toplogo
Sign In

Efficient Semi-Supervised Table Detection in Document Images using Semantic Aligned Matching Transformer


Core Concepts
Our novel semi-supervised approach employing SAM-DETR effectively reduces false positives and substantially enhances table detection performance, particularly in complex documents with diverse table structures.
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel semi-supervised approach for table detection in document images. The key highlights are: The approach eliminates the need for object proposals and post-processing techniques like Non-maximal Suppression (NMS), which are common in previous CNN-based semi-supervised methods. It is the first network that optimizes the matching process between object queries and corresponding target features in a semi-supervised setting, using the SAM-DETR detector. Comprehensive evaluations on four diverse datasets - PubLayNet, ICDAR-19, TableBank, and Pubtables - demonstrate that the proposed semi-supervised approach achieves results comparable to CNN-based and transformer-based semi-supervised methods without requiring object proposal processes and Non-maximal Suppression (NMS) in post-processing. The intrinsic flexibility of this method enables consistent and reliable performance in various scenarios, including diverse table sizes and scales, within a semi-supervised learning context. The framework creates a reinforcing loop where the Teacher model consistently guides and improves the Student model, leading to enhanced table detection performance.
Stats
Table detection can substantially improve document analysis and visual summarization workflows. Deep learning methods have shown significant improvements over traditional rule-based approaches, but they rely heavily on large labeled datasets for effective training. Semi-supervised learning methods have emerged as a solution to the challenge of insufficient labeled data for deep learning applications. Previous semi-supervised methods often employ CNN-based detectors with anchor proposals and post-processing techniques like non-maximal suppression (NMS). Recent advancements in transformer-based techniques have eliminated the need for NMS and emphasized object queries and attention mechanisms.
Quotes
"To address these challenges, we introduce a semi-supervised approach employing SAM-DETR, a novel approach for precise alignment between object queries and target features." "Our approach demonstrates remarkable reductions in false positives and substantial enhancements in table detection performance, particularly in complex documents characterized by diverse table structures."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed semi-supervised approach be extended to handle other types of document objects beyond tables, such as figures and formulas?

In order to extend the proposed semi-supervised approach to handle other types of document objects like figures and formulas, the model architecture and training process can be adapted. Here are some key steps to consider: Data Annotation: Annotated datasets containing figures and formulas need to be prepared. These annotations should include bounding boxes or segmentation masks for the respective objects. Model Modification: The model architecture can be adjusted to accommodate the detection of multiple types of objects. This may involve adding additional output heads to the model for different object classes. Training Strategy: The training strategy should be modified to incorporate the detection of figures and formulas alongside tables. This may involve adjusting the loss functions and evaluation metrics to account for the new object classes. Pseudo-labeling: Similar to the approach used for table detection, pseudo-labeling can be employed for figures and formulas. Unlabeled data can be used to generate pseudo-labels, which are then utilized in the training process. Semantic Alignment: The semantic alignment mechanism in the SAM-DETR detector can be fine-tuned to better align object queries with features specific to figures and formulas. This can improve the model's accuracy in detecting these objects. By implementing these modifications and enhancements, the semi-supervised approach can be extended to effectively handle a wider range of document objects beyond tables.

How can the potential limitations of the semantic alignment mechanism in the SAM-DETR detector be further improved to handle more complex document layouts?

While the semantic alignment mechanism in the SAM-DETR detector is effective, there are potential limitations that can be addressed to handle more complex document layouts: Adaptive Attention Mechanism: Introducing an adaptive attention mechanism that dynamically adjusts the alignment strategy based on the complexity of the document layout can improve performance. Multi-Scale Feature Fusion: Incorporating multi-scale feature fusion techniques can enhance the model's ability to capture intricate details in complex layouts, improving semantic alignment. Contextual Information Integration: Integrating contextual information from surrounding objects or elements in the document can provide additional cues for semantic alignment, especially in scenarios with overlapping or intricate layouts. Iterative Refinement: Implementing an iterative refinement process where the model revisits and refines the alignment between object queries and features can help handle ambiguities in complex layouts. Attention Masking: Utilizing attention masking techniques to focus on specific regions of interest within the document layout can improve the precision of semantic alignment. By incorporating these strategies and techniques, the semantic alignment mechanism in the SAM-DETR detector can be further improved to effectively handle more complex document layouts.

Given the success of the semi-supervised framework in table detection, how could it be adapted to address other document analysis tasks, such as document classification or information extraction, where labeled data is scarce?

The successful semi-supervised framework used in table detection can be adapted to address other document analysis tasks with scarce labeled data by following these steps: Task-Specific Data Preparation: Prepare annotated datasets for the specific document analysis tasks such as document classification or information extraction. This may involve labeling documents with relevant categories or extracting key information for training. Model Modification: Modify the existing model architecture to suit the requirements of the new tasks. This may involve adjusting the output layers, loss functions, and evaluation metrics to align with the objectives of document classification or information extraction. Pseudo-Labeling Strategy: Implement a pseudo-labeling strategy similar to the one used for table detection. Generate pseudo-labels for unlabeled data in the new task domain and incorporate them into the training process. Semantic Alignment Optimization: Fine-tune the semantic alignment mechanism in the SAM-DETR detector to align with the specific features and structures relevant to document classification or information extraction tasks. Transfer Learning: Utilize transfer learning techniques to leverage the knowledge gained from the semi-supervised framework in table detection and apply it to the new document analysis tasks. This can help in adapting the model to new tasks with limited labeled data. By adapting the semi-supervised framework with these considerations, it can be effectively utilized for other document analysis tasks beyond table detection, where labeled data is scarce.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star