Core Concepts
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) integrated with Visibility Graph (VG) and Vector Visibility Graph (VVG) representations of ECG signals can effectively classify cardiac arrhythmias without the need for preprocessing or noise removal.
Abstract
The study explores the use of Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) for arrhythmia classification in electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. It investigates the integration of two graph representation methods, Visibility Graph (VG) and Vector Visibility Graph (VVG), to transform ECG signals into graph structures.
Key highlights:
The VG and VVG methods are used to map ECG signals into graph representations, capturing the intrinsic characteristics and relationships within the waveforms.
Various GCN architectures are evaluated and compared to Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) baselines for arrhythmia classification performance.
Experiments are conducted under the inter-patient and intra-patient evaluation paradigms to assess the generalization capabilities of the proposed approach.
The results demonstrate that GCNs, when combined with VG and VVG representations, can effectively classify arrhythmias without the need for extensive preprocessing or noise removal from ECG signals.
While both VG and VVG methods show promise, the VG approach is found to be more efficient computationally.
The proposed methodology is competitive compared to baseline methods, although classifying the supraventricular ectopic beat (S) class remains challenging, especially under the inter-patient paradigm.
The computational complexity, particularly with the VVG method, required data balancing and sophisticated implementation strategies.
Stats
The study used the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, which contains 48 ECG signal records of 30 minutes each from 47 patients, sampled at 360 Hz with two leads.
Quotes
"Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), when integrated with VG and VVG for signal graph mapping, can classify arrhythmias without the need for preprocessing or noise removal from ECG signals."
"While both VG and VVG methods show promise, VG is notably more efficient."