wawasan - Control Systems - # CCM Extension to Lie Groups

Control Contraction Metrics on Lie Groups: Extending to Nonlinear Systems

Q: How can the extension of CCM to Lie groups impact real-world control applications

The extension of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM) to Lie groups can have a significant impact on real-world control applications, particularly in systems that evolve on manifolds like robotic models or vehicles with rigid body structures. By extending CCM to Lie groups, which are often represented as matrix Lie groups multiplied by vector spaces, the approach becomes applicable to a broader range of control systems. This extension allows for the analysis and design of controllers for complex systems with Lie group structures, providing a framework to analyze stability and dynamical behavior effectively. In practical terms, this extension enables the development of more robust and efficient control strategies for systems operating on Lie groups. It opens up possibilities for universal tracking control and stabilization of nonlinear systems evolving on these manifolds. By formulating sufficient conditions for the existence of CCMs on Lie groups and designing associated controllers based on convex optimization techniques, engineers can enhance the performance and reliability of control systems in various domains such as robotics, motion planning, adaptive control, and model predictive control.

Q: What are potential limitations or challenges when applying convexified conditions to numerical implementations

When applying convexified conditions to numerical implementations in the context of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM), there are potential limitations or challenges that need to be considered: Computational Burden: Convexifying conditions may not eliminate all computational complexities involved in finding suitable metrics or controllers. While it simplifies certain aspects by turning them into convex problems, there could still be heavy computational burdens when dealing with high-dimensional spaces or intricate system dynamics. Dimensionality Issues: In some cases where the dimensionality of the manifold is significantly smaller than that of its embedding space (as seen in many practical scenarios), unnecessary computations may arise due to working with higher-dimensional matrices than required. This mismatch can lead to inefficiencies in computation. Global vs Local Solutions: The nature of convexified conditions may limit their applicability globally across all points on a manifold. Finding solutions locally might be more feasible but could restrict the generalizability or universality of controller designs across different regions within the manifold. Numerical Stability: Implementing numerical methods based on convexified conditions requires attention to numerical stability issues during computation processes such as solving differential equations or optimizing over metric spaces. Addressing these limitations involves careful consideration during implementation phases while leveraging advancements in computational tools and algorithms tailored for handling complex geometric structures efficiently.

Q: How can the intrinsic treatment of CCM on abstract manifolds contribute to advanced control strategies beyond traditional systems

The intrinsic treatment of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM) on abstract manifolds offers opportunities for advancing control strategies beyond traditional systems by providing a theoretical framework that transcends specific geometrical representations: Generalization Across Manifold Types: By treating CCM intrinsically without relying heavily on explicit embeddings into Euclidean spaces, researchers can apply these concepts across diverse types of manifolds beyond standard matrix Lie groups commonly encountered in controls literature. Advanced Geometric Control Techniques: Abstract manifold treatments allow for exploring advanced geometric control techniques applicable to non-standard geometries where conventional approaches might not directly apply. 3..Enhanced Theoretical Understanding: Studying CCM intrinsically provides deeper insights into fundamental principles governing system stability and feedback design irrespective -of specific coordinate choices or local parametrizations. 4..Interdisciplinary Applications: The intrinsic treatment opens avenues for interdisciplinary applications where abstract mathematical frameworks intersect with fields like machine learning, -robotics,and artificial intelligence requiring sophisticated nonlinear feedback mechanisms. By delving into abstract manifolds using intrinsic approaches,CMM contributes towards developing cutting-edge methodologies capable of addressing complex challenges posed by modern dynamic systemsacross various scientific disciplines

Konsep Inti

Extending the Control Contraction Metrics approach to Lie groups provides a framework for analyzing control systems with manifold structures.

Abstrak

The paper extends the Control Contraction Metrics (CCM) approach to Lie groups, viewing manifolds as constrained sets. It formulates conditions for CCM existence and controller design, demonstrating applicability in various domains. The content is structured into sections covering general results, convexified conditions, CCM application on Lie groups, and treatment of abstract manifolds. Detailed mathematical derivations and examples illustrate the theoretical concepts presented.

I. INTRODUCTION

Contraction analysis overview.
Application of CCM in nonlinear control synthesis.
Recent developments in contraction analysis.

II. PRELIMINARIES

Variational dynamics calculation.
Design of tracking controller using CCM approach.
Formulation of sufficient conditions for CCM existence.

III. CONTROL CONTRACTION METRICS ON LIE GROUPS

A. General results

Formulation of CCM on embedded submanifolds.
Characterization of CCM search by convex conditions.

B. Convexified conditions

Modification of conditions for numerical implementation ease.
Application to systems evolved on Lie groups.

