trust between users and machine learning models by offering insights into decision-making processes. When users have visibility into how models work, they are more likely to trust their predictions and recommendations. Error Detection and Correction: Explanations enable users to identify errors or biases in machine learning models' reasoning processes, allowing for corrective actions when necessary. Users can detect "Clever Hans" moments where models make accurate predictions for incorrect reasons, leading to improved performance over time. 4Ethical Considerations: Relying on explanations promotes ethical AI practices by empowering users to assess whether a model's decisions align with ethical standards or societal norms.

How can XIL be extended to incorporate alternative explanations or multiple modalities for improved interpretability

Extending XIL to incorporate alternative explanations or multiple modalities enhances interpretability by providing diverse perspectives on model decisions: 1Alternative Explanations: Introducing alternative explanation methods such as contrastive examples, feature ranking techniques, or adversarial testing allows users to evaluate different rationales behind a model's predictions. 2Multiple Modalities: Incorporating multiple modalities like text-based descriptions, visual heatmaps (e.g., grad-Cam), audio interpretations (for speech recognition tasks), etc., offers comprehensive insights into how different data types influence a model's outputs. 3Counterfactuals: Including counterfactual explanations—hypothetical scenarios showing what changes would lead to different outcomes—can aid in understanding causal relationships within complex models. By expanding XIL with these extensions, stakeholders gain richer insights into ML models' inner workings across various dimensions,making them more trustworthy,reliable,and interpretable..
0
star