toplogo
Sign In

Effective Individual Fairest Community Search over Heterogeneous Information Networks


Core Concepts
The paper proposes the problem of Individual Fairest Community Search (IFCS) over Heterogeneous Information Networks (HINs), which aims to find a set of vertices from the HIN that own the same type, close relationships, and small difference of activity level.
Abstract
The paper introduces the problem of Individual Fairest Community Search (IFCS) over Heterogeneous Information Networks (HINs). The key contributions are: Formalization of the IFCS problem, which considers individual fairness in community search over HINs. The goal is to find a set of vertices with the same type, close relationships, and small difference in activity level. Development of a Filter-Verify algorithm to solve the IFCS problem. The algorithm first filters out unsatisfied vertices, then builds the M-graph and calculates the active level of each vertex. Finally, it identifies the fairest target-aware communities by calculating the fairness score of each weakly connected subgraph in the M-graph. Proposal of an exploration-based filter strategy to reduce the potential target vertices that need to be checked, and a message-passing based optimization strategy to avoid redundant computation. Derivation of a lower bound of the fairness score to prune the unfair communities in advance during the community search process. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrating the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithms, which achieve at least 3 times faster than the baseline solution.
Stats
The paper does not provide any specific numerical data or statistics. It focuses on the algorithmic aspects of the IFCS problem.
Quotes
The paper does not contain any striking quotes that support the key logics.

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed IFCS model be extended to handle dynamic changes in the underlying HIN, such as addition or deletion of vertices and edges

To handle dynamic changes in the underlying HIN, such as addition or deletion of vertices and edges, the proposed IFCS model can be extended by implementing incremental update mechanisms. When a new vertex or edge is added to the HIN, the system can update the candidate regions and 𝐢𝑀-graph accordingly by applying the exploration-based filter to identify the candidate target vertex instances and their 𝑀-connected vertices. Similarly, when a vertex or edge is deleted, the system can remove the corresponding entries from the candidate regions and 𝐢𝑀-graph to ensure the accuracy of the community search results. By incorporating these incremental update strategies, the IFCS model can adapt to dynamic changes in the HIN while maintaining efficiency and accuracy in community search operations.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using the Gini coefficient as the fairness measure, and are there alternative fairness metrics that could be explored

While the Gini coefficient is a widely accepted measure of fairness, it may have limitations in certain scenarios. One potential drawback is that the Gini coefficient focuses on the distribution of active levels among members in a community, which may not capture all aspects of fairness, especially in complex and diverse communities. Alternative fairness metrics that could be explored include entropy-based measures, such as Shannon entropy or Kullback-Leibler divergence, which provide a more nuanced understanding of the distribution of activity levels and can offer insights into the overall fairness of a community. Additionally, metrics based on social network analysis, such as homophily or structural balance theory, could be considered to evaluate fairness in terms of social relationships and interactions within a community.

Can the IFCS problem be formulated and solved in a distributed or parallel computing environment to handle very large-scale HINs

The IFCS problem can be formulated and solved in a distributed or parallel computing environment to handle very large-scale HINs efficiently. By leveraging the parallel processing capabilities of distributed systems, the community search operations can be divided into smaller tasks that can be executed simultaneously on multiple computing nodes. This parallel processing approach can significantly reduce the computational time required to find the fairest communities in large-scale HINs. Additionally, distributed computing frameworks like Apache Spark or Hadoop can be utilized to distribute the workload and optimize the performance of the IFCS algorithm across a cluster of machines. By implementing the IFCS problem in a distributed or parallel computing environment, scalability and efficiency can be improved to handle the complexities of large-scale HINs effectively.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star