toplogo
Sign In

Secure and Private Biometric Template Matching using Multi-Vault Obfuscated Templates


Core Concepts
A secure and private biometric template matching system that uses multiple independent embeddings stored in separate vaults with chaff points to protect user identities and enable efficient authentication.
Abstract
The paper proposes a secure and private biometric template matching system that addresses the security and privacy concerns of traditional biometric systems. The key ideas are: Divide the original biometric template into multiple sub-templates and store them in separate vaults, each with a large number of randomly generated "chaff" points to obfuscate the real template. Use multiple independent deep learning models to generate distinct embeddings for each sub-template, making it computationally infeasible for an attacker to recover the original template. During verification, the query is matched against the top vectors from each vault, and a successful match requires satisfying a threshold number of vaults. This improves the true positive rate while maintaining a low false positive rate. The system leverages generative adversarial networks (GANs) to create realistic synthetic face images as chaff points, further enhancing privacy by avoiding the use of real user data. Extensive experiments on the AT&T, Georgia Tech, and LFW face datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, achieving high accuracy (AUC > 0.99) while providing strong security guarantees against brute-force attacks. The system is computationally efficient, with the complete end-to-end process taking only around 1.5 seconds on average, making it practical for real-world deployment.
Stats
The paper reports the following key statistics: The area under the curve (AUC) for the AT&T dataset is 0.9939. The AUC for the Georgia Tech dataset is 0.9942. The AUC for the LFW dataset is 0.9042. The true negative rate (TNR) is 100% for both the AT&T and Georgia Tech datasets. The true positive rate (TPR) ranges from 81.20% to 96.19% depending on the number of chaff points and the number of classifiers used.
Quotes
"Our approach leverages the power of generative models to create synthetic facial images, demonstrating their potential in building robust and secure end-to-end biometric systems." "Our work offers distinct advantages as it eliminates the risk of exposing real individuals' identities during the system's training and operation."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed multi-vault obfuscation technique be extended to other biometric modalities beyond facial recognition, such as fingerprints or iris scans?

The multi-vault obfuscation technique proposed in the context can be extended to other biometric modalities like fingerprints or iris scans by adapting the methodology to suit the unique characteristics of these modalities. For fingerprints, the enrollment templates can be divided into sub-templates and hidden with chaff points in multiple vaults, similar to the facial recognition approach. The generation of synthetic fingerprint images, possibly through Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), can serve as chaff points to enhance privacy and security. The process of securely storing and matching these templates can be adjusted to accommodate the specific features of fingerprint data, such as minutiae points and ridge patterns. Similarly, for iris scans, the biometric templates can be divided into segments and concealed with chaff points in separate vaults. The use of deep learning models to generate unique embeddings for iris scans can enhance the security of the system. Synthetic iris images can be utilized as chaff points to obfuscate the original templates. The matching process can involve retrieving the closest vectors from each vault and combining them to verify the authenticity of the iris scan. In essence, the core concept of multi-vault obfuscation, involving the division of templates, generation of chaff points, and secure storage in separate vaults, can be applied to various biometric modalities beyond facial recognition, ensuring robust security and privacy measures across different types of biometric data.

What are the potential trade-offs between security, privacy, and computational efficiency when adjusting the parameters of the system, such as the number of vaults, chaff points, and classifiers used?

When adjusting the parameters of the system, such as the number of vaults, chaff points, and classifiers used, there are several potential trade-offs between security, privacy, and computational efficiency that need to be considered: Security vs. Computational Efficiency: Increasing the number of vaults and chaff points can enhance security by making it more challenging for adversaries to identify the original templates. However, this may also lead to higher computational complexity during the matching process, potentially impacting the system's efficiency. Privacy vs. Accuracy: Adding more chaff points and vaults can improve privacy by increasing the obfuscation of biometric templates. Nevertheless, this could also introduce more noise into the system, potentially affecting the accuracy of biometric matching. Balancing privacy requirements with the need for accurate identification is crucial. Scalability vs. Resource Utilization: Scaling up the system by incorporating additional classifiers or increasing the number of vaults may improve resilience against attacks. Still, it could also demand more computational resources and memory, impacting the overall efficiency of the system. Complexity vs. Manageability: Introducing multiple parameters and components can enhance the complexity of the system, requiring more sophisticated management and maintenance. This complexity might affect the system's usability and ease of deployment. Therefore, when adjusting these parameters, it is essential to strike a balance between security, privacy, and computational efficiency to ensure optimal performance and effectiveness of the biometric authentication system.

How could the proposed approach be integrated with emerging technologies like blockchain or federated learning to further enhance the security and privacy guarantees of the biometric authentication system?

Integrating the proposed approach with emerging technologies like blockchain or federated learning can offer additional layers of security and privacy to the biometric authentication system: Blockchain Integration: By leveraging blockchain technology, the system can store biometric templates in a decentralized and tamper-proof manner. Each transaction or access to the templates can be recorded on the blockchain, ensuring transparency and auditability. Smart contracts can be used to enforce access control policies and manage authentication processes securely. Federated Learning: Incorporating federated learning allows the system to train machine learning models collaboratively across multiple devices without sharing sensitive biometric data. Each device can contribute to model training using local data, preserving user privacy. The aggregated model can then be used for biometric matching without exposing individual templates, enhancing privacy protection. Secure Data Sharing: Blockchain can facilitate secure data sharing and access control mechanisms, ensuring that only authorized entities can retrieve and use biometric templates. Federated learning can enable model updates without compromising the privacy of individual users, fostering a collaborative and privacy-preserving environment for biometric authentication. Enhanced Trust and Transparency: The combination of blockchain and federated learning instills trust in the system by providing a transparent and secure framework for managing biometric data. Users can have confidence in the privacy protections offered by the system while maintaining control over their sensitive information. By integrating these technologies, the biometric authentication system can achieve higher levels of security, privacy, and transparency, addressing key concerns in modern biometric systems and enhancing overall user trust and confidence.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star