C. CCM on Lie groups

Illustrative case study with O(2) × R as an example.

D. More abstract manifolds

Intrinsic treatment of CCM on abstract manifolds.
Convexification via musical isomorphism.

IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS

Summary of extending CCM to Lie groups.
Future directions for practical system trajectory tracking.

Kustomisasi Ringkasan

Tulis Ulang dengan AI

Buat Sitasi

Terjemahkan Sumber

Ke Bahasa Lain

Buat Peta Pikiran

dari konten sumber

Kunjungi Sumber

arxiv.org

Statistik

"This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 834142 (ScalableControl)."
"Dongjun Wu is with Department of Automatic Control, Lund University, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden dongjun.wu@control.lth.se."
"B. Yi is with Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada bowen.yi@polymtl.ca."
"I.R.Manchester is with Australian Centre for Robotics and School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia ian.manchester@sydney.edu.au."

Kutipan

Wawasan Utama Disaring Dari

Control contraction metrics on Lie groups

by Dongjun Wu,B... pada arxiv.org 03-25-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15264.pdf

Control contraction metrics on Lie groups

Pertanyaan yang Lebih Dalam

How can the extension of CCM to Lie groups impact real-world control applications

The extension of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM) to Lie groups can have a significant impact on real-world control applications, particularly in systems that evolve on manifolds like robotic models or vehicles with rigid body structures. By extending CCM to Lie groups, which are often represented as matrix Lie groups multiplied by vector spaces, the approach becomes applicable to a broader range of control systems. This extension allows for the analysis and design of controllers for complex systems with Lie group structures, providing a framework to analyze stability and dynamical behavior effectively.
In practical terms, this extension enables the development of more robust and efficient control strategies for systems operating on Lie groups. It opens up possibilities for universal tracking control and stabilization of nonlinear systems evolving on these manifolds. By formulating sufficient conditions for the existence of CCMs on Lie groups and designing associated controllers based on convex optimization techniques, engineers can enhance the performance and reliability of control systems in various domains such as robotics, motion planning, adaptive control, and model predictive control.

What are potential limitations or challenges when applying convexified conditions to numerical implementations

When applying convexified conditions to numerical implementations in the context of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM), there are potential limitations or challenges that need to be considered:

Computational Burden: Convexifying conditions may not eliminate all computational complexities involved in finding suitable metrics or controllers. While it simplifies certain aspects by turning them into convex problems, there could still be heavy computational burdens when dealing with high-dimensional spaces or intricate system dynamics.

Dimensionality Issues: In some cases where the dimensionality of the manifold is significantly smaller than that of its embedding space (as seen in many practical scenarios), unnecessary computations may arise due to working with higher-dimensional matrices than required. This mismatch can lead to inefficiencies in computation.

Global vs Local Solutions: The nature of convexified conditions may limit their applicability globally across all points on a manifold. Finding solutions locally might be more feasible but could restrict the generalizability or universality of controller designs across different regions within the manifold.

Numerical Stability: Implementing numerical methods based on convexified conditions requires attention to numerical stability issues during computation processes such as solving differential equations or optimizing over metric spaces.

Addressing these limitations involves careful consideration during implementation phases while leveraging advancements in computational tools and algorithms tailored for handling complex geometric structures efficiently.

How can the intrinsic treatment of CCM on abstract manifolds contribute to advanced control strategies beyond traditional systems

The intrinsic treatment of Control Contraction Metrics (CCM) on abstract manifolds offers opportunities for advancing control strategies beyond traditional systems by providing a theoretical framework that transcends specific geometrical representations:


Generalization Across Manifold Types: By treating CCM intrinsically without relying heavily on explicit embeddings into Euclidean spaces, researchers can apply these concepts across diverse types of manifolds beyond standard matrix Lie groups commonly encountered in controls literature.


Advanced Geometric Control Techniques: Abstract manifold treatments allow for exploring advanced geometric control techniques applicable to non-standard geometries where conventional approaches might not directly apply.


3..Enhanced Theoretical Understanding: Studying CCM intrinsically provides deeper insights into fundamental principles governing system stability and feedback design irrespective
-of specific coordinate choices or local parametrizations.
4..Interdisciplinary Applications: The intrinsic treatment opens avenues for interdisciplinary applications where abstract mathematical frameworks intersect with fields like machine learning,
-robotics,and artificial intelligence requiring sophisticated nonlinear feedback mechanisms.
By delving into abstract manifolds using intrinsic approaches,CMM contributes towards developing cutting-edge methodologies capable
of addressing complex challenges posed by modern dynamic systemsacross various scientific disciplines