toplogo
Sign In

Neural Histogram Layers for Extracting Informative "Engineered" Features


Core Concepts
The core message of this work is that neural network layers can be designed to learn histogram-based "engineered" features, such as local binary patterns and edge histogram descriptors, which can improve feature representation and performance on image classification tasks.
Abstract
The paper explores whether effective "engineered" histogram-based features from the computer vision literature, such as local binary patterns (LBP) and edge histogram descriptors (EHD), can be learned through neural network layers. The authors present neural versions of LBP (NLBP) and EHD (NEHD) that jointly improve the feature representation and perform image classification. The key highlights and insights are: Directory: Introduction Before deep learning, feature engineering played a vital role in computer vision and machine learning Examples of engineered features include LBP and EHD Deep learning automates the feature extraction process, but has some limitations Related Work Overview of "engineered" histogram features like LBP and EHD Combination of traditional and deep learning approaches Method Neural "Engineered" Features Histogram Layer Neural Edge Histogram Descriptor (NEHD) Neural Local Binary Pattern (NLBP) Experimental Setup Ablation study and feature comparison experiments Results and Discussion Ablation study on initialization and parameter learning for NEHD and NLBP Multichannel processing approaches for NEHD and NLBP Comparison of neural and "engineered" features across datasets The proposed neural "engineered" features (NEHD and NLBP) outperform the baseline "engineered" features (EHD and LBP) across benchmark and real-world datasets. The neural versions provide flexibility, expressibility, synergy between structural and statistical textures, and utility for learning powerful histogram-based features.
Stats
None.
Quotes
"Histograms are used throughout computer vision and machine learning as a method to aggregate intensity and/or feature values as well as relationships between neighboring inputs (e.g., edge orientation, pixel differences)." "To mitigate these issues associated with traditional and deep learning features, alternative models have been introduced that take inspiration from both approaches." "The spatial location of the responses align properly as shown in Figure 2. The no edge response of the NEHD and EHD feature maps are nearly the same."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Joshua Peepl... at arxiv.org 03-27-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.17176.pdf
Histogram Layers for Neural Engineered Features

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed neural "engineered" feature layers be integrated into deeper neural network architectures to further improve performance on various computer vision tasks?

The proposed neural "engineered" feature layers, such as NEHD and NLBP, can be seamlessly integrated into deeper neural network architectures to further enhance performance on a variety of computer vision tasks. Some key ways to leverage these layers include: Modular Integration: The NEHD and NLBP layers can be used as modular components within a larger deep learning pipeline. By inserting these layers at strategic points in the network, they can capture and encode important structural and statistical texture information that can complement the features learned by the convolutional and pooling layers. End-to-End Training: Since the proposed layers are differentiable, they can be trained jointly with the rest of the deep neural network in an end-to-end fashion. This allows the network to adaptively learn the optimal combination of the neural "engineered" features and the other learned representations for the target task. Multi-Scale Fusion: The neural "engineered" feature layers can be applied at multiple scales of the network, capturing texture information at different levels of abstraction. This multi-scale fusion can lead to richer feature representations that are more robust and discriminative. Transfer Learning: The pre-trained neural "engineered" feature layers can be leveraged as powerful feature extractors and transferred to other computer vision tasks, similar to how pre-trained convolutional layers are used in transfer learning. This can be especially beneficial when the target dataset is small, allowing the network to benefit from the texture-aware representations. Interpretability: The neural "engineered" feature layers provide a degree of interpretability, as the structural and statistical texture information they capture can be more easily understood compared to the opaque representations learned by standard convolutional layers. This can be valuable for applications that require explainable AI. By integrating the proposed neural "engineered" feature layers into deeper architectures, researchers and practitioners can harness the complementary strengths of learned and handcrafted features, leading to improved performance on a wide range of computer vision tasks, such as image classification, segmentation, object detection, and beyond.

