toplogo
Sign In

I/O Patterns and Optimizations for Machine Learning Applications on High-Performance Computing Systems


Core Concepts
Machine learning (ML) workloads on high-performance computing (HPC) systems exhibit distinct I/O access patterns compared to traditional HPC applications, posing challenges for existing storage systems. Efficient I/O optimization techniques are needed to improve training speeds and enable rapid development of ML models.
Abstract
The paper presents a comprehensive survey of I/O in ML applications on HPC systems, covering the following key aspects: Data Formats and Modalities: ML applications use a variety of file formats (e.g., TFRecord, HDF5, Parquet) and dataset modalities (e.g., image, audio, video, text) that impact I/O performance. The choice of file format and dataset organization (one sample per file vs. multiple samples per file) affects the required I/O operations and metadata management overhead. Common ML Phases and Training Distribution: The ML lifecycle consists of data generation, dataset preparation, training, and inference phases. During the training phase, stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is the most popular algorithm, leading to random small I/O reads that can be a bottleneck for parallel file systems (PFS). Distributed training strategies, such as data parallelism and model parallelism, introduce additional I/O and synchronization challenges. Model checkpointing is crucial for long-running training jobs but can significantly impact performance due to the growing complexity of ML models. I/O Benchmarks and Profiling: Benchmarks like DLIO can simulate I/O access patterns of DL workloads, helping identify bottlenecks. Profiling tools like tf-Darshan provide fine-grained I/O performance analysis for ML applications. Analysis of I/O Access Patterns: The I/O access patterns of the Unet3D and BERT workloads, simulated using DLIO, exhibit small random reads that can be challenging for PFSs. The number of batches read per epoch depends on the batch size, number of processes, and total samples, leading to non-overlapping I/O requests. I/O Optimization Techniques: Current ML frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, Scikit-Learn with Dask-ML) provide various I/O optimization features, such as dataset streaming, parallel data preparation, sample prefetching, and caching. Recent research proposes additional techniques, including distributed sample caching, asynchronous and distributed checkpointing, and I/O-aware scheduling. The survey identifies several gaps in current research, including the need for more realistic benchmarks, comprehensive profiling tools, and advanced I/O optimization techniques tailored to the unique requirements of ML workloads on HPC systems.
Stats
"The dataset for Unet3d consists of one sample per NPZ file where each sample is approximately 146 MiBs. There were a total of 168 samples." "The dataset size for BERT was configured to increase training speeds, with 10 TFRecord files containing 31,353 samples each, for a total of 131,530 samples. Each sample was 2,500 bytes."
Quotes
"Due to the prevalence of SGD, random batches of samples are read into memory at each iteration during model training. Small random I/O reads can be a bottleneck for PFSs which motivates the need for I/O optimization techniques such as prefetching and caching to ensure fast training speeds." "Efficient I/O optimization techniques are needed to improve training speeds and enable rapid development of ML models."

Deeper Inquiries

How can ML frameworks and storage systems be further integrated to provide seamless and transparent I/O optimizations for a wide range of ML workloads on HPC systems

To further integrate ML frameworks and storage systems for seamless and transparent I/O optimizations on HPC systems, several strategies can be implemented: Unified I/O Interface: Develop a unified I/O interface that abstracts the underlying storage system complexities and provides a common set of APIs for data loading, preprocessing, and model training across different ML frameworks. This interface can handle data distribution, caching, prefetching, and shuffling transparently to optimize I/O performance. Dynamic Resource Allocation: Implement dynamic resource allocation mechanisms that adjust the storage system resources based on the specific requirements of ML workloads. This can involve intelligent data placement strategies, adaptive caching policies, and dynamic prefetching techniques to optimize data access patterns. Parallel Data Processing: Enhance parallel data processing capabilities within ML frameworks to leverage the distributed nature of HPC systems. This includes optimizing data loading and preprocessing tasks to run efficiently across multiple nodes or GPUs, utilizing parallel I/O operations for faster data access. Integration with High-Performance Storage: Integrate ML frameworks with high-performance storage systems such as Lustre or GPFS to leverage their advanced features like striping, caching, and data replication. This integration can improve data access speeds, reduce latency, and enhance overall I/O performance for ML workloads. Automated I/O Tuning: Implement automated I/O tuning mechanisms that analyze the characteristics of ML workloads, adjust I/O parameters dynamically, and optimize data access patterns in real-time. This can involve machine learning algorithms to predict optimal I/O configurations based on workload requirements. By implementing these strategies, ML frameworks and storage systems can work together seamlessly to provide efficient and optimized I/O operations for a wide range of ML workloads on HPC systems.

What novel I/O access patterns and optimization techniques may emerge as ML models and datasets continue to grow in complexity and scale

As ML models and datasets continue to grow in complexity and scale, novel I/O access patterns and optimization techniques may emerge to address the evolving requirements: Adaptive Prefetching: Advanced prefetching algorithms that dynamically adjust prefetching strategies based on the data access patterns and model training progress. This can involve predictive prefetching based on historical data access trends and model behavior. Distributed Caching: Enhanced distributed caching mechanisms that utilize memory across multiple nodes or GPUs to store frequently accessed data and intermediate results. This can reduce I/O overhead and improve training speeds for large-scale ML models. I/O-aware Model Design: Future ML models may incorporate I/O considerations into their design, optimizing data access patterns, memory usage, and computation to minimize I/O bottlenecks. This can involve model architectures that reduce data movement and maximize data reuse. Smart Data Partitioning: Intelligent data partitioning techniques that dynamically split and distribute datasets based on the available storage resources and processing capabilities. This can optimize data locality, reduce network congestion, and improve overall system performance. Real-time I/O Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of I/O performance metrics during model training to identify bottlenecks, predict potential issues, and dynamically adjust I/O optimizations. This can involve real-time feedback loops that adapt I/O strategies based on changing workload conditions. By exploring these emerging trends and techniques, ML practitioners can stay ahead of the curve and optimize I/O performance for increasingly complex ML workloads.

How can the insights from this survey be applied to improve the I/O performance of other data-intensive scientific applications running on HPC infrastructure

The insights from the survey on I/O in ML applications on HPC systems can be applied to improve the I/O performance of other data-intensive scientific applications running on HPC infrastructure in the following ways: Adaptation of I/O Optimization Techniques: The optimization techniques identified in the survey, such as parallel data processing, prefetching, and caching, can be adapted and implemented in other scientific applications to enhance their I/O performance. By leveraging similar strategies, applications can improve data access speeds and overall efficiency. Customized I/O Solutions: Understanding the common I/O access patterns and challenges faced by ML workloads can help in developing customized I/O solutions for different scientific applications. By tailoring optimization techniques to specific data processing requirements, applications can achieve better performance outcomes. Cross-Domain Collaboration: Collaboration between ML researchers and practitioners in other scientific domains can facilitate knowledge sharing and the adoption of best practices in I/O optimization. By exchanging insights and experiences, different fields can benefit from each other's expertise and enhance their I/O performance strategies. Benchmarking and Profiling: Utilizing benchmarking tools and profiling techniques similar to those discussed in the survey can help identify I/O bottlenecks and performance issues in other scientific applications. By conducting thorough analyses and optimizations, applications can streamline their data processing workflows and improve overall efficiency. By applying the lessons learned from the survey to a broader range of data-intensive scientific applications, researchers and practitioners can enhance their I/O performance and accelerate their research outcomes on HPC systems.
0