toplogo
Resources
Sign In

Optimized Data Placement for Accelerating GEMV Computations in Generative AI with Processing-In-Memory


Core Concepts
Optimized data placement is critical to harnessing the full potential of PIM acceleration for GEMV computations that dominate Generative AI inference. The proposed PIMnast methodology balances multiple factors to identify data placements that deliver up to 6.86x speedup for GEMVs, leading to up to 5x end-to-end speedup for Generative AI per-token latencies.
Abstract
The content discusses the importance of efficient data placement for accelerating general matrix-vector multiplication (GEMV) computations, which dominate Generative AI (GenAI) inference, using processing-in-memory (PIM) technology. Key highlights: GEMV computations demand high memory bandwidth, making them a critical target for PIM acceleration. However, a key challenge in harnessing PIM acceleration is deducing the optimal data placement to map the matrix in memory banks. The authors identify multiple factors that impact data placement, including PIM architecture, memory configuration, GenAI needs, and GEMV characteristics. They propose the PIMnast methodology, which balances these factors to identify data placements that maximize GEMV-PIM acceleration. PIMnast, coupled with additional orchestration knobs, delivers up to 6.86x speedup for GEMVs (of the available 7x roofline speedup), leading to up to 5x speedup for per-token latencies in GenAI models. The authors also discuss software and system considerations to realize the PIMnast data placement, as well as potential hardware and software optimizations to address deficiencies for certain GenAI models.
Stats
The content does not contain any explicit numerical data or metrics. The key figures and results are presented in the form of speedup numbers compared to baseline SoC performance.
Quotes
The content does not contain any direct quotes.

Deeper Inquiries

How can the PIMnast methodology be extended to handle other memory-intensive workloads beyond GEMV in Generative AI

The PIMnast methodology can be extended to handle other memory-intensive workloads beyond GEMV in Generative AI by adapting the data-placement and orchestration techniques to suit the specific requirements of the new workloads. For example, for tasks that involve large matrix operations or frequent memory accesses, similar strategies can be applied to optimize data-placement in memory banks and orchestrate computations efficiently. By analyzing the factors that impact data-placement and performance, such as memory bandwidth demands, data formats, and computation needs, the PIMnast methodology can be tailored to address the unique characteristics of different memory-intensive workloads in Generative AI.

What are the potential challenges and trade-offs in implementing the large page sizes proposed for realizing the PIMnast data placement

Implementing large page sizes for realizing the PIMnast data placement may pose challenges in terms of memory fragmentation and system overhead. Large pages can lead to increased memory fragmentation, making it challenging to allocate contiguous memory blocks for certain applications. This can impact memory efficiency and system performance. Additionally, managing large pages requires additional system resources and may introduce complexities in memory management. Trade-offs may include increased memory utilization, potential performance overheads in memory allocation and deallocation, and the need for efficient memory mapping strategies to ensure optimal utilization of large pages.

Could the PIMnast data placement and orchestration techniques be applied to other emerging memory technologies like Compute Express Link (CXL) to accelerate Generative AI workloads

The PIMnast data placement and orchestration techniques can potentially be applied to other emerging memory technologies like Compute Express Link (CXL) to accelerate Generative AI workloads. By adapting the methodology to the specific characteristics of CXL-based memory systems, such as different memory access patterns and communication protocols, it is possible to optimize data placement and computation orchestration for improved performance. Challenges may include compatibility with CXL specifications, efficient utilization of CXL bandwidth, and ensuring seamless integration with existing AI frameworks and applications. By addressing these challenges and leveraging the principles of PIMnast, it is feasible to enhance the acceleration of Generative AI workloads on CXL-based memory architectures.
0