Deriving Adaptive Kalman Filters from Recursive Least Squares Forgetting Algorithms

Core Concepts

This work presents a Kalman filter least squares (KFLS) cost function whose recursive minimizer gives the Kalman filter update equations. It is shown that various extensions of recursive least squares (RLS) from the literature are special cases of the Kalman filter, motivating the development of a new class of adaptive Kalman filters that incorporate forgetting from RLS extensions.

Abstract

The paper begins by deriving the Kalman filter least squares (KFLS) cost function, whose recursive minimizer gives the Kalman filter update equations. This is done by extending the generalized forgetting recursive least squares (GF-RLS) framework, which contains various RLS extensions as special cases. The key insights are: RLS extensions that are special cases of GF-RLS are also special cases of the Kalman filter, with a particular choice of the process noise covariance matrix. This connection motivates the development of a new class of adaptive Kalman filters, where the prior covariance update equation is modified to incorporate forgetting from RLS extensions. A numerical example is provided, showing that an adaptive Kalman filter using the robust variable forgetting factor algorithm can improve state estimation for a mass-spring-damper system with intermittent, unmodeled collisions. The paper concludes that such adaptive Kalman filtering may provide potential benefits for systems with non-classical disturbances.

Stats

None.

Quotes

None.

Key Insights Distilled From

Adaptive Kalman Filtering Developed from Recursive Least Squares Forgetting Algorithms

by Brian Lai,De... at arxiv.org 04-18-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.10914.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the performance of the proposed adaptive Kalman filters be further improved or extended to handle a wider range of non-classical disturbances

To further enhance the performance of the proposed adaptive Kalman filters and extend their applicability to a broader range of non-classical disturbances, several strategies can be considered: Dynamic Forgetting Factor Adjustment: Implementing a dynamic forgetting factor adjustment mechanism based on the characteristics of the system and the nature of disturbances can improve adaptability. By continuously monitoring the system dynamics and disturbance patterns, the forgetting factor can be adjusted in real-time to optimize performance. Adaptive Noise Covariance Estimation: Incorporating adaptive noise covariance estimation techniques can help in accurately modeling the varying levels of disturbances. By dynamically adjusting the process noise covariance matrix based on the system's behavior, the filter can better adapt to non-classical disturbances. Nonlinear Filtering Techniques: Integrating nonlinear filtering methods, such as particle filters or unscented Kalman filters, alongside the adaptive Kalman filter can enhance robustness against complex and non-Gaussian disturbances. These techniques can handle non-linearities and uncertainties more effectively, providing improved state estimation in challenging scenarios. Machine Learning Integration: Leveraging machine learning algorithms to learn and predict the patterns of non-classical disturbances can further enhance the adaptability of the adaptive Kalman filter. By training models on historical data, the filter can anticipate and mitigate the impact of disturbances proactively. Sensor Fusion: Implementing sensor fusion techniques to combine data from multiple sensors can improve the filter's resilience to disturbances. By integrating information from diverse sources, the filter can enhance accuracy and reliability in estimating the system's state under varying disturbance conditions.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of incorporating RLS forgetting algorithms into the Kalman filter framework

Incorporating RLS forgetting algorithms into the Kalman filter framework introduces certain drawbacks and limitations that need to be considered: Increased Computational Complexity: The integration of RLS forgetting algorithms may lead to increased computational complexity, especially in scenarios with high-dimensional state spaces or frequent disturbances. This can impact real-time performance and efficiency, requiring careful optimization strategies. Tuning Sensitivity: The performance of adaptive Kalman filters using RLS forgetting algorithms is highly dependent on the proper tuning of parameters, such as the forgetting factor and noise covariance matrices. Suboptimal tuning can result in instability or subpar filtering performance. Limited Generalization: While RLS forgetting algorithms offer benefits in handling time-varying parameters and disturbances, their applicability may be limited to specific types of disturbances. Generalizing the approach to handle a wide range of non-classical disturbances may require additional modifications or extensions. Robustness Concerns: The reliance on RLS forgetting algorithms for adaptive filtering may introduce vulnerabilities to model inaccuracies or outliers in the data. Ensuring robustness against unexpected disturbances or uncertainties is crucial for maintaining the filter's performance. Memory Requirements: RLS forgetting algorithms may require significant memory resources to store historical data for updating the forgetting factor. Managing memory efficiently and addressing potential memory constraints is essential for practical implementation.

How can the insights from this work be applied to develop adaptive filtering techniques for other state estimation problems beyond the Kalman filter, such as particle filters or nonlinear filtering methods

The insights from this work can be leveraged to develop adaptive filtering techniques for other state estimation problems beyond the Kalman filter, such as particle filters or nonlinear filtering methods, in the following ways: Adaptive Particle Filters: By integrating adaptive forgetting mechanisms inspired by RLS algorithms, particle filters can dynamically adjust the particle weights based on the relevance of past observations. This adaptive approach can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of particle filtering in handling non-stationary environments. Nonlinear Adaptive Filters: Extending the concept of adaptive Kalman filters to nonlinear filtering methods like unscented Kalman filters or extended Kalman filters can improve state estimation in nonlinear systems. Incorporating adaptive mechanisms for noise covariance estimation and state prediction can enhance the robustness of nonlinear filters. Machine Learning-Enhanced Filters: Combining adaptive filtering techniques with machine learning models, such as neural networks or reinforcement learning, can enable the development of adaptive filters that learn and adapt to changing environments autonomously. These hybrid approaches can improve state estimation accuracy in complex and dynamic systems. Sensor Fusion with Adaptive Filters: Integrating adaptive filtering techniques with sensor fusion algorithms can enhance the fusion of data from multiple sensors in dynamic environments. By adapting the fusion process based on the reliability and relevance of sensor measurements, the overall estimation accuracy can be improved. Real-Time Adaptive Filtering: Implementing real-time adaptive filtering algorithms that continuously update filter parameters based on the evolving system dynamics can be beneficial for applications requiring rapid adaptation to changing conditions. These adaptive filters can provide accurate and timely state estimates in dynamic and uncertain environments.