toplogo
Sign In

Analyzing Robust Synthetic-to-Real Transfer for Stereo Matching


Core Concepts
The author explores the degradation of domain generalization ability during fine-tuning stereo networks, identifying the importance of regularization and avoiding overfitting. The proposed DKT framework dynamically measures learning to improve robustness and generalization.
Abstract

The content discusses the challenges of fine-tuning stereo matching networks with synthetic data pre-training in real-world scenarios. It introduces the concept of Ground Truth (GT) versus Pseudo Label (PL) for fine-tuning, highlighting the importance of regularization and preventing overfitting. The DKT framework is proposed to address these issues by utilizing an EMA Teacher to enhance GT and PL during fine-tuning, resulting in improved robustness and generalization across various datasets.

The experiments conducted on different datasets show that using PL can preserve domain generalization ability, while GT supervision is crucial for target-domain performance. Fine-grained permutations added by the EMA Teacher help prevent overfitting details in GT. Comparisons with other methods demonstrate the effectiveness of DKT in maintaining robustness during fine-tuning.

Key metrics such as error percentages are used to evaluate performance on different datasets, showcasing the benefits of using GT and PL effectively in stereo matching networks. Visualizations and ablation studies further support the findings, emphasizing the significance of dynamic adjustments based on what networks have learned.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
Few studies have investigated robustness after fine-tuning stereo networks. Pre-trained models on synthetic data show strong robustness. Fine-tuning degrades domain generalization ability. Proposed DKT framework improves robustness during fine-tuning. Extensive experiments show effectiveness on real-world datasets.
Quotes
"The difference between GT and PL contains valuable information." "PL preserves domain generalization ability better than GT during fine-tuning." "DKT dynamically adjusts learning based on what networks have learned."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Jiawei Zhang... at arxiv.org 03-13-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.07705.pdf
Robust Synthetic-to-Real Transfer for Stereo Matching

Deeper Inquiries

How can domain generalization methods be adapted for real-world scenarios?

Domain generalization methods can be adapted for real-world scenarios by incorporating techniques that enhance the robustness of models to unseen domains. This adaptation involves training models on diverse datasets that represent a wide range of real-world conditions, such as different lighting conditions, weather patterns, and object variations. Additionally, utilizing data augmentation strategies that simulate real-world variability can help improve the model's ability to generalize across different domains. Regularizing the learning process to prevent overfitting to specific domain characteristics is also crucial in adapting domain generalization methods for real-world scenarios.

What are potential drawbacks of relying solely on synthetic data pre-training?

Relying solely on synthetic data pre-training has several potential drawbacks: Lack of Real-World Variability: Synthetic data may not fully capture the complexity and variability present in real-world scenarios, leading to limited model performance when applied in practical settings. Domain Shift: Models trained only on synthetic data may struggle with domain shift when deployed in real-world environments where there are differences in distribution between training and testing data. Limited Generalization: Models trained exclusively on synthetic data may lack the adaptability and generalization capabilities needed to perform well across diverse real-world conditions. Unforeseen Challenges: Synthetic datasets may not adequately represent all possible challenges or edge cases encountered in actual deployment scenarios, limiting the model's ability to handle unexpected situations.

How can insights from this study be applied to other domains beyond stereo matching?

Insights from this study can be applied to other domains beyond stereo matching by: Fine-Tuning Strategies: Implementing fine-tuning techniques that preserve robustness during transfer learning from synthetic to real data. Dynamic Adjustment Mechanisms: Developing frameworks similar to DKT that dynamically adjust learning based on what has been learned during fine-tuning, ensuring better adaptation and performance across different domains. Regularization Techniques: Utilizing regularization methods tailored for specific tasks or datasets helps prevent overfitting and enhances generalization abilities. Data Augmentation Practices: Incorporating realistic data augmentation practices simulating various environmental factors or challenges present in target domains improves model adaptability. By applying these principles across different domains, researchers and practitioners can enhance the performance and applicability of machine learning models in varied real-world settings beyond stereo matching applications.
0
star