Sign In

Stability-Certified Learning of Control Systems with Quadratic Nonlinearities: A Data-Driven Approach

Core Concepts
The author aims to develop a method for inferring stable quadratic control dynamical systems by investigating stability characteristics and applying them to the learning process. The main thesis is to ensure bounded-input bounded-state stability in inferred models through a data-driven approach.
This content discusses a methodology for learning stable quadratic control systems through data-driven approaches. It focuses on stability guarantees, energy-preserving nonlinearities, and parametrizations of matrices to ensure stability. The efficacy of the proposed framework is demonstrated through numerical examples. Significant developments have been made in learning dynamical systems from data, driven by various applications such as robotics and climate science. Operator inference methodologies are utilized for constructing low-dimensional dynamical models based on prior knowledge and expert insights. The content emphasizes the importance of stability in dynamical systems and addresses challenges related to ensuring stability while learning dynamical systems. By leveraging parametrizations for stable matrices and energy-preserving Hessians, the proposed methodology ensures stable behavior in learned models. Theoretical concepts such as Hurwitz matrices, Lyapunov functions, and energy-preserving nonlinearities are discussed in the context of stability certification for quadratic control systems. The methodology extends to more general quadratic Lyapunov functions for enhanced stability guarantees. Numerical examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to traditional methods. Stability-certified learning ensures robust performance and opens avenues for further research in data-driven modeling of complex systems.
A = (J − R)Q H ∈ Rn×n2 is an energy-preserving Hessian. r = ∥B∥2∥u∥L∞ / σmin(R) D = X X ˜⊗ X U
"Learning stability-certified control systems with quadratic nonlinearities." "Bounded-input bounded-state stability for quadratic systems with control is shown under parametrization assumptions."

Deeper Inquiries

How can derivative information be accurately estimated in noisy and sparse datasets

In noisy and sparse datasets, accurately estimating derivative information can be challenging but crucial for learning dynamical systems. One approach to address this challenge is by incorporating regularization techniques into the estimation process. Regularization helps in reducing the impact of noise in the data and prevents overfitting, thus improving the accuracy of derivative estimation. Techniques such as Tikhonov regularization or Lasso regularization can be employed to stabilize the estimation process and enhance the robustness of derivative calculations. Another strategy is to utilize smoothing algorithms or filtering methods to preprocess the data before estimating derivatives. Smoothing techniques like Gaussian smoothing or Savitzky-Golay filtering can help reduce noise while preserving important features in the dataset, making it easier to estimate derivatives accurately. Furthermore, leveraging interpolation methods such as spline interpolation or kernel regression can also aid in estimating derivatives from noisy and sparse datasets. These methods help fill in missing data points and provide a more continuous representation of the underlying dynamics, facilitating more accurate derivative calculations.

What are the implications of incorporating integrating schemes or neural ODEs into the methodology

Incorporating integrating schemes or neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) into the methodology offers several advantages for learning dynamical systems: Improved Robustness: Integrating schemes allow for numerical integration of differential equations without explicitly requiring derivative information. This enhances robustness when dealing with noisy or incomplete datasets by enabling smoother extrapolation of system dynamics. Data Efficiency: Neural ODEs offer a data-driven approach that learns continuous dynamics directly from observed trajectories without needing explicit derivatives at every time step. This leads to more efficient use of available data and better generalization capabilities. Flexibility: Neural ODEs provide a flexible framework for modeling complex nonlinear dynamics by treating them as black-box functions that are learned during training. This flexibility allows for capturing intricate relationships within high-dimensional systems effectively. Interpretability: By representing dynamical systems as neural networks evolving over time, insights into system behavior can be gained through analyzing network architectures and parameters' evolution.

How can the proposed approach be extended to address more complex dynamical systems beyond quadratic models

To extend the proposed approach beyond quadratic models to address more complex dynamical systems, several strategies can be implemented: Higher-Order Nonlinearities: Incorporate higher-order terms beyond quadratic nonlinearity in model inference methodologies using operator inference frameworks tailored towards polynomial representations. 2 .Deep Learning Architectures: Utilize deep learning architectures such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks capable of capturing temporal dependencies within dynamic systems efficiently. 3 .Hybrid Approaches: Combine physics-informed constraints with machine learning techniques like reinforcement learning to learn control policies for highly nonlinear dynamical systems. 4 .Model Ensembles: Employ ensemble modeling techniques where multiple models are trained on different subsets of data or variations in hyperparameters to capture diverse aspects of complex system behaviors effectively. 5 .Adaptive Sampling Strategies: Implement adaptive sampling strategies that focus on collecting informative data points based on uncertainty estimates from current models, ensuring efficient exploration across various regions within high-dimensional state spaces.