toplogo
Sign In

A Multi-constraint and Multi-objective Allocation Model for Emergency Rescue in IoT Environment


Core Concepts
Developed MSGW-FLM model enhances emergency resource allocation in IoT environments.
Abstract
The article introduces the Multi-Objective Shuffled Gray-Wolf Frog Leaping Model (MSGW-FLM) for effective resource allocation in emergency rescue scenarios. Leveraging IoT and spatio-temporal data analytics, the model outperforms established models like NSGA-II, IBEA, and MOEA/D. It addresses complex multi-cycle emergency rescue scenarios with numerous constraints and objectives. The study emphasizes the importance of data-driven decision-making in optimizing resource distribution during emergencies. By combining Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (GWOA) and Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm (SFLA), MSGW-FLM offers a novel approach to dynamic multi-cycle emergency response planning.
Stats
The MSGW-FLM model has been tested against 28 diverse challenges. Performance metrics used include HV (hyper volume), IGD (inverted generation distance), Spread, and convergence. MSGW-FLM consistently outperforms NSGA-II, IBEA, and MOEA/D in many evaluations.
Quotes
"Our main contributions are outlined as follows: In the context of multi-cycle emergency rescue within IoT framework, we introduce the MSGW-FLM: a multi-constraint multi-objective emergency resource allocation model derived from a combination of the grey wolf optimization and frog leaping algorithms." "Using spatio-temporal data, the model is tested on 28 multi-objective tasks." "MSGW-FLM consistently outperforms baseline models such as NSGA-II, IBEA and MOEA/D in many scenarios."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the MSGW-FLM model be adapted for real-world emergency scenarios?

The MSGW-FLM model can be adapted for real-world emergency scenarios by integrating it with existing emergency response systems. This integration would involve incorporating real-time data from IoT devices, such as sensors and cameras, to provide accurate information on disaster areas and resource needs. The model's multi-constraint, multi-objective approach can help in optimizing resource allocation by considering various factors like distance, urgency, and availability of resources. Additionally, the rolling time-domain planning approach used in the model allows for dynamic adjustments based on new data, making it suitable for evolving emergency situations.

What are potential limitations or drawbacks of relying heavily on IoT devices for dynamic decision-making in emergencies?

While IoT devices offer valuable data insights during emergencies, there are potential limitations and drawbacks to relying heavily on them for dynamic decision-making. One limitation is the dependency on network connectivity; disruptions or failures in communication networks could hinder the transmission of critical data needed for decision-making. Privacy and security concerns also arise when using IoT devices to collect sensitive information during emergencies. Moreover, the sheer volume of data generated by these devices may overwhelm decision-makers if not properly managed or analyzed efficiently.

How can the concept of dynamic multi-cycle assessments be applied to other fields beyond emergency management?

The concept of dynamic multi-cycle assessments utilized in emergency management can be applied to various other fields to improve decision-making processes over time. For example: Supply Chain Management: By implementing a continuous assessment cycle that adapts based on changing market conditions and demand fluctuations. Healthcare: Utilizing ongoing evaluations across multiple treatment cycles to optimize patient care plans and medical interventions. Financial Planning: Employing iterative assessments over different investment cycles to adjust portfolios according to market trends. Environmental Conservation: Implementing recurring evaluations across seasons or years to monitor ecosystem changes and conservation efforts effectively. In each field, adopting a dynamic multi-cycle assessment approach allows stakeholders to make informed decisions based on evolving circumstances while continuously improving outcomes through iterative refinements.
0