toplogo
Sign In

Efficient Initialization of Variable-sized Transformer Models via Stage-wise Weight Sharing


Core Concepts
A simple but effective Learngene approach termed Stage-wise Weight Sharing (SWS) that efficiently initializes variable-sized Transformer models by integrating stage information and expansion guidance into the learned learngenes.
Abstract
The paper proposes a novel Learngene approach called Stage-wise Weight Sharing (SWS) to efficiently initialize variable-sized Transformer models. The key insights are: Integrating stage information into the learned learngene layers is crucial, as it preserves the intrinsic layer connections and provides guidance on how to effectively expand the learngene. The learngene learning process should emulate the expansion process by adding weight-shared layers within each stage, thereby providing clear guidance on how to expand the learngene layers. The SWS approach works as follows: An auxiliary Transformer model (Aux-Net) is designed, comprising multiple stages where the layer weights in each stage are shared. This Aux-Net is trained via distillation from a large well-trained ancestry model (Ans-Net). The well-trained learngene layers containing stage information and expansion guidance are then used to initialize descendant models (Des-Net) of variable depths, fitting diverse resource constraints. The initialized Des-Nets are fine-tuned normally without the restriction of stage-wise weight sharing. Extensive experiments on ImageNet-1K and several downstream datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of SWS. Compared to training from scratch, SWS achieves better performance while reducing huge training costs. When initializing variable-sized models, SWS outperforms existing methods while significantly reducing the parameters stored and pre-training costs.
Stats
The paper reports the following key metrics: On ImageNet-1K, SWS performs better than training from scratch while reducing around 6.6x total training costs. On CIFAR-100, SWS outperforms pre-training and fine-tuning by 1.12%. On Cars-196, SWS surpasses pre-training and fine-tuning by 2.28%. When initializing variable-sized models, SWS reduces around 20x parameters stored and 10x pre-training costs compared to the pre-training and fine-tuning approach.
Quotes
"SWS divides one Transformer into multiple stages and shares the layer weights within each stage during the training process." "Both stage information and expansion guidance are necessary: 1) expanding learngene layers which lacks stage information destroys the intrinsic layer connection. 2) Without expansion guidance, the position of expanded layers remains uncertain." "Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of SWS, e.g., compared to training from scratch, training with compact learngenes can achieve better performance while reducing huge training costs."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the stage-wise weight sharing mechanism be further improved to better capture the hierarchical structure of Transformer models

To further enhance the stage-wise weight sharing mechanism for better capturing the hierarchical structure of Transformer models, several improvements can be considered: Dynamic Weight Sharing: Implement a dynamic weight sharing mechanism where the sharing ratio between layers within each stage can be adjusted during training based on the learning progress. This adaptability can help the model allocate more resources to critical layers or stages as needed. Attention Mechanism: Integrate an attention mechanism into the weight sharing process to allow the model to focus on specific layers or stages based on their importance. This can help prioritize the sharing of weights for more crucial components of the model. Hierarchical Weight Sharing: Implement a hierarchical weight sharing approach where weights are shared not only within stages but also across different hierarchical levels in the model. This can capture the multi-level dependencies present in Transformer architectures more effectively. Regularization Techniques: Incorporate regularization techniques specific to weight sharing, such as group sparsity regularization or structured pruning, to encourage sparse weight sharing patterns that align with the hierarchical structure of the model. By incorporating these enhancements, the stage-wise weight sharing mechanism can be optimized to better capture the hierarchical relationships and dependencies within Transformer models.

What other types of model architectures beyond Transformers could benefit from the learngene initialization approach proposed in this paper

The learngene initialization approach proposed in the paper can benefit various model architectures beyond Transformers, especially those with modular and hierarchical structures. Some of the model architectures that could benefit from learngene initialization include: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): GNNs often consist of multiple layers with complex inter-layer dependencies. Learngene initialization can help in capturing the underlying graph structure and initializing GNNs for improved performance. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs): RNNs have sequential dependencies between hidden states across layers. Learngene initialization can assist in capturing long-term dependencies and initializing RNNs more effectively. Capsule Networks: Capsule Networks involve nested layers of capsules representing different parts of an input. Learngene initialization can aid in initializing capsule networks by capturing the relationships between capsules. Sparse Neural Networks: Sparse neural networks have a structured architecture with specific connectivity patterns. Learngene initialization can help in initializing sparse networks efficiently by leveraging the learned sparse representations. By applying the learngene initialization strategy to these model architectures, it is possible to achieve better initialization, faster convergence, and improved performance across a wide range of tasks.

Can the learngene initialization strategy be combined with other model compression techniques, such as knowledge distillation or pruning, to achieve even more efficient model initialization and deployment

The learngene initialization strategy can be effectively combined with other model compression techniques, such as knowledge distillation and pruning, to achieve even more efficient model initialization and deployment. Here are some ways to integrate learngene initialization with these techniques: Knowledge Distillation: Incorporate knowledge distillation during the learngene learning process to transfer knowledge from a larger pretrained model to the compact learngene. This can help in distilling the essential information from the pretrained model into the learngene for more efficient initialization. Pruning: Use pruning techniques after initializing the model with learngene to further reduce the model size and computational complexity. Pruning can help in removing unnecessary connections or parameters while retaining the learned knowledge from the initialization phase. Quantization: Apply quantization methods to the initialized model to reduce the precision of weights and activations, leading to further compression and faster inference. Quantization can be combined with learngene initialization to achieve a compact and efficient model deployment. Sparse Initialization: Utilize sparse initialization techniques in conjunction with learngene initialization to initialize sparse neural networks. Sparse initialization can help in creating sparse connections based on the learned knowledge from the learngene, leading to more parameter-efficient models. By combining learngene initialization with these model compression techniques, it is possible to create highly efficient and compact models that maintain performance while reducing computational costs and memory requirements.
0