Efficient Computation and Communication Strategies for Vertical Federated Learning

Core Concepts

This paper introduces the concept of Lightweight Vertical Federated Learning (LVFL), which targets both computational and communication efficiencies in the vertical federated learning setting. LVFL employs separate lightweighting strategies for the feature model and feature embedding to improve efficiency.

Abstract

The paper introduces the concept of Lightweight Vertical Federated Learning (LVFL), which aims to enhance both computational and communication efficiency in the vertical federated learning (VFL) setting.
Key highlights:

VFL involves clients with different feature spaces but a common sample space, which introduces unique challenges compared to horizontal federated learning (HFL).
LVFL employs separate lightweighting strategies for the feature model (to improve computational efficiency) and the feature embedding (to enhance communication efficiency).
The paper establishes a convergence bound for the LVFL algorithm that accounts for both communication and computational lightweighting ratios.
Experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset demonstrate that LVFL can significantly reduce computational and communication demands while preserving robust learning performance.
The paper first provides an overview of the VFL system model and formulates the learning objective. It then introduces the LVFL algorithm, which dynamically adjusts the computational and communication lightweighting ratios for each client. The convergence analysis of LVFL is presented, deriving bounds that relate the lightweighting errors and ratios. Finally, the experimental results validate the effectiveness of LVFL in balancing efficiency and performance.

Stats

None

Quotes

None

Key Insights Distilled From

Computation and Communication Efficient Lightweighting Vertical Federated Learning

by Heqiang Wang... at arxiv.org 04-02-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.00466.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the LVFL framework be extended to handle more complex and heterogeneous client environments, such as those with varying computational and communication capabilities

To extend the LVFL framework to handle more complex and heterogeneous client environments with varying computational and communication capabilities, several strategies can be implemented:

Dynamic Lightweighting Ratios: Implementing dynamic lightweighting ratios that adapt to the specific computational and communication capabilities of each client. This dynamic adjustment can ensure that the lightweighting process is optimized for each client's unique requirements.

Adaptive Pruning Techniques: Developing adaptive pruning techniques that can adjust the level of model and embedding pruning based on the individual capabilities of each client. This adaptive approach can help balance the trade-off between model complexity and communication efficiency.

Federated Learning Orchestration: Introducing a federated learning orchestration mechanism that can monitor and manage the computational and communication resources of each client in real-time. This orchestration can dynamically allocate resources and adjust lightweighting strategies as needed.

Collaborative Learning Strategies: Implementing collaborative learning strategies where clients with higher computational capabilities can assist those with limited resources. This collaborative approach can help distribute the computational load more efficiently across the network.

By incorporating these strategies, the LVFL framework can be extended to effectively handle the complexities of heterogeneous client environments and optimize the computational and communication efficiency of the federated learning process.

What other techniques, beyond model and embedding pruning, could be explored to further enhance the efficiency of vertical federated learning

Beyond model and embedding pruning, several techniques can be explored to further enhance the efficiency of vertical federated learning:

Knowledge Distillation: Implementing knowledge distillation techniques to transfer knowledge from a complex global model to simpler local models. This can reduce the computational burden on clients while maintaining learning performance.

Quantization and Compression: Applying quantization and compression methods to reduce the precision of model parameters and feature embeddings, respectively. This can significantly decrease the communication overhead without compromising the learning quality.

Differential Privacy: Integrating differential privacy mechanisms to protect the privacy of sensitive data during the federated learning process. By adding noise to the gradients or model updates, differential privacy can enhance data security in vertical federated learning scenarios.

Transfer Learning: Leveraging transfer learning approaches to transfer knowledge from related tasks or domains to improve the learning efficiency in vertical federated learning. This can help accelerate the convergence of models and reduce the computational requirements for training.

By exploring these additional techniques in conjunction with model and embedding pruning, the efficiency and effectiveness of vertical federated learning can be further enhanced.

What are the potential privacy implications of the LVFL approach, and how can they be addressed to ensure the security of sensitive data in vertical federated learning scenarios

The LVFL approach, like any federated learning framework, poses potential privacy implications that need to be addressed to ensure the security of sensitive data in vertical federated learning scenarios. Some strategies to mitigate these privacy risks include:

Secure Aggregation: Implementing secure aggregation techniques to ensure that model updates from different clients are aggregated in a privacy-preserving manner. This can prevent any individual client from accessing the raw data or model updates of others.

Homomorphic Encryption: Utilizing homomorphic encryption to perform computations on encrypted data without decrypting it. This can protect the privacy of data during the federated learning process and prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information.

Differential Privacy: Incorporating differential privacy mechanisms to add noise to the model updates or gradients before sharing them with the server. This can help protect the privacy of individual data samples and prevent the extraction of sensitive information from the model updates.

Data Anonymization: Anonymizing the data before sharing it with other clients or the central server to remove any personally identifiable information. This can help protect the privacy of individuals while still enabling collaborative learning in a federated environment.

By implementing these privacy-enhancing techniques and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations, the LVFL approach can maintain the security and privacy of sensitive data in vertical federated learning scenarios.