toplogo
Sign In

Iconic Gesture Semantics: Bridging the Gap Between Visual and Linguistic Meaning


Core Concepts
Iconic gestures convey meaning through their visual properties, which can interact with the semantics of accompanying speech. This paper proposes a unified framework to formally model the semantics of iconic gestures and their integration with verbal meaning.
Abstract
The paper introduces an iconic gesture semantics that aims to reconcile the ambivalent nature of iconic gestures - their verbal and nonverbal characteristics. It starts by highlighting the key desiderata for an iconic gesture semantics: Gesture interpretation is strongly dependent on the accompanying speech (affiliate dependence). Speech-gesture affiliation is regimented by (in-)congruency. Gesture interpretation is an instance of visual communication, which rests on a perceptual interpretation of gestural forms. To capture the visual content of iconic gestures, the paper adopts a vector space model. It first introduces a kinematic representation of gestures based on features like handshape, orientation, movement trajectory, and synchronization. This kinematic representation is then mapped onto vector sequences in a vectorial gesture space, which is modeled as an oriented vector space aligned with the speaker's anatomical planes. The paper then proposes a shift in semantic architecture, arguing that iconic models and semantic predicates are linked via a semiotic relation of "extended exemplification" (extemplification). This allows the paper to explain the relation between labeling and spatial theories of iconic gesture semantics. The extemplification-based interpretation brings iconic gestures to a quasi-linguistic status that can interact with verbal meaning, mainly driven by lexical knowledge. The paper discusses the implications of this iconic gesture semantics for semantic theorizing in general, noting that it cannot be fully spelled out within a standard Frege/Montague framework. It provides a heuristic for interpreting gestures within possible worlds semantics instead.
Stats
"as we see them, we see something in them." Iconic gestures can add shape information to the meaning of accompanying speech, e.g. interpreting "staircases" as "spiral staircases" based on the gesture. Iconic gestures exhibit both verbal and nonverbal characteristics, leading to ambivalence in existing semantic theories.
Quotes
"So You Think Gestures are Nonverbal?" "as we see them, we see something in them."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Andy... at arxiv.org 04-30-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.18708.pdf
Iconic Gesture Semantics

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed iconic gesture semantics be extended to account for other types of gestures beyond the iconic ones, such as deictic or metaphoric gestures?

In order to extend the proposed iconic gesture semantics to encompass other types of gestures like deictic or metaphoric gestures, a comprehensive framework needs to be developed that can accommodate the unique characteristics and interpretations of each gesture type. Deictic Gestures: Deictic gestures involve pointing or referencing specific objects or locations in space. To incorporate deictic gestures into the iconic gesture semantics framework, a mapping between the physical movements of the gesture and the spatial references they indicate needs to be established. This mapping can be achieved by defining vectors that represent the direction and distance of the pointing gestures in relation to the speaker's body or the surrounding environment. Metaphoric Gestures: Metaphoric gestures convey abstract concepts or ideas through symbolic movements. Extending the iconic gesture semantics to include metaphoric gestures would require a deeper analysis of the symbolic meanings associated with different gesture forms. This could involve mapping metaphorical gestures to conceptual domains and establishing connections between the visual properties of the gestures and their intended metaphorical interpretations. By incorporating specific mappings and interpretations for deictic and metaphoric gestures within the iconic gesture semantics framework, a more comprehensive understanding of multimodal communication can be achieved, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of gesture-speech interactions.

How might the insights from iconic gesture semantics inform the development of multimodal interfaces and human-computer interaction systems?

The insights from iconic gesture semantics can significantly impact the development of multimodal interfaces and human-computer interaction systems by enhancing the naturalness, efficiency, and effectiveness of communication between users and machines. Improved User Experience: By understanding the underlying principles of iconic gestures and their interaction with verbal content, designers can create more intuitive and user-friendly interfaces that leverage gestures as a natural mode of communication. This can lead to enhanced user experiences and increased user engagement with the system. Enhanced Gesture Recognition: Insights from iconic gesture semantics can inform the development of advanced gesture recognition algorithms that can accurately interpret and respond to a wide range of gestures, including iconic, deictic, and metaphoric gestures. This can improve the overall usability and responsiveness of multimodal interfaces. Personalized Interaction: By incorporating the nuances of gesture semantics into human-computer interaction systems, developers can tailor the system's responses and feedback based on the specific gestures used by individual users. This personalized interaction can lead to more adaptive and context-aware interfaces. Efficient Communication: Understanding the semantic underpinnings of gestures can facilitate more efficient and effective communication in multimodal interfaces. By aligning gesture interpretations with verbal content, systems can better understand user intentions and provide more accurate responses, leading to smoother interactions. Overall, leveraging the insights from iconic gesture semantics can pave the way for the development of more sophisticated and user-centric multimodal interfaces and human-computer interaction systems that enhance communication and interaction between users and technology.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star