toplogo
Sign In
insight - Computational Linguistics - # LLM Robustness Evaluation

NoMIRACL: Evaluating LLM Robustness in Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation


Core Concepts
The author establishes NoMIRACL, a dataset for evaluating LLM robustness in multilingual retrieval-augmented generation. The study highlights challenges in LLM performance and the need for improved robustness.
Abstract

NoMIRACL introduces a dataset to evaluate LLMs across 18 languages, measuring hallucination and error rates. Results show varying performance among different models, with GPT-4 demonstrating the best tradeoff. The study emphasizes the importance of improving LLM robustness for accurate responses.

The content discusses the challenges in RAG and the reliance on external knowledge sources to enhance LLM output accuracy. It addresses issues of factual hallucinations and outdated knowledge in LLMs. The evaluation setup involves measuring model tendencies to hallucinate answers and inaccuracies in recognizing relevant passages.

Key findings reveal that most LLMs struggle with balancing hallucination and error rates, highlighting the need for further research to enhance robustness. The empirical analysis uncovers patterns of response generation by different models, shedding light on their strengths and limitations.

Overall, NoMIRACL serves as a valuable resource for evaluating LLM performance and identifying areas for improvement in multilingual retrieval-augmented generation.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
Models like LLAMA-2, Orca-2, FLAN-T5 observe high hallucination rates. Mistral shows better handling of hallucinations but struggles with errors. GPT-4 provides a balanced tradeoff on both subsets.
Quotes
"NoMIRACL introduces a novel multilingual dataset to evaluate LLM hallucinations against first-stage retrieval errors." "We hope NoMIRACL can serve as a valuable dataset towards much-needed LLM robustness evaluation."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Nandan Thaku... at arxiv.org 03-05-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.11361.pdf
NoMIRACL

Deeper Inquiries

How can fine-tuning strategies improve LLM robustness beyond the evaluation conducted?

Fine-tuning strategies play a crucial role in enhancing LLM robustness beyond the evaluation conducted in several ways: Domain-specific Adaptation: Fine-tuning allows LLMs to adapt to specific domains or tasks, enabling them to perform better on specialized datasets or real-world applications. By training on domain-specific data, LLMs can learn task-specific nuances and improve their performance. Reducing Hallucinations: Fine-tuning with additional data that emphasizes correct answers and relevant information can help reduce hallucinations in LLM outputs. By providing more context during fine-tuning, models can learn to distinguish between factual information and noise. Addressing Bias and Fairness: Fine-tuning provides an opportunity to mitigate biases present in pre-trained models by retraining them on balanced datasets or incorporating bias-reducing techniques during the fine-tuning process. Adapting to New Information: Continuous fine-tuning allows LLMs to stay updated with new information and adapt their knowledge base over time. This ensures that the model remains relevant and accurate as new data becomes available. Improving Generalization: Fine-tuned models have shown improved generalization capabilities, allowing them to perform well on unseen data by learning from a diverse range of examples during training. By leveraging fine-tuning strategies effectively, researchers and practitioners can enhance LLM robustness across various dimensions such as accuracy, reliability, bias mitigation, domain adaptation, and overall performance in retrieval-augmented generation tasks.

How do human annotations impact dataset construction like NoMIRACL?

Human annotations play a significant role in constructing datasets like NoMIRACL but also introduce potential implications: Subjectivity: Human annotators may introduce subjectivity into the dataset creation process due to individual interpretations or biases when judging relevance or correctness of passages for queries. This subjectivity could lead to inconsistencies across annotations affecting dataset quality. Annotation Errors: Humans are prone to errors while labeling data which could result in inaccuracies within the dataset leading to incorrect model evaluations during training or testing phases if not adequately addressed through quality control measures. Scalability Challenges: Relying solely on human annotations for large-scale datasets like NoMIRACL may pose challenges related to scalability due to time-consuming nature of manual annotation processes especially when dealing with multilingual content across diverse languages. Cost Considerations: Human annotation is resource-intensive both in terms of time and cost which might limit the scale at which datasets can be constructed unless efficient mechanisms are implemented for cost-effective annotation procedures without compromising quality standards.

How can prompt optimization techniques enhance the performance of LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation?

Prompt optimization techniques offer several avenues for improving the performance of Language Models (LLMs) specifically tailored towards retrieval-augmented generation tasks: 1-Contextual Relevance Enhancement: Optimized prompts ensure that contextual cues provided align closely with input queries facilitating better understanding by language models resulting in more accurate responses grounded within retrieved passages. 2-Task-Specific Prompt Design: Tailoring prompts based on specific task requirements helps guide language models towards generating responses aligned with desired outcomes ensuring relevance between inputs queries & retrieved passages. 3-Noise Reduction: Well-crafted prompts assist language models filter out irrelevant information reducing chances of hallucination thereby enhancing response accuracy particularly critical when handling noisy external knowledge sources. 4-Implicit Instruction Incorporation: Optimization techniques enable embedding implicit instructions within prompts guiding language models towards desired behaviors without explicit directives promoting nuanced understanding & precise output generations. 5-Multi-step Prompt Strategies: Employing multi-step prompting methodologies where initial instructions gradually refine subsequent inputs aids complex reasoning scenarios fostering deeper comprehension & more coherent responses from language models. 6-Feedback Loop Integration: Iterative refinement loops utilizing feedback mechanisms based on model outputs allow continuous prompt adjustments optimizing model performances over successive iterations adapting dynamically changing contexts efficiently.
0
star