Sign In

Optimizing an Open-Source Linux-Capable RISC-V SoC with Improved Synthesis and Physical Design

Core Concepts
Basilisk, an optimized application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementation and design flow, achieves competitive performance by enhancing open-source electronic design automation (EDA) tools and the physical design of the Iguana RISC-V SoC.
The paper introduces Basilisk, an optimized ASIC implementation and design flow based on the open-source Iguana RISC-V system-on-chip (SoC). The authors present several improvements to the synthesis and physical design stages to enhance the quality of results (QoR) compared to the baseline Iguana design. Synthesis Improvements: Optimized part-select operations by replacing shift-based implementations with more efficient block-multiplexer trees. Overhauled the ABC logic optimization scripts to leverage recent research for better QoR. Integrated adders into the Booth multiplier's CSA tree to create fused multiply-add (FMA) units, reducing the critical path. Physical Design Improvements: Redesigned the power grid by reducing the width and increasing the count of power stripes on the top metal layer to ease routing congestion. Tuned the hyper-parameters of the routability-driven global placement engine in OpenROAD to improve the placement of dense blocks and achieve a routable design without design rule check (DRC) violations. The optimized Basilisk design achieves a 2.3x improvement in operating frequency (77 MHz) compared to the baseline Iguana design (33 MHz), while reducing the logic area from 1.8 MGE to 1.1 MGE. The core utilization is also increased from 50% to 55%. The authors collaborated with EDA tool developers and domain experts to identify and address issues in the open-source synthesis and place-and-route tools, exemplifying a synergistic effort towards competitive open-source EDA tools for research and industry applications.
Iguana: 33 MHz, 1.8 MGE, 182 logic levels Basilisk: 77 MHz, 1.1 MGE, 51 logic levels
"Basilisk exemplifies a synergistic effort towards competitive open-source electronic design automation (EDA) tools for research and industry applications."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the open-source EDA tool ecosystem be further improved to enable wider adoption and competitiveness with proprietary tools?

The open-source EDA tool ecosystem can be enhanced in several ways to increase adoption and competitiveness. Firstly, continued collaboration between developers, researchers, and industry experts is crucial. This collaboration can lead to the identification and resolution of issues, as seen in the Basilisk project, where feedback was provided to tool maintainers for improvements. Additionally, creating user-friendly interfaces and documentation can make open-source tools more accessible to a broader audience. Integration with popular platforms and standardization of formats can also facilitate interoperability and ease of use. Furthermore, investing in community support and training programs can help users navigate the tools effectively, fostering a more robust ecosystem.

What are the potential challenges and trade-offs in balancing the flexibility of open-source tools with the performance and ease of use of proprietary tools?

Balancing the flexibility of open-source tools with the performance and ease of use of proprietary tools presents several challenges and trade-offs. Open-source tools offer extensive customization and adaptability, allowing users to modify the code to suit their specific needs. However, this flexibility can also lead to complexity, requiring users to have a deeper understanding of the tools and underlying technologies. In contrast, proprietary tools often prioritize ease of use and performance, providing polished interfaces and optimized algorithms. Yet, this can come at the cost of limited customization and vendor lock-in. Finding the right balance between flexibility, performance, and usability is essential. Users must weigh the trade-offs between the control and transparency of open-source tools and the convenience and efficiency of proprietary solutions.

What other architectural or design techniques could be explored to further enhance the performance and efficiency of open-source RISC-V SoCs like Basilisk?

To further enhance the performance and efficiency of open-source RISC-V SoCs like Basilisk, several architectural and design techniques can be explored. One approach is to optimize the memory hierarchy by implementing advanced caching mechanisms or incorporating specialized memory units tailored to specific workloads. Additionally, exploring novel instruction set extensions or custom accelerators can improve the SoC's computational capabilities for specific tasks. Techniques like pipelining, out-of-order execution, and speculative execution can enhance instruction throughput and overall performance. Moreover, leveraging advanced power management schemes, such as dynamic voltage and frequency scaling, can optimize energy efficiency without compromising performance. Lastly, exploring heterogeneous multi-core architectures or integrating hardware accelerators for AI or signal processing tasks can further boost the SoC's performance and versatility.