Core Concepts
Design fiction can be configured as breaching experiments to surface the taken-for-granted background expectancies that impact the acceptability and adoption of future technologies in everyday life.
Abstract
The paper presents an interdisciplinary approach that leverages design fiction as breaching experiment to understand the acceptability and adoption challenges confronting future and emerging technologies.
The authors first outline the problem of the future in HCI, noting that the field is dominated by a vision of the proximate future and pragmatic projections of technological innovations that often fail to account for the mundane complexity of everyday life. Usability evaluation has been the primary focus, but this can be harmful as it locks HCI into considerations of utility rather than the broader question of acceptability and adoption.
The authors then explicate their theoretical perspective, drawing on design fiction and breaching experiments. Design fiction is presented as a way to prototype proximate futures by embedding speculations about future technologies in recognizable social scenes and mundane experiences. This helps surface the background expectancies that shape the acceptability and adoption of future technologies. Breaching experiments, originating in ethnomethodology, are a method for making these normally tacit and taken-for-granted background expectancies visible by deliberately disrupting or "breaching" them.
The authors hypothesize that by configuring design fiction as breaching experiments, it is possible to provoke the common sense reasoning and background expectancies that underpin the acceptability and adoption of future technologies in everyday life. They then present a concrete case study, "Experiencing the Future Mundane", which demonstrates this approach in practice. The case involves a mobile platform that embeds a proximate technological future in the mundane social scene of watching TV, using a range of smart technologies to create an immersive and adaptive media experience. This hybrid assemblage is designed to call into question the taken-for-granted ways in which everyday life is expected to work, in order to surface the background expectancies that shape the acceptability and adoption of the envisioned future technologies.
The paper makes a methodological contribution to HCI, proposing a novel approach that combines design fiction and breaching experiments to better understand the acceptability and adoption challenges facing future technologies before they are fully developed and deployed.
Stats
"All designers have to grapple with the unknowability of the future. Objects that are designed here and now will come into use at some future under conditions their creator can neither know nor control … even the most mundane of acts can unravel if expected outcomes are not met."
"usability evaluation … can be ineffective and even harmful … it can mute creative ideas … quash what could have been an inspired vision … and incorrectly suggest a design's scientific worthiness rather than offer a meaningful critique of how it would be adopted and used in everyday practice."
"The member of society uses background expectancies as a scheme of interpretation. With their use actual appearances are for him [or her] recognisable and intelligible as the appearances-of-familiar events. Demonstrably he is responsive to this background, while at the same time he has little or nothing to say."
Quotes
"All designers have to grapple with the unknowability of the future. Objects that are designed here and now will come into use at some future under conditions their creator can neither know nor control … even the most mundane of acts can unravel if expected outcomes are not met."
"usability evaluation … can be ineffective and even harmful … it can mute creative ideas … quash what could have been an inspired vision … and incorrectly suggest a design's scientific worthiness rather than offer a meaningful critique of how it would be adopted and used in everyday practice."
"The member of society uses background expectancies as a scheme of interpretation. With their use actual appearances are for him [or her] recognisable and intelligible as the appearances-of-familiar events. Demonstrably he is responsive to this background, while at the same time he has little or nothing to say."