toplogo
Sign In

Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning through Self-Play in Adversarial Taboo Games


Core Concepts
Self-play training of large language models (LLMs) in an adversarial language game called Adversarial Taboo can significantly improve their reasoning abilities across a broad range of benchmarks.
Abstract
The authors explore a novel training strategy called Self-Play learning in Adversarial language Game (SPAG) to improve the reasoning capacity of LLMs. The key steps are: Imitation Learning: The authors first enable open-source LLMs like LLaMA-2-7B and Baichuan-2-13B to behave correctly in the Adversarial Taboo game by conducting imitation learning on self-play episodes collected from GPT-4. Self-Play and Reinforcement Learning: The LLMs then play the Adversarial Taboo game against copies of themselves. The game outcomes are used to update the LLM policies via reinforcement learning, with a focus on selecting winning episodes. Iterative Self-Play: The authors repeat the self-play and reinforcement learning process for three epochs, observing continuous and uniform improvements in the LLMs' reasoning performance on various benchmarks, including BBH, ARC, Mutual, and MMLU. The authors claim that the major contribution to the reasoning improvements comes from the self-play and reinforcement learning scheme, rather than just the supervised fine-tuning on additional data. They also demonstrate that the SPAG-trained LLMs can outperform their counterparts in direct game-playing against GPT-4.
Stats
The authors report the following key metrics: LLaMA-2-7B base model MMLU score: 45.80 Baichuan-2-13B base model MMLU score: 59.00 Geometric mean of reasoning benchmark scores for LLaMA-2-7B SPAG-3: 52.58 Geometric mean of reasoning benchmark scores for Baichuan-2-13B SPAG-3: 56.75
Quotes
"Self-play training of large language models (LLMs) in an adversarial language game called Adversarial Taboo can significantly improve their reasoning abilities across a broad range of benchmarks." "The major contribution to the reasoning improvements comes from the self-play and reinforcement learning scheme, rather than just the supervised fine-tuning on additional data."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Pengyu Cheng... at arxiv.org 04-17-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.10642.pdf
Self-playing Adversarial Language Game Enhances LLM Reasoning

Deeper Inquiries

How can the Adversarial Taboo game be further extended or modified to target specific reasoning skills or knowledge domains

The Adversarial Taboo game can be extended or modified to target specific reasoning skills or knowledge domains by introducing variations in the game rules and objectives. For example: Specialized Topics: The game can be tailored to focus on specific knowledge domains such as science, history, or literature. Players could be required to engage in conversations related to these topics, testing their understanding and reasoning abilities in those areas. Complex Reasoning: Introduce more complex rules that require players to engage in multi-step reasoning or logical deduction. This could involve solving puzzles, making inferences, or drawing conclusions based on limited information. Debate Format: Transform the game into a debate-style format where players must argue their points of view while countering their opponent's arguments. This would test their ability to construct coherent arguments and counterarguments. Collaborative Play: Instead of a competitive setup, the game could be modified to encourage collaboration between players to achieve a common goal. This would assess their ability to work together and communicate effectively. By customizing the game mechanics and objectives, Adversarial Taboo can be adapted to target specific reasoning skills or knowledge domains, providing a more focused and targeted training environment for LLMs.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of the SPAG approach, and how could they be addressed in future work

The SPAG approach, while effective in enhancing LLM reasoning abilities, may have some limitations and drawbacks that could be addressed in future work: Sample Efficiency: The self-play process in SPAG requires a large number of interactions to generate meaningful training data, which can be computationally expensive. Future work could explore more efficient sampling strategies to reduce the computational cost. Generalization: The improvements seen in reasoning benchmarks may not always translate to real-world applications or diverse language tasks. Future research could focus on evaluating the generalization of SPAG-trained models across a wider range of tasks and datasets. Bias Amplification: If the initial LLM model has biases or incorrect knowledge, the self-play process in SPAG could reinforce and amplify these biases. Future work could incorporate mechanisms to mitigate bias amplification during training. Evaluation Metrics: The evaluation of SPAG models primarily focuses on reasoning benchmarks and game win rates. Future work could include a more comprehensive evaluation framework that considers a broader range of language capabilities and real-world performance metrics. By addressing these limitations and drawbacks, future iterations of the SPAG approach can further enhance the effectiveness and applicability of LLM training for advanced reasoning tasks.

Could the self-play and reinforcement learning principles used in SPAG be applied to other types of language tasks or games beyond Adversarial Taboo to drive more general improvements in LLM capabilities

The principles of self-play and reinforcement learning used in SPAG can be applied to other types of language tasks or games beyond Adversarial Taboo to drive more general improvements in LLM capabilities. Some potential applications include: Question-Answering Games: Designing games where LLMs engage in question-answering tasks, requiring them to provide accurate and relevant responses to a variety of queries. Self-play can help improve the LLM's ability to understand and generate informative answers. Dialogue Systems: Creating conversational games where LLMs simulate interactions with users, focusing on maintaining coherent dialogues and providing helpful responses. Self-play can enhance the LLM's conversational abilities and natural language understanding. Text Generation Challenges: Developing games that challenge LLMs to generate creative and contextually relevant text, such as storytelling or poetry generation tasks. Self-play can refine the LLM's language generation skills and creativity. Language Translation Games: Implementing games that test the LLM's translation capabilities by requiring it to accurately translate text between different languages. Self-play can improve the LLM's translation accuracy and fluency. By applying self-play and reinforcement learning principles to a diverse set of language tasks and games, LLMs can undergo comprehensive training that enhances their overall language capabilities and performance across various domains.
0