The Big-O Problem for Max-Plus Automata is Decidable and PSPACE-Complete

Core Concepts

The big-O problem for max-plus automata, which asks whether one automaton is asymptotically bounded by another, is decidable and PSPACE-complete.

Abstract

The paper studies the decidability and complexity of the big-O problem for max-plus automata. Max-plus automata are a generalization of finite state automata that assign integer values to input words, modeling quantities like costs or running times.
The key insights are:

The big-O problem for max-plus automata is decidable, in contrast to the undecidable containment problem for these automata.

The problem is PSPACE-complete, showing it is computationally tractable.

The proof relies on constructing a finite semigroup that captures the asymptotic behavior of the automata. This semigroup is equipped with two key operations - stabilization and flattening - that allow detecting the existence of a "witness" element, whose presence indicates that one automaton is not big-O of the other.
The PSPACE complexity comes from showing that the existence of a specific type of witness, called a "tractable witness", can be checked in polynomial space. This involves using Simon's forest factorization theorem to bound the structure of the relevant witnesses.
Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive resolution of the decidability and complexity of the big-O problem for max-plus automata, with new technical insights on analyzing the asymptotic behavior of these quantitative automata models.

Stats

There are no key metrics or figures used to support the author's arguments.

Quotes

There are no striking quotes supporting the author's key logics.

Key Insights Distilled From

The Big-O Problem for Max-Plus Automata is Decidable (PSPACE-Complete)

by Laure Daviau... at arxiv.org 04-30-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.05229.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How do the techniques developed in this paper for max-plus automata compare to the approaches used for other quantitative automata models, such as min-plus automata or probabilistic automata

The techniques developed in this paper for max-plus automata differ from approaches used for other quantitative automata models, such as min-plus automata or probabilistic automata, in several key aspects.

Decidability Results: While the big-O problem for max-plus automata is shown to be decidable and PSPACE-complete in this paper, the same problem for min-plus automata is undecidable. This highlights the distinct characteristics and complexities of different semirings and their associated automata models.

Special Operations: The introduction of specific operations like stabilisation and flattening in the context of max-plus automata is unique to this paper. These operations play a crucial role in identifying witnesses and analyzing the growth rates of functions computed by the automata. Such operations may not have direct analogs in other quantitative automata models.

Factorisation Trees: The concept of factorisation trees, used to represent the structure of witnesses in the context of max-plus automata, is a novel approach introduced in this paper. Factorisation trees provide a visual representation of the relationships between elements in the semigroup and aid in understanding the factors contributing to non-domination.

In summary, the techniques developed in this paper for max-plus automata demonstrate a tailored and specialized approach to analyzing the big-O problem, leveraging unique operations and structures specific to the max-plus semiring.

Can the insights on the structure of witnesses be leveraged to develop efficient algorithms for related problems, like the containment problem, beyond the decidability results

The insights gained from the analysis of witnesses and the structure of factorisation trees in the context of max-plus automata can indeed be leveraged to develop efficient algorithms for related problems, including the containment problem and other decision procedures in automata theory. Here's how:

Containment Problem: By understanding the characteristics of witnesses and the factors contributing to non-domination, one can potentially devise algorithms to efficiently determine whether one automaton is contained within another. The insights on witness structures can guide the search for specific elements that indicate containment or non-containment.

Algorithm Optimization: The knowledge of tractable witnesses and the properties of factorisation trees can lead to algorithmic optimizations. For example, identifying specific patterns or configurations in factorisation trees that signify non-domination can help streamline the decision-making process and reduce computational complexity.

Generalization to Other Problems: The principles and techniques developed for analyzing witnesses in the context of the big-O problem can be generalized to tackle similar challenges in automata theory. By adapting the concepts of factorisation trees and fault identification, efficient algorithms can be designed for a broader range of quantitative verification and analysis tasks.

In essence, the insights on witness structures offer a foundation for developing sophisticated algorithms that go beyond the big-O problem and address a variety of decision problems in automata theory.

What are the potential applications of the decidability and complexity results on the big-O problem for max-plus automata in areas like program analysis, verification, or machine learning

The decidability and complexity results on the big-O problem for max-plus automata have significant implications for various fields, including program analysis, verification, and machine learning. Here are some potential applications:

Program Analysis: In program analysis, understanding the growth rates of functions computed by max-plus automata can help in analyzing program behaviors, resource usage, and performance characteristics. The decidability of the big-O problem enables precise analysis of program complexities and runtime behaviors.

Verification: The results on the big-O problem can be utilized in verification tasks to compare the behaviors of different systems or models. By determining whether one automaton dominates another in terms of growth rates, verification processes can ensure the correctness and efficiency of systems.

Machine Learning: In machine learning, the insights from max-plus automata can be applied to optimization problems, pattern recognition, and sequence analysis. The decidability results provide a foundation for developing algorithms that can efficiently compare and analyze sequences of data, leading to improved learning models and predictive capabilities.

Overall, the decidability and complexity results open up avenues for applying max-plus automata theory in diverse areas, enhancing the precision and efficiency of analytical processes.