toplogo
Sign In

Integrating Physics and Machine Learning: A Survey of Structural Mechanics Applications


Core Concepts
The integration of physics-based models and machine learning techniques, known as physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML), can improve the capabilities and reduce the individual shortcomings of data-driven or physics-only methods in modeling complex engineering systems.
Abstract
This paper discusses the spectrum of physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) methods, which aim to combine the strengths of physics-based and data-driven approaches. It presents a comprehensive survey of recent applications and developments of PEML techniques in the field of structural mechanics. The paper starts by highlighting the limitations of purely data-driven and purely physics-based methods, and the need for a balanced approach that integrates both. It then introduces the concept of a PEML spectrum, which ranges from white-box (heavily physics-based) to black-box (heavily data-driven) approaches. The survey covers several PEML genres, including: Physics-based Bayesian Filtering (BF): Coupling a physics-based state-space model with sparse and noisy monitoring data to estimate system states and parameters. Physics-Guided Neural Networks (PgNNs): Using neural networks to capture the discrepancy between an explicitly defined physics-based model and the true system behavior. Dictionary Methods (DMs): Selecting a sparse representation of the model via linear superposition from a dictionary of candidate functions. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs): Embedding physics constraints directly into the neural network architecture or loss function. Physics-Encoded Neural Networks (PeNNs): Encoding physical principles into the neural network structure, such as through the choice of operators, kernels, or transforms. Constrained Gaussian Processes (CGPs): Incorporating physics constraints into Gaussian process models. Throughout the paper, the authors use a working example of a Duffing oscillator to demonstrate the characteristics and potential of the different PEML approaches. The provided code repository allows readers to explore these methods in a practical setting. The paper advocates the pivotal role of PEML in advancing computing for engineering through the merger of physics-based knowledge and machine learning capabilities.
Stats
"The intersection of physics and machine learning has given rise to the physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) paradigm, aiming to improve the capabilities and reduce the individual shortcomings of data- or physics-only methods." "Data-driven schemes are particularly suited for the case of monitored systems, where availability of data is ensured via measurement of engineering quantities through the use of appropriate sensors." "Even if a black-box model attains marginally superior accuracy, its inability to unravel the fundamental underlying processes renders it inadequate for furthering downstream scientific applications."
Quotes
"In efficiently modelling such systems, a viable approach is to integrate the aspect of physics, which is linked to forward modelling with the aspect of learning from data (via machine learning tools), which can account for modelling uncertainties and imprecision." "The reliance on the physics can be quantified in terms of the level of strictness of the physics model prescription. The level of strictness refers to the degree to which the prescribed model form incorporates and adheres to the underlying physical principles, and concurrently defines the set of systems which the prescribed model can emulate." "The combination of the strictness in the prescription of a model form and the learner constraints defines the overall flexibility of the PEML scheme; this refers to its capability to emulate systems of varying types and complexities."

Deeper Inquiries

How can PEML methods be extended to handle more complex, multi-physics engineering systems?

Physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) methods can be extended to handle more complex, multi-physics engineering systems by incorporating a combination of physics-based models and data-driven techniques. One approach is to develop hybrid models that integrate different physics domains, such as fluid dynamics, structural mechanics, and heat transfer, into a unified framework. This can be achieved by combining multiple physics-guided neural networks (PGNNs) or physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to capture the interactions between different physical phenomena. Furthermore, incorporating domain knowledge and constraints from various physics domains can help in building more accurate and robust models for multi-physics systems. By leveraging the synergy between physics-based insights and machine learning capabilities, PEML methods can effectively capture the complex interactions and dependencies present in multi-physics systems. Additionally, using advanced techniques such as Bayesian filtering with deep learning models can enhance the predictive capabilities of PEML frameworks for multi-physics systems.

How can PEML techniques be leveraged to enable more efficient and reliable digital twin applications for large-scale infrastructure systems?

PEML techniques can be leveraged to enable more efficient and reliable digital twin applications for large-scale infrastructure systems by integrating physics-based models with data-driven approaches. By combining the predictive power of machine learning with the physical insights provided by physics models, PEML frameworks can enhance the accuracy and reliability of digital twins for infrastructure systems. One key aspect is to develop hybrid models that incorporate physics-guided neural networks or physics-encoded neural networks to capture the underlying physics of the infrastructure system. These models can then be trained on real-time sensor data to continuously update and improve the digital twin's predictive capabilities. Additionally, using Bayesian filtering techniques within the digital twin framework can help in estimating system states and parameters more accurately, leading to more reliable predictions and decision-making. Moreover, by leveraging PEML techniques, digital twins can adapt to changing environmental and operational conditions, allowing for real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and optimization of infrastructure systems. The integration of PEML methods can also enable digital twins to handle uncertainties and variations in the system behavior, making them more robust and adaptable to dynamic operational scenarios.

What are the potential challenges in developing robust and generalizable PEML frameworks that can adapt to changing environmental and operational conditions?

Developing robust and generalizable PEML frameworks that can adapt to changing environmental and operational conditions faces several challenges. Some of the key challenges include: Data Quality and Quantity: Ensuring the availability of high-quality and sufficient data for training PEML models is crucial. Limited or noisy data can lead to biased or inaccurate predictions, affecting the robustness of the framework. Model Interpretability: Balancing the trade-off between model complexity and interpretability is essential. Complex models may provide accurate predictions but lack interpretability, making it challenging to understand the underlying mechanisms driving the predictions. Model Generalization: Ensuring that PEML models can generalize well to unseen data and adapt to changing conditions is a significant challenge. Overfitting to specific datasets or conditions can hinder the model's ability to perform effectively in diverse scenarios. Incorporating Domain Knowledge: Effectively integrating domain knowledge and constraints into the PEML framework while allowing for flexibility and adaptability is a challenge. Ensuring that the model captures the relevant physics of the system without being overly constrained is crucial for generalizability. Scalability and Computational Efficiency: Developing PEML frameworks that are scalable and computationally efficient, especially for large-scale infrastructure systems, can be challenging. Balancing model complexity with computational resources is essential for real-time applications. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach that combines expertise in machine learning, physics, and engineering domain knowledge. By carefully designing and training PEML models, considering the specific requirements of the application domain, and continuously validating and updating the models, robust and generalizable frameworks can be developed to adapt to changing environmental and operational conditions.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star