toplogo
Sign In

Unsupervised Compositional Neural Representation for Texture Editing


Core Concepts
This work introduces a fully unsupervised approach for representing textures using a compositional neural model that captures individual textons as a composition of 2D Gaussian functions with associated appearance features. This representation enables a wide range of texture editing applications.
Abstract
The authors present a neural representation that decomposes textures into geometric elements (textons) and appearance features in an unsupervised manner. Each texton is represented as a 2D Gaussian function with an associated appearance feature vector. This compositional representation offers both expressiveness and ease of editing, as textures can be edited by modifying the Gaussians within the latent space. The key components of the approach are: Encoding textures as a composition of Gaussians: The encoder maps an input texture into a structured latent representation consisting of a set of Gaussians, where each Gaussian represents a texton. The encoder architecture includes an appearance encoder, a segmentation network, and a Gaussian parameter estimation layer. Gaussian splatting: The Gaussian splatting layer converts the latent Gaussians into a feature grid, which is then fed into a generator network to reconstruct the original texture. Unsupervised compositional texton learning: The authors introduce three key components to learn the compositional neural textons in an unsupervised manner: Appearance reshuffling: Randomly reshuffling the appearance features of the Gaussians, while preserving the overall texture appearance, to enforce the reshuffling invariance property. Disentangling structure and appearance: Applying a consistency loss to ensure that the encoding of image transformations is consistent with the transformations applied directly to the Gaussians, promoting the disentanglement of structure and appearance. Enforcing desired texton properties: Applying losses to encourage discrete objectness, spatial compactness, reshuffling invariance, and transformation equivariance of the learned textons. The proposed compositional neural texture representation enables a wide range of texture editing applications, including texture transfer, image stylization, texture interpolation and morphing, revealing/modifying texture variations, edit propagation, and direct manipulation of textons.
Stats
"Textures can be edited by modifying the compositional Gaussians within the latent space, and new textures can be efficiently synthesized by feeding the modified Gaussians through a generator network in a feed-forward manner." "Our representation is human-intelligible, applicable to a wide range of textures that exhibit sufficient self-repetitions, and enhancing a variety of editing techniques."
Quotes
"Textures can be edited by modifying the compositional Gaussians within the latent space, and new textures can be efficiently synthesized by feeding the modified Gaussians through a generator network in a feed-forward manner." "Our representation is human-intelligible, applicable to a wide range of textures that exhibit sufficient self-repetitions, and enhancing a variety of editing techniques."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Peihan Tu,Li... at arxiv.org 04-22-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.12509.pdf
Compositional Neural Textures

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed compositional neural texture representation be extended to handle more complex, non-stationary textures that do not exhibit sufficient self-repetitions

To extend the proposed compositional neural texture representation to handle more complex, non-stationary textures that lack sufficient self-repetitions, several strategies can be employed: Augmented Data Generation: By incorporating data augmentation techniques such as rotation, scaling, and flipping, the model can be exposed to a wider variety of textures, including non-stationary ones. This augmented data can help the model learn to represent and manipulate diverse textures effectively. Adaptive Gaussian Modeling: Instead of relying solely on fixed Gaussian representations, the model can adaptively adjust the shape and number of Gaussians based on the complexity and variability of the texture. This adaptive modeling can help capture the intricate details and variations present in non-stationary textures. Hierarchical Texton Representation: Introducing a hierarchical structure to the texton representation can enable the model to capture textures at multiple scales and levels of abstraction. This hierarchical approach can better handle the complexity and non-stationarity of textures by representing them in a more structured and organized manner. Incorporating Spatial Context: By considering the spatial relationships and context between textons, the model can better understand the overall texture composition and arrangement. This spatial context can help in capturing the non-stationary nature of textures and improving the representation of complex patterns and variations. Advanced Feature Encoding: Enhancing the feature encoding process with more advanced techniques such as attention mechanisms, graph neural networks, or self-supervised learning can enable the model to extract more informative and discriminative features from non-stationary textures. These advanced features can enhance the representation and manipulation of complex textures.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of the Gaussian-based texton representation, and how could they be addressed in future work

While the Gaussian-based texton representation offers several advantages, such as interpretability, ease of manipulation, and structured decomposition of textures, there are potential limitations and drawbacks that should be considered: Limited Expressiveness: Gaussian textons may struggle to capture highly complex or irregular textures that do not conform well to Gaussian distributions. Addressing this limitation could involve exploring more flexible distribution models or incorporating non-Gaussian components into the representation. Sensitivity to Noise: Gaussian textons may be sensitive to noise or outliers in the data, leading to suboptimal representations. Robust methods for handling noise and outliers, such as robust statistics or outlier detection techniques, could help mitigate this issue. Scalability: As the complexity and size of the texture dataset increase, the scalability of the Gaussian-based representation may become a concern. Implementing efficient algorithms for handling large-scale datasets and optimizing the computational performance of the model can address scalability issues. Limited Generalization: The Gaussian-based representation may struggle to generalize well to unseen or diverse textures that significantly differ from the training data. Incorporating techniques for domain adaptation, transfer learning, or data augmentation can improve the generalization capabilities of the model. To address these limitations, future work could focus on exploring hybrid models that combine Gaussian-based representations with more flexible and adaptive components, integrating advanced machine learning techniques to enhance the robustness and expressiveness of the texton representation.

How could the unsupervised learning approach be combined with limited human supervision or guidance to further improve the quality and interpretability of the learned textons

Combining the unsupervised learning approach with limited human supervision or guidance can enhance the quality and interpretability of the learned textons in the following ways: Semi-Supervised Learning: By incorporating a small amount of labeled data or human annotations into the training process, the model can learn from both unsupervised and supervised signals. This hybrid approach can improve the quality of the learned textons and provide additional guidance for the model. Interactive Editing Interfaces: Developing interactive interfaces that allow users to provide feedback or corrections to the generated textons can help refine the representation based on human input. This interactive feedback loop can improve the interpretability and relevance of the learned textons. Weakly Supervised Constraints: Introducing weakly supervised constraints or priors based on domain knowledge or expert guidance can guide the learning process and enforce meaningful structures in the texton representation. These constraints can help steer the model towards learning more relevant and interpretable textons. Human-Centric Evaluation: Incorporating human-centric evaluation metrics or user studies to assess the quality and utility of the learned textons can provide valuable insights for refining the representation. Understanding how humans perceive and interact with the texton representation can guide improvements and optimizations. By integrating limited human supervision or guidance into the unsupervised learning framework, the model can benefit from additional insights, constraints, and feedback to enhance the quality, interpretability, and usability of the learned textons.
0