Investigating the Performance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Fine-Tuning for AI-Driven Knowledge-Based Systems

Core Concepts

Retrieval-Augmented Generation outperforms Fine-Tuning for developing G-LLM-based knowledge systems.

Abstract

The study compares Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Fine-Tuning (FN) techniques for G-LLM models. RAG-based constructions show higher efficiency than FN models, with a 16% better ROUGE score, 15% better BLEU score, and 53% better cosine similarity. The study highlights challenges in connecting FN with RAG due to potential performance decreases. It emphasizes the advantages of RAG over FN in terms of hallucination and creativity. The research explores data preparation methods, model selection criteria, metric evaluation strategies, and training settings for both approaches.

Stats

Based on measurements shown on different datasets, we demonstrate that RAG-based constructions are more efficient than models produced with FN.
Outperforms the FN models by 16% in terms of the ROGUE score, 15% in the case of the BLEU score, and 53% based on the cosine similarity.
The average 8% better METEOR score of FN models indicates greater creativity compared to RAG.

Quotes

"Connecting FN models with RAG can cause a decrease in performance."
"RAG significantly improves hallucination compared to fine-tuned models."
"The best result was obtained using RAG Llama-2-7b base model with indexed datasets."

Key Insights Distilled From

Investigating the performance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation and fine-tuning for the development of AI-driven knowledge-based systems

by Robert Lakat... at arxiv.org 03-18-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.09727.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the challenges in connecting FN with RAG be overcome to achieve optimal performance?

In order to overcome the challenges in connecting Fine-Tuning (FN) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for optimal performance, several strategies can be implemented:

Dataset Preparation: Ensuring that the datasets used for both FN and RAG are compatible and aligned is crucial. This involves creating high-quality question-answer pairs for FN and well-indexed databases for RAG.

Threshold Optimization: Finding the right threshold value when using a semantic search engine in RAG is essential. This threshold determines what information is considered relevant during the search process. Experimenting with different threshold values can help identify the optimal setting.

Context Injection: Properly injecting context into G-LLMs during RAG plays a significant role in achieving success. The context provided should be accurate, relevant, and of suitable length to enhance model understanding and response generation.

Model Selection: Choosing the appropriate base model for RAG is critical as not all models may perform equally well with this technique. Models like LlaMA-2-7b have shown promising results, indicating that selecting a suitable base model can impact overall performance.

Evaluation Metrics: Utilizing a combination of evaluation metrics such as ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR scores, and cosine similarity helps assess the effectiveness of both FN and RAG approaches accurately.

By addressing these key areas through meticulous planning, experimentation, and optimization, it is possible to bridge FN with RAG effectively to maximize their combined potential in developing AI-driven knowledge systems.

How might advancements in G-LLMs impact other fields beyond natural language processing?

The advancements in Generative Large Language Models (G-LLMs) have far-reaching implications beyond natural language processing:

Healthcare: G-LLMs could revolutionize healthcare by assisting medical professionals in diagnosing diseases based on symptoms or medical records more efficiently.

Finance: In finance, G-LLMs could aid in risk assessment modeling by analyzing vast amounts of financial data quickly and accurately.

Education: These models could personalize learning experiences by generating tailored educational content based on individual student needs.

4....