toplogo
Sign In

Optimization-based Heuristic for Coordinating Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Intersections


Core Concepts
The main objective is to have a safe and optimal crossing order for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs) approaching unsignalized intersections.
Abstract

The paper addresses a coordination problem for CAVs in mixed traffic settings with HDVs. The goal is to achieve a safe and optimal crossing order for vehicles approaching unsignalized intersections.

The problem is first formulated as a mixed-integer quadratic programming (MIQP) problem, which is computationally expensive for real-time applications. To address this, the authors propose an optimization-based heuristic that monitors platoons of CAVs and HDVs to evaluate whether alternative crossing orders can perform better.

The heuristic first checks for potential future constraint violations between pairs of platoons to determine if a swap in crossing order is needed. It then compares the costs of quadratic programming (QP) formulations associated with the current and alternative orders in a depth-first branching fashion.

Simulations show that the heuristic can be up to a hundred times faster than the original and simplified MIQPs, while yielding solutions close to optimal and with better order consistency.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
The paper reports the following key metrics: Closed-loop cost (Φcl) and cost without slack terms (Φcl,S&I) Maximum constraint violation (ηmax) RMS of acceleration (uRMS) Computation time (tmax) Cardinality and timing of reordering (|τ|)
Quotes
"The main objective is to have a safe and optimal crossing order for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs) approaching unsignalized intersections." "The proposed heuristic is then derived as an approximation of the MIQP, inspired by branch-and-bound (B&B) strategies but specifically tailored to this problem." "Simulations show that the heuristic can be up to a hundred times faster than the original and simplified MIQPs, while yielding solutions close to optimal and with better order consistency."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the heuristic be extended to handle more complex intersection geometries or multiple conflict zones

To extend the heuristic to handle more complex intersection geometries or multiple conflict zones, several modifications and enhancements can be implemented. Adaptation to Multiple Conflict Zones: The heuristic can be modified to consider multiple conflict zones by incorporating additional safety constraints and coordination strategies for each zone. This would involve expanding the consistency check to cover all conflict zones and adjusting the cost comparison process to account for the interactions between different zones. Dynamic Reordering Across Zones: The heuristic can be designed to dynamically reorder vehicles across different conflict zones based on real-time traffic conditions. This would require a more sophisticated algorithm to prioritize and optimize the crossing order considering the interactions between vehicles in different zones. Geometric Considerations: For more complex intersection geometries, the heuristic can be enhanced to incorporate geometric constraints such as lane configurations, turning movements, and lane-specific priorities. This would involve developing a more advanced model that takes into account the specific layout of the intersection and the movement patterns of vehicles. Integration of Traffic Signal Data: In scenarios where traffic signals are present in addition to the heuristic-based coordination, the algorithm can be extended to integrate real-time signal data to optimize the overall traffic flow. This would involve developing a hybrid approach that combines the benefits of both signal control and heuristic-based coordination.

What are the potential challenges in implementing the proposed approach in a real-world setting, and how can they be addressed

Implementing the proposed approach in a real-world setting may face several challenges that need to be addressed to ensure successful deployment. Some potential challenges and their corresponding solutions include: Real-time Data Integration: Challenge: Obtaining real-time data from connected vehicles and infrastructure to inform the coordination algorithm. Solution: Implement robust communication systems and data processing mechanisms to ensure timely and accurate data exchange. Scalability: Challenge: Scaling the algorithm to handle a large number of vehicles and complex traffic scenarios. Solution: Optimize the algorithm for efficiency and parallel processing, and conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure scalability. Safety and Reliability: Challenge: Ensuring the safety and reliability of the coordination algorithm in dynamic traffic environments. Solution: Implement rigorous testing, validation, and simulation procedures to assess the algorithm's performance under various conditions and scenarios. Regulatory Compliance: Challenge: Adhering to regulatory requirements and standards for autonomous vehicle operations. Solution: Collaborate with regulatory bodies and stakeholders to ensure compliance with legal and safety regulations, and continuously update the algorithm based on evolving standards. Human Factor: Challenge: Accounting for human drivers' behavior and interactions with autonomous vehicles. Solution: Incorporate predictive models and machine learning algorithms to anticipate human driver actions and adjust the coordination strategy accordingly.

How can the performance of the heuristic be further improved, for example, by incorporating machine learning techniques to predict HDV behavior more accurately

Improving the performance of the heuristic can be achieved by incorporating machine learning techniques to enhance the prediction of HDV behavior and optimize the coordination strategy. Some ways to enhance the heuristic using machine learning include: Behavior Prediction: Utilize machine learning models to predict HDV behavior based on historical data, traffic patterns, and environmental factors. This can help anticipate potential conflicts and optimize the crossing order in advance. Adaptive Learning: Implement adaptive learning algorithms that continuously update and refine the coordination strategy based on real-time data and feedback. This can improve the algorithm's responsiveness to changing traffic conditions. Anomaly Detection: Integrate anomaly detection algorithms to identify unusual or unexpected behavior from HDVs and trigger appropriate responses in the coordination strategy. This can enhance the algorithm's ability to handle unpredictable situations. Optimization Algorithms: Combine machine learning with optimization algorithms to dynamically adjust the crossing order based on predicted HDV trajectories and traffic flow patterns. This can lead to more efficient and adaptive coordination strategies. By incorporating machine learning techniques into the heuristic, the algorithm can become more intelligent, adaptive, and capable of optimizing vehicle coordination in mixed traffic environments.
0
star