toplogo
Sign In

Addressing Ambiguity in 360° Room Layout Estimation via Bi-Layout Prediction


Core Concepts
Our Bi-Layout model can effectively predict two distinct room layout types (enclosed and extended) to address the inherent ambiguity in existing datasets, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
Abstract

The paper addresses the inherent ambiguity issue in existing 360° room layout estimation datasets, where the ground truth annotations can be either of an "enclosed" type that stops at ambiguous regions or an "extended" type that encompasses all visible areas.

To tackle this challenge, the authors propose a novel Bi-Layout model that can simultaneously predict two distinct layout types. The key innovations are:

  1. The model employs two separate global context embeddings to capture the contextual information for each layout type.
  2. A shared feature guidance module is introduced to effectively fuse the image feature with the relevant global context embedding, guiding the prediction of the corresponding layout type.

This unique architectural design allows the model to be compact and efficient while addressing the ambiguity issue. The authors also introduce a new "disambiguate" metric to quantitatively evaluate the model's ability to handle ambiguous annotations without the need for manual correction.

Extensive experiments on the MatterportLayout and ZInD datasets demonstrate that the proposed Bi-Layout model outperforms state-of-the-art methods, especially on subsets with significant ambiguity. The model can also inherently detect ambiguous regions by comparing the two layout predictions.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
The average depth error between the predicted and ground truth depth maps is less than 1 meter. The average normal direction error is less than 10 degrees. The average room height prediction error is less than 0.5 meters.
Quotes
"Our Bi-Layout model can inherently detect ambiguous regions by comparing the two layout predictions." "Extensive experiments on the MatterportLayout and ZInD datasets demonstrate that the proposed Bi-Layout model outperforms state-of-the-art methods, especially on subsets with significant ambiguity."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Yu-Ju Tsai,J... at arxiv.org 04-16-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.09993.pdf
No More Ambiguity in 360° Room Layout via Bi-Layout Estimation

Deeper Inquiries

How can the Bi-Layout model's ability to detect ambiguous regions be leveraged in practical applications

The Bi-Layout model's ability to detect ambiguous regions can be leveraged in various practical applications in the field of computer vision and indoor scene understanding. Improved Accuracy: By detecting ambiguous regions, the model can provide more accurate and reliable predictions, especially in scenarios where traditional models struggle due to annotation ambiguity. This can lead to better decision-making in applications such as room layout reconstruction, object placement, and scene understanding. User Interaction: In interactive applications, the model can highlight ambiguous regions and allow users to provide feedback or select the most suitable prediction based on their specific requirements. This can enhance user experience and customization in applications like virtual room design or augmented reality. Quality Control: The ability to detect ambiguous regions can also be used for quality control purposes. It can help in identifying areas where the model may be uncertain or where manual intervention is required, ensuring the overall reliability and accuracy of the system. Adaptability: The model's capability to detect ambiguity can be leveraged in adaptive systems that adjust their predictions based on the level of certainty in different regions of the input data. This can lead to more robust and flexible applications in dynamic environments.

What other types of layout annotations or representations could be incorporated into the Bi-Layout model to further improve its performance

To further improve the performance of the Bi-Layout model, additional types of layout annotations or representations can be incorporated into the model. Some potential options include: Hierarchical Layouts: Introducing hierarchical representations that capture the layout at different levels of granularity, such as room-level, furniture-level, and object-level layouts. This can provide a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of the scene. Semantic Layouts: Incorporating semantic information into the layout annotations, such as labeling different regions based on their functions (e.g., kitchen, living room, bedroom). This can enhance the model's ability to understand the purpose and usage of different areas within a room. Temporal Layouts: Extending the model to handle temporal layouts, where the layout of a room may change over time. This can be useful in applications where dynamic scene understanding is required, such as monitoring room occupancy or tracking object movements. Multi-Modal Layouts: Integrating multiple modalities, such as depth information, thermal imaging, or audio data, to enrich the layout representations. This can provide a more comprehensive view of the scene and improve the model's robustness in diverse environments. By incorporating these additional types of layout annotations or representations, the Bi-Layout model can enhance its performance and versatility in various applications.

How can the proposed approach be extended to handle more complex room layouts, such as those with multiple rooms or non-Manhattan-world assumptions

The proposed approach can be extended to handle more complex room layouts, such as those with multiple rooms or non-Manhattan-world assumptions, by incorporating the following strategies: Multi-Room Layouts: To handle layouts with multiple rooms, the model can be modified to predict room boundaries and relationships between different rooms. This can involve hierarchical modeling to capture the spatial arrangement of multiple rooms within a scene. Non-Manhattan-World Assumptions: For layouts that do not adhere to the Manhattan-world assumption, the model can be trained on a diverse set of data with varying layout configurations. Additionally, incorporating non-linear transformations or deformations in the model architecture can help capture the complexity of such layouts. Graph-based Representations: Utilizing graph-based representations to model the spatial relationships between different elements in the room layout. This can enable the model to capture complex dependencies and interactions in non-Manhattan layouts more effectively. Attention Mechanisms: Leveraging attention mechanisms to focus on relevant parts of the input data and learn long-range dependencies in the layout prediction process. This can help the model handle intricate room layouts with non-standard geometries. By incorporating these extensions and adaptations, the Bi-Layout model can be tailored to handle a wider range of room layouts, including those with multiple rooms and non-Manhattan-world assumptions, while maintaining high accuracy and robustness.
0
star