toplogo
Sign In

Privacy-Preserving Billing for Local Energy Markets Considering Participants' Deviations and Grid Locations


Core Concepts
PBP-LEM enables a group of market entities to jointly compute participants' bills in a decentralized and privacy-preserving manner, considering their energy volume deviations from bids and their locations on the grid.
Abstract
The paper proposes a privacy-preserving billing protocol, PBP-LEM, for local energy markets (LEMs) that takes into account market participants' energy volume deviations from their bids and their locations on the grid. Key highlights: PBP-LEM utilizes an efficient and privacy-preserving individual billing scheme (EPIB) that achieves information-theoretic security as a building block. PBP-LEM involves a collaboration of different entities performing bill computation with verification of correctness, mitigating the potential impact on individuals' privacy resulting from internal collusion. PBP-LEM incorporates participants' locations on the grid to distribute deviation costs fairly and accounts for distribution network usage fees in the participants' bills. PBP-LEM presents three different approaches, resulting in varying levels of privacy and performance, and evaluates their computation and communication complexity under two security settings (honest-majority and dishonest-majority MPC).
Stats
The total deviation of the entire LEM area at trading period tpk is denoted as T tpk. The zonal deviation weight at tpk is denoted as W tpk. The network fee for exporting and importing energy in zone z at tpk is denoted as NF z,tpk p and NF z,tpk c , respectively.
Quotes
"PBP-LEM integrates the following features: (i) it charges for market participants who fail to fulfil their bid commitments, (ii) it incorporates the participants' locations on the grid to distribute deviation costs fairly and accounts for distribution network usage fees in the participants' bills, (iii) it does not rely on a single trusted party to compute individual bills, (iv) it mitigates the impact of potential collusion among internal parties by ensuring that only less sensitive data might be revealed in the event of such collusion, and (v) it protects all participants' private data including their types of participation."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Eman Alqahta... at arxiv.org 04-25-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.15886.pdf
Privacy-Preserving Billing for Local Energy Markets (Long Version)

Deeper Inquiries

How can PBP-LEM be extended to handle dynamic pricing in the local energy market, where the trading price changes based on real-time supply and demand

To extend PBP-LEM to handle dynamic pricing in the local energy market, where the trading price changes based on real-time supply and demand, several adjustments and enhancements can be made. One approach is to incorporate real-time data feeds into the protocol to update the trading price dynamically. This can involve integrating APIs or data streams from market operators or grid operators to reflect the current market conditions. Additionally, the protocol can be modified to include adaptive algorithms that adjust the pricing calculations based on the changing supply and demand dynamics. This could involve implementing machine learning models or algorithms that analyze the real-time data and make pricing decisions accordingly. Furthermore, introducing smart contracts or automated bidding mechanisms can enable users to adjust their bids in response to the changing prices, ensuring a more efficient and responsive market environment. By incorporating these dynamic pricing mechanisms, PBP-LEM can better reflect the real-time conditions of the local energy market and optimize trading outcomes for participants.

What are the potential challenges and trade-offs in implementing PBP-LEM in a large-scale, geographically distributed local energy market

Implementing PBP-LEM in a large-scale, geographically distributed local energy market poses several challenges and trade-offs. One major challenge is scalability, as the protocol needs to handle a larger number of participants, transactions, and data points in a distributed environment. This can lead to increased computational complexity and communication overhead, requiring robust infrastructure and efficient algorithms to ensure timely and accurate billing calculations. Another challenge is ensuring data privacy and security across a geographically distributed market. With data being transmitted and processed across multiple entities and locations, there is a higher risk of data breaches or privacy violations. Implementing strong encryption techniques, secure communication channels, and access control mechanisms is crucial to safeguarding sensitive information in a distributed setting. Trade-offs may arise in terms of performance, as the increased scale of the market can impact the speed and efficiency of the billing process. Balancing privacy requirements with computational efficiency and scalability is essential to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the protocol in a large-scale deployment. Additionally, coordinating and aligning the interests of multiple stakeholders, such as users, suppliers, and market operators, in a geographically distributed market can present governance and coordination challenges that need to be addressed for successful implementation.

How can the privacy-preserving techniques used in PBP-LEM be applied to other energy market applications, such as demand-side management or grid balancing

The privacy-preserving techniques used in PBP-LEM can be applied to other energy market applications, such as demand-side management or grid balancing, to enhance data security and confidentiality while enabling efficient operations. By leveraging techniques like multiparty computation, functional encryption, and Pedersen commitments, these applications can protect sensitive information and ensure privacy in data exchange and computation processes. In demand-side management, where energy consumption patterns and user behavior data are crucial for optimizing energy usage, privacy-preserving techniques can enable utilities and service providers to analyze and manage demand without compromising individual privacy. By encrypting and securely processing data, users can share information for demand response programs or load forecasting while maintaining confidentiality. Similarly, in grid balancing, where real-time adjustments are needed to maintain grid stability and efficiency, privacy-preserving protocols can facilitate secure data sharing among grid operators, energy suppliers, and consumers. By anonymizing and protecting grid data, such as load profiles and generation patterns, while allowing for collaborative computations, grid balancing operations can be enhanced without exposing sensitive information. Overall, the application of privacy-preserving techniques in these energy market scenarios can support data-driven decision-making, enhance trust among stakeholders, and ensure compliance with privacy regulations, ultimately leading to more secure and efficient energy market operations.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star