toplogo
Sign In

Fast and Accurate Dual-Robot Relative Motion Tracking for Industrial Applications


Core Concepts
A systematic three-step approach to designing and programming a dual-robot system to optimize relative motion tracking performance, including optimizing the robot configuration, planning motion primitives, and iteratively adjusting waypoints to achieve high speed and uniform motion while meeting accuracy constraints.
Abstract

The paper presents a comprehensive method to generate robot motion programs for two industrial robots to track complex spatial curves with the objective of achieving high and uniform path speed while maintaining specified tracking accuracy.

The approach is decomposed into three main steps:

  1. System Configuration Optimization:

    • The relative placement between the two robots is optimized based on the specified relative motion path using resolved motion control to track the desired trajectory while considering robot joint velocity and acceleration constraints.
    • Differential evolution is used to find the best system configuration to maximize the constant relative path traversal speed.
  2. Waypoint Optimization:

    • The optimal solution from step 1 is approximated using robot motion primitives (linear, circular, and joint-space linear paths) to fit the target curve within a specified tolerance while using the smallest number of waypoints.
    • The path speed is lowered until the path constraints and speed uniformity constraint are satisfied.
  3. Waypoint Iteration:

    • The waypoints are adjusted iteratively to improve the path constraints, first in simulation and then on the physical robots.
    • Proportional adjustment and multi-peak gradient descent are used to update the waypoints around regions with large tracking errors.

The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on two separate testbeds, consisting of ABB and FANUC robots, for two challenging test curves. The performance improvement over the current industrial practice baseline is over 300%, and over 14% compared to the optimized single-arm case.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
The maximum path speed for the baseline, single-arm optimized, and dual-arm optimized cases are: Curve 1: Baseline (sim): 124.01 mm/s Baseline (real): 103.11 mm/s Single Opt (sim): 399.81 mm/s Single Opt (real): 395.72 mm/s Dual Opt (sim): 550.73 mm/s Dual Opt (real): 451.52 mm/s Curve 2: Baseline (sim): 406.10 mm/s Baseline (real): 299.97 mm/s Single Opt (sim): 1207.45 mm/s Single Opt (real): 1197.43 mm/s Dual Opt (sim): 1705.26 mm/s Dual Opt (real): 1404.87 mm/s
Quotes
"The performance improvement over the current industrial practice baseline is over 300%, and over 14% compared to the optimized single-arm case."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed approach be extended to handle more complex task requirements, such as multiple end-effector tools or dynamic obstacles in the environment

The proposed approach can be extended to handle more complex task requirements by incorporating advanced planning and control strategies. For tasks involving multiple end-effector tools, the system can be modified to account for the different kinematics and dynamics of each tool. This would involve creating separate motion plans for each tool and coordinating their movements to achieve the desired task objectives. Additionally, the system can be enhanced to switch between end-effectors dynamically during the task execution, allowing for increased flexibility and efficiency in handling diverse tasks. To address dynamic obstacles in the environment, the approach can be augmented with real-time perception and planning capabilities. By integrating sensors such as cameras or LiDAR, the system can detect obstacles and adjust the robot's trajectory accordingly to avoid collisions. Advanced motion planning algorithms, such as rapidly-exploring random trees (RRT) or probabilistic roadmaps (PRM), can be utilized to generate collision-free paths in dynamic environments. By continuously updating the motion plan based on the changing environment, the system can adapt to unforeseen obstacles and ensure safe and efficient task execution.

What are the potential challenges and limitations in applying this method to industrial settings with different robot vendors or control architectures

Applying this method to industrial settings with different robot vendors or control architectures may pose several challenges and limitations. One major challenge is the variability in robot kinematics, dynamics, and control interfaces across different vendors. Each robot manufacturer may have unique programming languages, motion primitives, and control algorithms, making it challenging to develop a universal solution that is compatible with all systems. Integration with diverse control architectures may require extensive customization and adaptation of the proposed approach to ensure seamless communication and coordination between multiple robots. Another limitation is the lack of standardized performance metrics and specifications across different robot platforms. Industrial robots from different vendors may have varying accuracy, speed, and payload capacities, which can impact the effectiveness of the optimization approach. Additionally, the availability of sensor feedback and real-time control capabilities may differ between systems, affecting the system's ability to adapt to dynamic environments and obstacles. To address these challenges, thorough system integration testing and validation are essential to ensure compatibility and performance across different robot platforms. Developing modular and flexible software interfaces that can be easily adapted to different control architectures can facilitate the deployment of the approach in diverse industrial settings.

Could the waypoint adjustment strategy be further improved by incorporating machine learning techniques to better predict the robot's behavior and optimize the motion plan

The waypoint adjustment strategy could be further improved by incorporating machine learning techniques to enhance the prediction of the robot's behavior and optimize the motion plan. Machine learning algorithms, such as reinforcement learning or neural networks, can be trained on historical robot motion data to learn complex patterns and relationships between waypoint adjustments and tracking errors. By leveraging machine learning, the system can predict the optimal adjustments for waypoints based on the current state of the robot and the environment, leading to more efficient and accurate motion planning. Furthermore, machine learning models can be used to dynamically adjust the step size and direction of the waypoint updates based on the error gradients and performance feedback. This adaptive learning approach can enable the system to continuously improve its waypoint adjustment strategy over time, leading to enhanced tracking accuracy and efficiency in real-world industrial applications. By combining the proposed waypoint iteration method with machine learning algorithms, the system can achieve higher levels of automation and optimization in robot motion planning and control.
0
star