toplogo
Sign In

Deep Phase Coded Imaging: Joint Reconstruction of All-in-Focus Images and Depth Maps from a Single Captured Image


Core Concepts
A self-supervised method for jointly recovering an all-in-focus image and a pixel-level depth map from a single phase-coded captured image, without requiring any training dataset.
Abstract
The paper proposes a new method called "Deep Phase Coded Image Prior" (DPCIP) for jointly recovering the depth map and all-in-focus image from a phase-coded captured image. The key ideas are: Formulating the task as an implicit neural representation (INR) problem, where an encoder-decoder generator maps an input code to a pair of an all-in-focus image and a depth map. Incorporating a differentiable approximation of the phase-coded imaging acquisition process (Differential Camera Model, DCM) into the optimization, allowing end-to-end joint optimization of the generator and the forward process. Leveraging the Deep Image Prior (DIP) concept to enable recovering the depth map and all-in-focus image from a single captured image, without requiring any training dataset. The method outperforms prior supervised techniques utilizing the same phase-coded imaging system, both in depth estimation and all-in-focus image reconstruction, on simulated data. It also shows promising results on real-world examples, demonstrating the ability to overcome the barrier of acquiring accurate ground-truth data for each new phase-coded system.
Stats
The paper provides the following key figures and metrics: Depth estimation RMSE error [m]: Mono network from [4]: 0.1639, DPCIP: 0.0003 (Table 1) All-in-Focus image reconstruction PSNR [dB] / SSIM: Baseline [7]: 24.01 / 0.65, DPCIP: 29.73 / 0.91 (City) Baseline [7]: 28.54 / 0.92, DPCIP: 31.28 / 0.94 (Headbutt) Baseline [7]: 26.12 / 0.81, DPCIP: 30.04 / 0.91 (Sitting) Baseline [7]: 26.94 / 0.87, DPCIP: 31.45 / 0.93 (WallSlam) Baseline [7]: 23.67 / 0.71, DPCIP: 30.86 / 0.93 (WuManchu) (Table 2) Image deblurring PSNR [dB] / SSIM: Baseline [13]: 19.6 / 0.67, DPCIP: 26.38 / 0.834 (Table 5)
Quotes
None.

Key Insights Distilled From

by Nimrod Shabt... at arxiv.org 04-08-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.03906.pdf
Deep Phase Coded Image Prior

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed self-supervised approach be extended to handle real-world scenarios with more complex scenes and lighting conditions

The proposed self-supervised approach can be extended to handle real-world scenarios with more complex scenes and lighting conditions by incorporating additional elements into the training process. One way to enhance the model's performance in real-world scenarios is to introduce data augmentation techniques that simulate various lighting conditions, occlusions, and scene complexities. By training the model on a diverse set of augmented data, it can learn to adapt to different real-world scenarios more effectively. Furthermore, integrating domain adaptation techniques can help the model generalize better to unseen real-world data. This involves fine-tuning the model on a small set of real-world data to bridge the domain gap between the synthetic training data and the real-world test data. By gradually exposing the model to real-world scenarios during training, it can learn to handle the complexities and variations present in actual imaging conditions. Additionally, leveraging transfer learning from pre-trained models on related tasks can provide a head start for the model when dealing with real-world scenarios. By initializing the model with weights learned from tasks like image classification or segmentation, it can capture more intricate features and patterns in the data, leading to improved performance in complex scenes and lighting conditions.

What are the potential limitations of the current Differential Camera Model (DCM) and how could it be further improved to better capture the nuances of real-world phase-coded imaging systems

The current Differential Camera Model (DCM) has some potential limitations that could be addressed to better capture the nuances of real-world phase-coded imaging systems. One limitation is the assumption of known optical parameters, such as lens parameters and focus points, which may not always be accurately known in practice. To improve the DCM, incorporating a mechanism for estimating these parameters from the captured data can enhance the model's adaptability to varying imaging conditions. Another limitation is the reliance on pre-defined depth-dependent Point Spread Function (PSF) kernels, which may not fully capture the complex optical characteristics of real-world systems. To address this, a more sophisticated approach could involve learning the PSF kernels directly from the data using neural networks. By allowing the model to adaptively learn the PSF kernels based on the input data, it can better capture the intricate depth-dependent blurring effects present in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, the current DCM's linear interpolation method for generating acquired images from a fixed set of depths may oversimplify the reconstruction process. Enhancing the interpolation technique with more advanced algorithms, such as non-linear interpolation or deep learning-based interpolation methods, can improve the fidelity of the reconstructed images and depth maps, leading to more accurate results in real-world applications.

Given the promising results, how could the DPCIP framework be adapted to enable joint optimization of the phase-coded imaging hardware design and the reconstruction algorithm

To adapt the DPCIP framework to enable joint optimization of the phase-coded imaging hardware design and the reconstruction algorithm, a holistic approach that integrates hardware and software components is essential. One way to achieve this is by incorporating a feedback loop between the imaging hardware parameters and the reconstruction algorithm during the optimization process. Firstly, the hardware design parameters, such as the phase mask characteristics and optical properties, can be optimized in conjunction with the reconstruction algorithm to maximize the quality of the captured images. This optimization process can involve techniques like reinforcement learning or evolutionary algorithms to iteratively adjust the hardware parameters based on the reconstruction performance metrics. Secondly, the reconstruction algorithm can be fine-tuned to adapt to the specific characteristics of the optimized hardware design. By jointly optimizing the reconstruction algorithm and the hardware parameters, the system can achieve a synergistic effect where the hardware design complements the reconstruction algorithm, leading to enhanced imaging performance. Moreover, incorporating real-time feedback mechanisms between the hardware and software components can enable dynamic adjustments based on the imaging conditions. This adaptive approach allows the system to continuously optimize both the hardware design and the reconstruction algorithm in response to changing environmental factors, ensuring optimal performance in diverse real-world scenarios.
0