Core Concepts
LLMs can generate misinformation that is harder to detect than human-written misinformation, posing challenges for online safety and trust.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have the potential to generate deceptive misinformation that can be difficult for both humans and detectors to detect. The research explores the detection difficulty of LLM-generated misinformation compared to human-written misinformation with the same semantics. It categorizes LLM-generated misinformation types, domains, sources, intents, and errors. Through empirical investigation, it finds that LLM-generated misinformation can be more deceptive and potentially harmful. The study also discusses implications for combating misinformation in the age of LLMs and proposes countermeasures throughout the lifecycle of LLMs.
Stats
LLM-generated misinformation can be harder to detect for humans and detectors compared to human-written misinformation.
ChatGPT almost cannot defend against hallucinated news generation methods.
GPT-4 outperforms humans in detecting LLM-generated misinformation.
Quotes
"LLM-generated misinformation can be harder for humans to detect than human-written information."
"Malicious users could exploit LLMs to escape detection by detectors."
"Existing detectors are likely less effective in detecting LLM-generated misinformation."