toplogo
Sign In

Enhancing Robustness of NVCIM DNN Accelerators through Negative Feedback Training


Core Concepts
Negative Feedback Training (NFT) is a novel concept that leverages multi-scale noisy information captured from the network to enhance the robustness of DNN models against device variations in NVCIM DNN accelerators.
Abstract
The paper introduces a novel training concept called Negative Feedback Training (NFT) to improve the robustness of DNN models against device variations in NVCIM (Non-Volatile Computing-In-Memory) DNN accelerators. The key insights are: Existing noise-injection training methods suffer from limited accuracy improvement, reduced prediction confidence, and convergence issues due to the mismatch between deterministic training and non-deterministic device variations. NFT addresses this by introducing a negative feedback loop that tracks changes in the output while being distinct from it. This helps the network learn sufficient variation information from different points during training, rather than relying solely on the final output. Two specific NFT instances are proposed: Oriented Variational Forward (OVF) and Intermediate Representation Snapshot (IRS). OVF optimizes the network from an overall variational performance perspective, while IRS uses internal feature representations to constrain the training process. Extensive experiments on various DNN models and datasets demonstrate that NFT can significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 46.71% improvement in inference accuracy while reducing epistemic uncertainty, boosting output confidence, and improving convergence probability. The authors conclude that NFT represents an important step in reducing the mismatch between deterministic training and non-deterministic device variations, highlighting its potential as a new direction for improving DNN robustness.
Stats
The maximum absolute value of weights is denoted as max |W|. The desired weight value after quantization is represented as ¯W^d. The actual weight W^p represented by programmed NVM devices is W^p = ¯W^d + max |W| / (2^M - 1) * Σ^(M/K - 1)_{j=0} Δg * 2^(j*K), where Δg follows a Gaussian distribution N(0, σ^2_d).
Quotes
"Negative Feedback Training (NFT) leveraging the multi-scale noisy information captured from network." "Our methods outperform existing state-of-the-art methods with up to a 46.71% improvement in inference accuracy while reducing epistemic uncertainty, boosting output confidence, and improving convergence probability."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the NFT concept be extended to other types of device variations beyond the programming process, such as temporal variations or spatial variations

The NFT concept can be extended to address various types of device variations beyond the programming process, such as temporal and spatial variations. Temporal Variations: For temporal variations that result from stochastic fluctuations in the device material over time, NFT can be adapted to incorporate feedback mechanisms that capture the dynamic changes in device behavior. By introducing feedback loops that continuously monitor and adjust to temporal variations during training, the neural network can learn to adapt to these changes and improve robustness over time. Spatial Variations: Spatial variations, which stem from defects during fabrication and affect different regions of the device differently, can also be mitigated using NFT. By designing feedback mechanisms that consider the spatial distribution of variations and their impact on network performance, NFT can help the neural network learn to handle spatial variations effectively during training. Hybrid Variations: In cases where both temporal and spatial variations coexist, a hybrid approach combining feedback mechanisms tailored to each type of variation can be employed. By integrating feedback loops that address both temporal and spatial variations, NFT can provide comprehensive robustness against a wide range of device variations. By extending the NFT concept to encompass various types of device variations, researchers can develop more adaptive and resilient neural network accelerators that can effectively handle the complexities of real-world device behavior.

What are the potential trade-offs or limitations of the NFT approach, and how can they be addressed in future work

The NFT approach, while offering significant improvements in robustness against device variations, may have potential trade-offs and limitations that need to be addressed in future work: Computational Overhead: Implementing NFT may introduce additional computational complexity due to the need for feedback mechanisms and iterative training processes. This can lead to increased training time and resource requirements. To address this, optimization techniques such as parallel processing or hardware acceleration can be explored to mitigate the computational overhead. Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The effectiveness of NFT may be sensitive to hyperparameters such as the number of negative feedback components or the decay factors. Fine-tuning these hyperparameters for optimal performance can be challenging and time-consuming. Future research could focus on developing automated hyperparameter tuning algorithms or adaptive learning strategies to alleviate this limitation. Generalization to Different Architectures: While NFT has shown promising results for NVCIM DNN accelerators, its applicability to other neural network architectures or hardware accelerators may vary. Future work should investigate the adaptability of the NFT concept to diverse architectures and hardware platforms to ensure its broad utility and effectiveness. By addressing these trade-offs and limitations through further research and innovation, the NFT approach can be refined and optimized for enhanced performance and applicability in real-world scenarios.

Given the generality of the NFT concept, how might it be applied to improve the robustness of other types of neural network architectures or hardware accelerators beyond NVCIM DNN accelerators

The generality of the NFT concept opens up possibilities for its application to improve the robustness of various neural network architectures and hardware accelerators beyond NVCIM DNN accelerators. CNNs and RNNs: NFT can be applied to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to enhance their robustness against device variations. By incorporating negative feedback mechanisms tailored to the specific characteristics of CNNs and RNNs, NFT can improve the performance and reliability of these architectures in real-world applications. Graph Neural Networks: NFT can also be extended to Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to address device variations in graph-based data processing tasks. By developing feedback mechanisms that consider the unique structure of graph data, NFT can boost the robustness of GNNs and enable more accurate and stable predictions. Quantum Neural Networks: In the realm of quantum computing, NFT can be leveraged to enhance the robustness of Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) against noise and errors in quantum hardware. By integrating negative feedback loops that account for quantum-level variations, NFT can improve the performance and reliability of QNNs for quantum machine learning tasks. By exploring the application of NFT to a diverse range of neural network architectures and hardware accelerators, researchers can unlock new opportunities for improving robustness and performance in various domains of artificial intelligence and computing.
0