Core Concepts
Deterministic algorithm for (1-ε)-approximating Knapsack with running time ˜O(n + ε^-2).
Abstract
The content discusses the complexity of the Knapsack problem and its approximation algorithms. It covers historical developments, theoretical bounds, and recent advancements in achieving efficient solutions. The core focus is on a deterministic algorithm that closes the gap between lower bounds and algorithmic performance.
Introduction
Knapsack problem's significance in computer science.
Definition of the problem and its complexity.
FPTASs for 0-1 knapsack
Historical overview of fully polynomial-time approximation schemes.
Comparison of different algorithms based on their running times.
Reductions and Lower Bounds
Reductions showing limitations on FPTAS for knapsack problems.
Theoretical lower bounds based on convolution hypotheses.
Recent Advances
Overview of recent algorithms by Deng, Jin, Mao closing the gap.
Improved greedy lemma techniques and additive combinatorics results.
Sparsification Technique
Introduction to sparsification for Subset Sum problem.
Discussion on potential application to Knapsack problem.
Main Algorithm
Reduction to sparse cases using recursive greedy exchange.
Approximation for sparse cases using geometry-based techniques.
Core Lemma Proof
Detailed proof of Lemma 2.3 providing an efficient solution to the Knapsack problem.
Stats
The best algorithm runs in ˜O(n + (1/ε)2) time [Deng, Jin and Mao, SODA 2023].
Quotes
"We answer the question positively by showing a deterministic (1−ε)-approximation scheme for knapsack that runs in ˜O(n+(1/ε)2) time."
"Experts have been pursuing an algorithm matching this lower bound long before it was known."
"Our core geometry-based procedure is fairly simple yet different from popular techniques."