Core Concepts
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit moral inconsistency, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods.
Abstract
Recent advancements in LLMs showcase impressive capabilities in conversational systems.
Despite this, state-of-the-art LLMs are morally inconsistent, raising concerns about their reliability.
The article introduces SaGE, an information-theoretic measure, to assess LLMs' moral consistency.
The Moral Consistency Corpus (MCC) is constructed to evaluate LLMs' responses in moral scenarios.
Results show that task accuracy and consistency are independent issues, emphasizing the need for further investigation.
Stats
대규모 언어 모델은 도덕적 일관성을 보여주지 않음.
SaGE는 정보 이론적 측정 방법으로 LLM의 도덕적 일관성을 평가하는 데 사용됨.
Moral Consistency Corpus (MCC)는 LLM의 도덕적 일관성을 평가하기 위해 구축됨.
Quotes
"Large Language Models are morally inconsistent in their generations."
"Task accuracy and consistency are independent problems."