toplogo
Sign In

Efficient Usage of Pre-trained Language Models for Sequential Recommendation


Core Concepts
Behavior-tuned pre-trained language models can effectively and efficiently boost sequential recommendation performance when used as item initializers, while their powerful sequence modeling capabilities are not fully utilized in existing PLM-based SR models.
Abstract
The paper explores the effectiveness and efficiency of using pre-trained language models (PLMs) for sequential recommendation (SR) tasks. The key findings are: Existing PLM-based SR models exhibit significant underutilization and parameter redundancy in their behavior sequence modeling, as their attention patterns are functionally stratified and resemble conventional ID-based SR models. A simple framework that uses behavior-tuned PLMs for item initialization and simplified ID-based sequence modeling can achieve comparable or even better performance than complex PLM-based SR models, without additional inference costs. Behavior-tuned PLMs as item initializers provide substantial performance boosts across different ID-based SR models and settings, suggesting the importance of capturing behavior-aware semantics in item representations. The effectiveness of behavior-tuned PLM initialization is transferable across domains and robust under the full-ranking evaluation setting, indicating its practical value. Minimal behavior-based pre-training of PLMs is sufficient to obtain the necessary behavior knowledge, making the proposed framework efficient and scalable. Overall, the paper provides insights on how to effectively and efficiently leverage the capabilities of PLMs for sequential recommendation, by decoupling the semantic and behavioral representations of items.
Stats
The average length of user historical sequences ranges from 5.5 to 10.1 across the datasets. The number of users ranges from 22,601 to 402,979, and the number of items ranges from 8,249 to 930,518 across the datasets.
Quotes
"Behavior-tuned pre-trained language models can effectively and efficiently boost sequential recommendation performance when used as item initializers, while their powerful sequence modeling capabilities are not fully utilized in existing PLM-based SR models." "A simple framework that uses behavior-tuned PLMs for item initialization and simplified ID-based sequence modeling can achieve comparable or even better performance than complex PLM-based SR models, without additional inference costs."

Deeper Inquiries

How can we further improve the efficiency of pre-training behavior-tuned PLMs to make the proposed framework more scalable?

To enhance the efficiency of pre-training behavior-tuned PLMs and make the framework more scalable, several strategies can be implemented: Transfer Learning Techniques: Utilize transfer learning methods to leverage pre-trained models and fine-tune them on specific behavior sequences. This approach can reduce the computational cost of training behavior-tuned PLMs from scratch. Data Augmentation: Implement data augmentation techniques to increase the diversity and size of the pre-training dataset. By augmenting the behavioral data, the PLMs can capture a wider range of user preferences and behaviors, leading to more robust representations. Parallel Processing: Employ parallel processing techniques to speed up the pre-training process. Distributing the workload across multiple processors or GPUs can significantly reduce the training time and improve efficiency. Optimized Hyperparameters: Fine-tune the hyperparameters of the pre-training process to optimize the performance of behavior-tuned PLMs. This includes adjusting learning rates, batch sizes, and other parameters to achieve faster convergence and better results. Incremental Learning: Implement incremental learning strategies to continuously update the behavior-tuned PLMs with new data. This approach allows the model to adapt to changing user behaviors over time without retraining from scratch. By incorporating these strategies, the efficiency of pre-training behavior-tuned PLMs can be improved, making the framework more scalable and adaptable to a variety of recommendation tasks.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of using behavior-tuned PLMs as item initializers, and how can they be addressed?

While using behavior-tuned PLMs as item initializers offers significant benefits, there are potential drawbacks and limitations that need to be addressed: Overfitting: Behavior-tuned PLMs may capture too much specific information from the pre-training data, leading to overfitting on the behavior sequences. Regularization techniques such as dropout or weight decay can help mitigate this issue. Limited Generalization: Behavior-tuned PLMs may struggle to generalize well to unseen data or new domains, as they are heavily influenced by the pre-training data. Transfer learning methods and domain adaptation techniques can be employed to improve generalization capabilities. Computational Resources: Training behavior-tuned PLMs can be computationally expensive, especially when dealing with large-scale datasets. Efficient hardware utilization, distributed training, and model compression techniques can help alleviate this limitation. Semantic Gap: There may be a semantic gap between the behavioral information captured by PLMs and the actual user preferences. Fine-tuning strategies that balance semantic knowledge with behavioral signals can help bridge this gap. Model Interpretability: Behavior-tuned PLMs may be complex and challenging to interpret, making it difficult to understand how they make recommendations. Model explainability techniques and interpretability tools can address this limitation. By addressing these drawbacks through appropriate regularization, generalization techniques, efficient resource utilization, semantic alignment strategies, and model interpretability enhancements, the use of behavior-tuned PLMs as item initializers can be optimized for improved recommendation performance.

How can the insights from this work be applied to other recommendation tasks beyond sequential recommendation, such as session-based or cross-domain recommendation?

The insights from this work can be applied to other recommendation tasks beyond sequential recommendation in the following ways: Session-Based Recommendation: For session-based recommendation, behavior-tuned PLMs can be leveraged to capture user interactions within a session and provide personalized recommendations based on sequential patterns. By initializing session representations with behavior-tuned PLMs, the model can better understand user preferences and make context-aware recommendations. Cross-Domain Recommendation: In cross-domain recommendation, behavior-tuned PLMs can be used to transfer knowledge across different domains and improve recommendation performance. By pre-training PLMs on diverse datasets and fine-tuning them on specific domains, the model can learn domain-specific behaviors and enhance cross-domain recommendation accuracy. Multi-Task Learning: The insights from this work can also be applied to multi-task learning scenarios, where behavior-tuned PLMs can be utilized for multiple recommendation tasks simultaneously. By sharing knowledge and representations across tasks, the model can benefit from a more comprehensive understanding of user preferences and behaviors. Cold-Start Recommendations: Behavior-tuned PLMs can be instrumental in addressing cold-start recommendation challenges by capturing latent user preferences and behaviors. By initializing item embeddings with behavior-aware PLMs, the model can make more informed recommendations for new or underrepresented items. By adapting the principles of behavior-tuned PLMs and the framework proposed in this work to session-based, cross-domain, multi-task, and cold-start recommendation tasks, recommendation systems can achieve enhanced performance, personalization, and adaptability across a wide range of scenarios.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star