What other powerful histogram-based features could be discovered by training the neural "engineered" feature layers introduced in this work?

The neural "engineered" feature layers introduced in this work, such as NEHD and NLBP, provide a flexible and generalizable framework for learning a variety of powerful histogram-based features. Beyond the specific implementations of LBP and EHD, there are several other histogram-based features that could be discovered by training these layers: Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG): Similar to the EHD feature, the neural "engineered" feature layer could be used to learn a differentiable version of the HOG descriptor, which captures the distribution of intensity gradients in an image. This could lead to improved performance on tasks like object detection and human activity recognition. Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM): The GLCM feature captures the spatial relationship between neighboring pixels, providing information about the texture of an image. A neural version of the GLCM feature could be learned using the proposed histogram layer, potentially enhancing performance on texture-based classification and segmentation tasks. Haralick Texture Features: The Haralick texture features are a comprehensive set of statistical measures derived from the GLCM, including contrast, correlation, energy, and homogeneity. Training the neural "engineered" feature layer to learn these Haralick-inspired features could lead to powerful texture representations. Wavelet-based Histogram Features: Combining the proposed histogram layer with wavelet decomposition could enable the learning of multi-scale, frequency-aware histogram-based features. This could be particularly useful for tasks involving complex, multi-resolution textures. Task-Specific Histogram Features: The flexibility of the neural "engineered" feature layer allows for the discovery of histogram-based features that are tailored to the specific requirements of a given computer vision task. By designing appropriate structural and statistical texture extraction components, novel histogram-based features could be learned to optimize performance on specialized applications. The key advantage of the proposed framework is its ability to learn histogram-based features in an end-to-end, data-driven manner. This allows the network to adaptively discover the most informative histogram-based representations for the problem at hand, going beyond the traditional, manually-engineered histogram features. As such, the potential for discovering powerful, novel histogram-based features is vast, with applications spanning a wide range of computer vision and related domains.

How can the insights from this work on combining structural and statistical texture features be applied to other domains beyond computer vision, such as audio processing or time series analysis?

The insights gained from the proposed neural "engineered" feature layers, which combine structural and statistical texture information, can be readily applied to domains beyond computer vision, such as audio processing and time series analysis. The key principles underlying the integration of these two complementary texture representations can be adapted to effectively capture and leverage similar patterns in other data modalities. Audio Processing: In the audio domain, the structural texture information can be represented by the spectral and temporal characteristics of the signal, such as the distribution of frequency components and the evolution of these components over time. The statistical texture information, on the other hand, can be captured by the histograms of various audio features, such as mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), spectral centroid, and zero-crossing rates. By combining these structural and statistical representations using a neural "engineered" feature layer, improved performance can be achieved on tasks like audio classification, speech recognition, and music genre identification. Time Series Analysis: In the context of time series data, the structural texture information can be represented by the patterns and trends observed in the signal, such as the shape of the waveform, the presence of periodic components, and the relationships between different time series features. The statistical texture information can be captured by the histograms of various time series characteristics, such as the distribution of values, the distribution of changes between consecutive time points, and the distribution of higher-order statistics (e.g., variance, skewness, kurtosis). By combining these structural and statistical representations using a neural "engineered" feature layer, improved performance can be achieved on tasks like time series classification, anomaly detection, and forecasting. Multimodal Integration: The insights from this work can also be applied to the integration of multiple data modalities, such as combining visual, audio, and time series data for enhanced performance on complex tasks. By leveraging the neural "engineered" feature layers to capture the structural and statistical texture information within each modality, and then fusing these representations, the network can learn a more comprehensive and robust feature representation that exploits the complementary information across the different data sources. The key advantage of the neural "engineered" feature layer approach is its flexibility and generalizability. The principles of combining structural and statistical texture information can be adapted to various data types and domains, allowing researchers and practitioners to discover powerful feature representations that can lead to improved performance on a wide range of applications, beyond the computer vision focus of the original work.
0