toplogo
Sign In

Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Post-Stroke Recanalization: Impact on Outcomes


Core Concepts
Intensive blood pressure lowering after stroke recanalization may lead to poor outcomes, contrary to prior beliefs.
Abstract

The OPTIMAL-BP trial presented at the 9th European Stroke Organisation Conference (ESOC) highlighted the impact of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) management in the 24 hours post-recanalization with intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) on patient outcomes. Here is a breakdown of the key insights from the study:

  • Study Design and Participants:

    • Over 300 patients post-IAT for acute ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to intensive or conventional blood pressure management.
    • Intensive group had a 44% lower chance of favorable outcomes at 3 months.
  • Results and Recommendations:

    • Intensive blood pressure lowering post-recanalization increased the risk of disability without reducing intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or death.
    • Optimal blood pressure range post-IAT remains uncertain.
  • Comparison with Conventional Group:

    • High SBP associated with poor outcomes.
    • Intensive group showed worse outcomes despite similar adverse event rates.
  • Safety Concerns and Secondary Outcomes:

    • Intensive group had higher rates of malignant brain edema.
    • No significant differences in key secondary outcomes between groups.
  • Study Limitations and Generalizability:

    • Early termination may have impacted statistical power.
    • Conducted in South Korea, results may not be universally applicable.
edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
Patients in the intensive group spent 80.3% of the first 24 hours with SBP <140 mm Hg vs 54.2% in the conventional group. Patients in the intensive group were significantly less likely to have a favorable outcome at 3 months, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.56. Patients in the intensive group were substantially more likely to experience malignant brain edema, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.88.
Quotes
"Intensive blood pressure lowering harms the brain, especially just after reperfusion." - Carlos Molina, MD

Key Insights Distilled From

by Liam Davenpo... at www.medscape.com 05-31-2023

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/992589
Intensive BP Reduction After Stroke Recanalization Harmful

Deeper Inquiries

How can the findings of this study impact current guidelines on blood pressure management post-stroke?

The findings of this study suggest that intensive blood pressure management in the 24 hours after successful recanalization with intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) can substantially increase the risk of a poor outcome at 3 months. This contradicts the current guidelines that recommend relatively high upper systolic blood pressure (SBP) limits post-stroke. Therefore, these results may prompt a reevaluation of the guidelines to potentially adjust the recommended blood pressure management strategies post-stroke, especially after recanalization procedures.

Is there a potential benefit to individualized blood pressure management strategies based on patient characteristics post-recanalization?

Individualized blood pressure management strategies based on patient characteristics post-recanalization could potentially offer benefits. The study results indicate that intensive blood pressure lowering in the early post-IAT period may lead to increased disability without reducing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage or death. Therefore, tailoring blood pressure management to individual patient characteristics such as age, stroke severity, comorbidities, and response to treatment could optimize outcomes and minimize potential harm. This personalized approach may help in achieving better clinical outcomes post-recanalization.

How might cultural or regional differences influence the outcomes observed in studies like this?

Cultural or regional differences can influence the outcomes observed in studies like this due to variations in healthcare practices, patient demographics, and access to resources. For example, in this study conducted in South Korea, the results may not be directly generalizable to other populations with different healthcare systems, genetic predispositions, or lifestyle factors. Cultural beliefs and practices related to stroke management, including blood pressure control, may also impact the outcomes observed. Therefore, when interpreting study results and implementing guidelines, it is essential to consider cultural and regional differences to ensure the relevance and applicability of the findings in diverse populations.
0
star