toplogo
Sign In

Neural Network-Based Event-Triggering Mechanisms for Consensus Problems


Core Concepts
Incorporating neural networks in event-triggered mechanisms optimizes communication in consensus problems while preserving stability.
Abstract
The article discusses incorporating neural networks in event-triggered mechanisms (ETMs) for consensus problems. It proposes NN-ETM as a solution to optimize communication while ensuring stability. The structure, architecture, and training process of NN-ETM are detailed. Simulation results show the trade-off between error and communication rate based on the cost function parameter λ. Introduction ETMs reduce communication load in networked control applications. Design complexity increases for decentralized multi-agent setups. Data Extraction "This typically results in ad-hoc solutions, which may only work for the consensus protocols under consideration." "Advantageously combining these pieces of information is not trivial." Quotations "Unlike hand-crafted approaches, data-driven methods such as Neural Networks (NNs) have been used to work around standard feature engineering." "Moreover, we aim to incorporate them safely, providing guarantees of boundedness for the consensus error." Design Criteria for ETM in Consensus Input-to-State Stability criteria are derived. Interconnection of ISS consensus and ETM is analyzed. ISS Consensus Linear and nonlinear consensus protocols are discussed. Stability analysis under different ETMs is highlighted. Experiments Training process using Pytorch's autograd is explained. Fuzzy Event-Triggering Mechanism is introduced. Simulation Results Results show the effectiveness of trained NN-ETM on a network of 5 agents. Trade-off between error and communication rate is demonstrated.
Stats
"This typically results in ad-hoc solutions, which may only work for the consensus protocols under consideration." "Advantageously combining these pieces of information is not trivial."
Quotes
"Unlike hand-crafted approaches, data-driven methods such as Neural Networks (NNs) have been used to work around standard feature engineering." "Moreover, we aim to incorporate them safely, providing guarantees of boundedness for the consensus error."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Irene Perez-... at arxiv.org 03-20-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.12567.pdf
NN-ETM

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed NN-ETM be adapted for more complex consensus algorithms?

The proposed NN-ETM can be adapted for more complex consensus algorithms by adjusting the inputs to the neural network and potentially modifying the architecture of the network itself. For more intricate consensus protocols, additional information may need to be considered as input to the neural network. This could include factors such as higher-order dynamics, nonlinear interactions between agents, or specific constraints unique to a particular algorithm. The neural network's architecture may also need to be modified to handle these complexities efficiently. Techniques like recurrent neural networks or attention mechanisms could be explored to capture temporal dependencies or focus on relevant information in a dynamic manner.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using a neural network-based approach in event-triggered mechanisms?

While neural networks offer flexibility and automation in designing event-triggered mechanisms (ETMs), there are several limitations and drawbacks associated with their use: Complexity: Neural networks introduce complexity into ETMs, making it challenging to interpret how decisions are made. Training Data Dependence: Neural networks require large amounts of training data, which might not always be readily available for all scenarios. Overfitting: There is a risk of overfitting when training neural networks, leading them to perform well on training data but poorly on unseen data. Computational Resources: Training and running neural networks can require significant computational resources, especially for larger models. Generalization Issues: Neural networks may struggle with generalizing beyond the specific scenarios they were trained on.

How might hierarchical approaches impact the design and performance of event-triggered consensus systems?

Hierarchical approaches can have several impacts on the design and performance of event-triggered consensus systems: Modular Design: Hierarchical approaches allow breaking down complex systems into manageable modules that interact hierarchically. In an event-triggered system, this modular design can facilitate independent analysis and optimization at different levels. Scalability: Hierarchical structures enable scalability by organizing components into layers where each layer focuses on specific tasks or levels of abstraction within an event-triggered system. Interoperability: Hierarchical designs promote interoperability between different components within an event-triggered system by defining clear interfaces and communication protocols between layers. 4Performance Optimization: By optimizing each hierarchical level independently while ensuring compatibility across levels, performance bottlenecks can be identified and addressed effectively in event-triggered consensus systems. These hierarchical structures provide a systematic way to manage complexity while enhancing adaptability and efficiency in designing robust event-triggering mechanisms for consensus problems at various scales within multi-agent systems."
0