toplogo
Sign In

AV-Occupant Perceived Risk Model for Cut-In Scenarios with Empirical Evaluation


Core Concepts
Enhancing perceived risk estimation in AV cut-in scenarios is crucial for user trust and acceptance, addressed by the novel AV-Occupant Risk (AVOR) model.
Abstract
The content introduces the AV-Occupant Risk (AVOR) model for estimating perceived risk during autonomous vehicle (AV) cut-in scenarios. It highlights the importance of perceived risk in user acceptance of AVs and discusses the limitations of existing models. The study conducted an empirical evaluation with 18 participants to validate the AVOR model's effectiveness. The paper outlines the methodology, experimental setup, key findings, statistical analysis results, and model evaluation. It concludes by emphasizing the significance of accurately modeling perceived risk in diverse driving contexts. Structure: I. Introduction Importance of comfort and safety in AVs. II. Perceived Risk in AV Occupants Factors influencing motion comfort and perceived risk. III. Existing Models and Limitations Overview of current models for quantifying perceived risk. IV. Introduction of the AVOR Model Description of the novel AVOR model for cut-in scenarios. V. Experimental Setup and Findings Details on the experiment design, participants, scenarios used, and statistical analysis results. VI. Discussion on Results Analysis of how scenario types and scene populations affect perceived risk. VII. Conclusion Summary of study outcomes and future research directions.
Stats
76% of subjective risk responses indicate an increase in perceived risk at cut-in initiation. The AVOR model demonstrated a significant improvement in estimating perceived risk during early stages of cut-ins, enhancing accuracy by up to 54%.
Quotes
"The concept of the AVOR model can quantify perceived risk in other diverse driving contexts." "Perceived risk denotes the subjective assessment of potential hazards and their severity."

Deeper Inquiries

How can advancements in autonomous vehicles address individual variability in comfort perception?

Advancements in autonomous vehicles can address individual variability in comfort perception by incorporating customizable settings that cater to passengers' preferences. Features such as adjustable seating positions, climate control, lighting options, and entertainment systems can be personalized to enhance passenger comfort. Additionally, the integration of AI algorithms that adapt to individual behaviors and preferences can create a more tailored and comfortable experience for each occupant. By providing a range of options that allow passengers to customize their environment within the vehicle, AVs can better accommodate the diverse needs and preferences of different individuals.

What are potential implications if actual risks do not align with human perception?

If actual risks do not align with human perception, there could be significant implications for the acceptance and trustworthiness of autonomous vehicles. When individuals perceive lower risks than what actually exist, they may become overconfident in the capabilities of AVs, leading to complacency or risky behavior. On the other hand, if individuals perceive higher risks than what is present in reality, it may result in increased anxiety or discomfort while using autonomous vehicles. This discrepancy between perceived risk and actual risk could lead to safety issues, decreased user acceptance, and ultimately hinder the widespread adoption of AV technology.

How might incorporating dynamic uncertainties improve overall trust in autonomous vehicles?

Incorporating dynamic uncertainties into autonomous vehicle systems can improve overall trust by enhancing transparency and predictability for users. By accounting for unpredictable factors such as sudden changes in road conditions or unexpected obstacles on the road, AVs demonstrate an ability to adapt and respond effectively to challenging situations. This proactive approach instills confidence in passengers regarding the vehicle's capability to handle unforeseen circumstances safely. Furthermore, addressing dynamic uncertainties through advanced risk assessment models like the Autonomous Vehicle-Occupant Risk (AVOR) model mentioned above allows for more accurate estimation of perceived risk during complex driving scenarios like cut-ins. By providing real-time feedback on potential hazards based on dynamic object uncertainties within its environment, AVs can communicate their awareness and readiness to handle varying situations effectively. This improved situational awareness fosters a sense of reliability among occupants and enhances their trust in autonomous vehicle technology as a whole.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star