Efficient Comparison of Gaussian Mixture Models via Gromov-Wasserstein-like Distances

Core Concepts

The paper introduces two Gromov-Wasserstein-type distances, MGW2 and EW2, to efficiently compare Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) across different dimensions and invariant to isometries.

Abstract

The paper introduces two Gromov-Wasserstein-type distances to compare Gaussian mixture models (GMMs):

Mixture Gromov-Wasserstein (MGW2):

MGW2 is a natural "Gromovization" of the Mixture-Wasserstein (MW2) distance, which compares GMMs by restricting the set of admissible transportation couplings to be GMMs themselves.
MGW2 defines a pseudometric on the set of all finite GMMs that is invariant to isometries, but does not directly provide an optimal transportation plan between the points.

Embedded Wasserstein (EW2):

EW2 is shown to be equivalent to the invariant OT distance introduced by Alvarez-Melis et al. (2019), which explicitly encodes the isometric transformation applied to one of the measures.
EW2 can be used as an alternative to Gromov-Wasserstein and allows to derive an optimal assignment between points, but is computationally more expensive than MGW2.

The paper also discusses the practical use of MGW2 on discrete data distributions and the difficulty of designing a transportation plan associated with the MGW2 problem. Finally, the authors illustrate the use of their distances on medium-to-large scale problems such as shape matching and hyperspectral image color transfer.

Stats

None.

Quotes

None.

Key Insights Distilled From

Gromov-Wassertein-like Distances in the Gaussian Mixture Models Space

by Anto... at arxiv.org 04-01-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.11256.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the transportation plan associated with the MGW2 problem be efficiently designed without resorting to a combinatorial approach

To efficiently design the transportation plan associated with the MGW2 problem without resorting to a combinatorial approach, one approach is to leverage the properties of the problem and optimize the process. One efficient method is to use optimization algorithms that can handle high-dimensional spaces and complex constraints. By formulating the problem as an optimization task, algorithms like gradient descent, simulated annealing, or genetic algorithms can be employed to iteratively improve the transportation plan. These algorithms can search for the optimal transformation that minimizes the MGW2 distance between the Gaussian mixture models. Additionally, techniques like convex optimization or semidefinite programming can be utilized to efficiently solve the problem and find the optimal transportation plan. By leveraging these advanced optimization methods, the transportation plan associated with the MGW2 problem can be efficiently designed without the need for a combinatorial approach.

What are the theoretical and practical differences between the EW2 distance and the Gromov-Wasserstein distance in terms of their properties and applications

Theoretical differences between the EW2 distance and the Gromov-Wasserstein distance lie in their formulations and underlying principles. EW2 focuses on finding an isometric transformation between two measures, explicitly considering the isometric properties, while Gromov-Wasserstein distance aims to compare metric measure spaces without explicitly considering the transformation. In practical terms, EW2 explicitly accounts for isometries, making it suitable for applications where preserving distances under transformations is crucial. On the other hand, Gromov-Wasserstein distance provides a more general framework for comparing metric measure spaces, allowing for flexibility in applications that do not require explicit isometric considerations. In applications, EW2 can be beneficial for tasks where preserving distances under transformations is essential, such as shape matching or image registration, while Gromov-Wasserstein distance can be more versatile for a broader range of applications in optimal transport and metric space comparisons.

How can the proposed Gromov-Wasserstein-like distances be leveraged to improve the performance of machine learning tasks that involve comparing Gaussian mixture models, such as generative modeling or domain adaptation

The proposed Gromov-Wasserstein-like distances can significantly enhance the performance of machine learning tasks involving Gaussian mixture models. By providing alternative ways to compare distributions, such as the MGW2 and EW2 distances, these distances offer more flexibility and robustness in handling complex data structures. In generative modeling, the ability to compare Gaussian mixture models efficiently can improve the quality and diversity of generated samples. For domain adaptation, the invariant properties of these distances can help align distributions across different domains more effectively. Additionally, in tasks like shape matching and hyperspectral image color transfer, the ability to compare Gaussian mixture models invariant to isometries can lead to more accurate and reliable results. Overall, leveraging these Gromov-Wasserstein-like distances can enhance the performance and applicability of machine learning tasks involving Gaussian mixture models.