Trends in Large Language Model Research: Analysis of 17K arXiv Papers Reveals Shifts in Topics, Authors, and Institutional Collaborations

Core Concepts

Large language model (LLM) research is rapidly evolving, with increasing focus on societal impacts, influx of authors from non-NLP fields, reduced industry publishing, and limited cross-country collaborations.

Abstract

The analysis of 16,979 LLM-related papers posted to arXiv from 2018 to 2023 reveals several key trends:

Topical shifts: LLM research is increasingly considering societal impacts, with the Computers and Society sub-arXiv growing 20x faster than other sub-areas. New topics like "Applications of ChatGPT" and "Societal Implications of LLMs" have seen 8x and 4x growth, respectively. Meanwhile, topics on BERT and task-specific architectures are shrinking due to centralization around newer models.

Author composition: Half of LLM first authors in 2023 have never previously co-authored an NLP paper, and nearly two-thirds have not co-authored an LLM paper before. These new authors are entering from fields like Computer Vision, Software Engineering, and Security, and are publishing on topics further from core NLP.

Industry vs. academia: While industry continues to lead high-impact research, their overall publication share has decreased in 2023, particularly for large tech companies like Google. Academics, especially universities in Asia, are publishing more. Industry focuses more on general-purpose methods, while academics apply these models to diverse applications and study societal implications.

Collaboration patterns: Industry-academic collaborations are common, but tend to focus on industry-favored topics rather than bridging differences. There is very little cross-country collaboration, especially between the US and China, with the exception of Microsoft.

These findings have implications for supporting new researchers, incentivizing open-source contributions, and fostering international collaboration in the rapidly evolving field of large language model research.

Stats

LLM research now accounts for 12% of all CS/Stat papers on arXiv in mid-2023, up from previous years.
The Computers and Society sub-arXiv has seen a 20x increase in the proportion of LLM papers in 2023 compared to before.
Half (49.5%) of LLM first authors in 2023 have never previously co-authored an NLP paper, and nearly two-thirds (62.5%) haven't co-authored an LLM paper before.
Industry accounts for 32% of LLM papers, down from 41% before 2023, with a particular drop from Google.
The top 10 institutions with the largest increases in LLM publishing share in 2023 are all universities in Asia.
There is very little collaboration between the top US and Chinese institutions working on LLMs, with an average of only 1.1 papers per pair.

Quotes

"LLM research increasingly focuses on societal impacts, evidenced by 20× growth in LLM submissions to the Computers and Society sub-arXiv."
"Half (49.5%) of LLM first authors in 2023 have never previously co-authored an NLP paper, and nearly two-thirds (62.5%) haven't co-authored an LLM paper before."
"Industry accounts for 32% of LLM papers in 2023, down from 41% before, with a particular drop from Google."

Key Insights Distilled From

Topics, Authors, and Institutions in Large Language Model Research: Trends from 17K arXiv Papers

by Rajiv Movva,... at arxiv.org 04-30-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.10700.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the research community effectively support and onboard the influx of new authors entering LLM research from diverse backgrounds?

The influx of new authors entering Large Language Model (LLM) research from diverse backgrounds presents both opportunities and challenges for the research community. To effectively support and onboard these new authors, several strategies can be implemented:

Educational Resources: Providing educational resources tailored to newcomers in LLM research can help bridge the knowledge gap. Workshops, tutorials, and online courses focusing on LLM fundamentals, research methodologies, and best practices can be beneficial.

Mentorship Programs: Establishing mentorship programs where experienced researchers guide and support new authors can facilitate their integration into the research community. Mentors can provide guidance on research projects, publication strategies, and career development.

Collaborative Research Initiatives: Encouraging collaborative research initiatives between new authors and established researchers can facilitate knowledge transfer and skill development. Collaborating on projects can help new authors gain practical experience and exposure to different research methodologies.

Research Checklists and Guidelines: Implementing research checklists and guidelines can promote good research practices among new authors. These tools can help ensure rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in research studies.

Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives: Emphasizing diversity and inclusion in research environments can create a welcoming and supportive atmosphere for new authors from diverse backgrounds. Encouraging diverse perspectives and experiences can lead to innovative research outcomes.

By implementing these strategies, the research community can effectively support and onboard new authors entering LLM research, fostering a collaborative and inclusive research environment.

What are the potential risks and downsides of the observed reduction in industry publishing and increased secrecy around LLM models, and how can the community mitigate these issues?

The observed reduction in industry publishing and increased secrecy around Large Language Model (LLM) models pose several risks and downsides for the research community:

Reduced Transparency: Decreased industry publishing and increased secrecy can lead to reduced transparency in LLM research. This lack of transparency hinders reproducibility, peer review, and the advancement of knowledge in the field.

Inequality in Access: Industry secrecy may result in unequal access to cutting-edge LLM models and datasets, limiting the ability of researchers to evaluate, replicate, and build upon industry-developed models. This can create disparities in research capabilities and outcomes.

Stifled Innovation: Industry secrecy and reduced publishing may stifle innovation by limiting the dissemination of new ideas, methodologies, and findings. Open collaboration and sharing of research findings are essential for driving innovation in the field.

Ethical Concerns: Increased secrecy around LLM models raises ethical concerns related to accountability, bias, and potential misuse of AI technologies. Lack of transparency can make it challenging to assess the ethical implications of LLM applications.

To mitigate these issues, the research community can take the following steps:

Advocate for Open Science: Encourage industry partners to adopt open science practices, such as open-access publishing, sharing of code and data, and transparent reporting of research findings. Promote a culture of openness and collaboration in LLM research.

Community Guidelines: Develop community guidelines and standards for LLM research that emphasize transparency, reproducibility, and ethical considerations. Encourage researchers to adhere to these guidelines in their work.

Regulatory Oversight: Advocate for regulatory oversight and policies that promote transparency and accountability in AI research and development. Engage with policymakers to address concerns related to industry secrecy and data privacy.

Collaborative Initiatives: Foster collaborative initiatives between academia, industry, and other stakeholders to promote knowledge sharing, research collaboration, and responsible AI development. Encourage cross-sector partnerships to address common challenges in LLM research.

By addressing these risks and promoting a culture of openness and collaboration, the research community can navigate the challenges posed by reduced industry publishing and increased secrecy in LLM research.

Given the limited cross-country collaboration observed, especially between the US and China, what are the broader implications for the development and governance of large language models in an increasingly competitive global landscape?

The limited cross-country collaboration observed, particularly between the US and China, has significant implications for the development and governance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in a competitive global landscape:

Knowledge Sharing and Innovation: Cross-country collaboration fosters knowledge sharing, innovation, and the exchange of best practices in LLM research. By collaborating across borders, researchers can leverage diverse expertise, resources, and perspectives to advance the field.

Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks: Collaborative efforts between countries can facilitate the development of common ethical and regulatory frameworks for the governance of LLMs. International collaboration is essential for addressing ethical concerns, ensuring responsible AI deployment, and harmonizing regulatory standards.

Geopolitical Dynamics: The lack of collaboration between the US and China in LLM research reflects broader geopolitical tensions and competition in the AI domain. These dynamics can impact research agendas, funding priorities, and technology transfer between countries.

Innovation Ecosystems: Collaborative research initiatives between countries contribute to the growth of global innovation ecosystems. By fostering partnerships and collaborations, researchers can leverage complementary strengths and resources to drive technological advancements in LLMs.

Risk of Fragmentation: Without robust cross-country collaboration, there is a risk of fragmentation in LLM research efforts, leading to duplication of work, inefficiencies, and missed opportunities for collective progress. Collaboration can help mitigate these risks and promote synergies in research endeavors.

To address these implications, stakeholders in the LLM research community should prioritize efforts to promote international collaboration, knowledge exchange, and cooperation across borders. By fostering a culture of collaboration and inclusivity, researchers can navigate the challenges of a competitive global landscape and work towards the responsible development and governance of LLMs.