Core Concepts
The core message of this study is to propose a comprehensive framework, the Chukwuere Generative AI Chatbots Acceptance Model (CGAICAM), to guide the adoption and implementation of generative AI chatbots in higher education institutions.
Abstract
The study explores the rapidly evolving field of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbots in higher education, an industry undergoing significant technological changes. AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, HuggingChat, and Google Bard, are becoming increasingly common across various sectors, including education.
The key highlights and insights from the study are:
Background on AI chatbots and their classifications (menu/button-based, keyword recognition-based, and AI/NLP-based) and their potential to enhance learning, research, and administrative tasks in higher education.
Concerns around the use of AI chatbots in higher education, such as academic cheating, ethical issues related to biases, and security concerns.
Review of existing theoretical frameworks, including the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Technology Readiness Index (TRI 2.0), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Revised Technology Acceptance Model (RTAM), which provide the foundation for the proposed CGAICAM framework.
The CGAICAM framework, which integrates components from various models to address the adoption of generative AI chatbots in higher education. The framework includes factors such as readiness (optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, insecurity), perception (perceived usefulness and ease of use), basic infrastructure (facilitating conditions, social factors, economic factors, political factors), personal factors (social influence, hedonic motivation, habit, demographics), attitude, and actual usage.
Recommendations for developing a comprehensive framework, addressing crucial components, exploring the impact of AI chatbots on student learning outcomes, understanding the role of AI chatbots in facilitating research and academic support, and examining cultural and contextual factors.
Proposed future studies, including long-term impact studies, role of AI chatbots in academic support, and cultural and contextual studies, to further expand the understanding of generative AI chatbot adoption in higher education.
Stats
The study does not provide specific metrics or figures to support the key logics. However, it references several studies that have explored the use of AI chatbots in higher education, providing a comprehensive review of the existing literature.
Quotes
The study does not include any direct quotes from the content.