Ethical Considerations in Sharing Sensitive Information: A Dynamic Logic Approach

Core Concepts

This work introduces a dynamic logic framework for knowledge pooling that emphasizes the distinction between sharing known information versus aggregating uncertain information. It proposes a model for permissible knowledge pooling that considers both the epistemic and ethical implications of information sharing.

Abstract

The paper presents a formal framework for knowledge pooling that goes beyond the traditional approach of aggregating all available information. It introduces a dynamic logic that focuses on the sharing of known information rather than the accumulation of uncertain data.
The key highlights are:

The paper introduces a dynamic logic for knowledge pooling that updates the model based on the sender's known information, rather than arbitrary information aggregation.
It defines the concept of "permission to know" as a static norm, capturing the ethical considerations around accessing sensitive information.
The paper then introduces the notion of "permission to share knowledge" as a dynamic norm, exploring the interplay between epistemic and ethical implications in multi-agent communication.
The framework highlights how knowledge pooling can lead to a distinct form of collective knowledge, bridging the gap between individual and distributed knowledge.
The paper discusses the relationship between knowledge pooling, information resolution, and the achievement of social consensus, providing insights into the complex dynamics of social dependence.

The proposed approach offers a comprehensive perspective on the ethical and epistemic considerations in information sharing, going beyond the traditional focus on either the mechanics of information transfer or the ethical implications alone.

Stats

Kaϕ Ñ ra Ż bsKbϕ
ra Ż bsrb Ż csKcϕ Ñ ra Ż csKcϕ
ra Ż bsKbϕ Ñ ra Ż bsrb Ż csKcϕ

Quotes

"Information pooling has been extensively formalised across various logical frameworks in distributed systems [1,23,11], characterized by diverse information-sharing patterns. These approaches generally adopt an intersection perspective, aggregating all possible information, regardless of whether it is known or unknown to the agents."
"In contrast, this work adopts a unique stance, emphasising that sharing knowledge means distributing what is known, rather than what remains uncertain."

Key Insights Distilled From

Permissible Knowledge Pooling

by Huimin Dong at arxiv.org 04-05-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.03418.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed framework for permissible knowledge pooling be extended to capture the dynamics of social power and hierarchies?

The proposed framework for permissible knowledge pooling can be extended to capture the dynamics of social power and hierarchies by incorporating the concept of social dependence and normative entitlements into the model. By considering the permissions to know and share knowledge within a social context, the framework can analyze how information flows and interactions between agents are influenced by power dynamics.
One way to extend the framework is to introduce a mechanism for representing different levels of authority or influence among agents. This can be achieved by assigning weights or priorities to agents based on their position in a social hierarchy. Agents with higher authority may have more permissions to share knowledge or may be able to override the permissions of lower-ranking agents.
Additionally, the framework can incorporate the concept of social norms and obligations, where certain agents are obligated to share specific knowledge with others based on their roles or responsibilities within a social structure. By modeling these social dynamics, the framework can provide insights into how power relationships impact the flow of information and the formation of collective knowledge within a group.

What are the potential applications of the knowledge resolution concept beyond the context of information sharing, and how could it inform our understanding of social consensus formation?

The knowledge resolution concept, beyond the context of information sharing, has potential applications in various fields such as decision-making, conflict resolution, and group dynamics. By understanding how knowledge is resolved and integrated within a group, we can gain insights into how consensus is formed and maintained among individuals with different perspectives and beliefs.
One potential application is in the field of collaborative decision-making, where the concept of knowledge resolution can help in reaching agreements and making informed choices based on shared understanding. By resolving conflicting information and aligning individual knowledge towards a common goal, the concept of knowledge resolution can facilitate consensus building and effective decision-making processes.
Furthermore, in conflict resolution scenarios, the knowledge resolution concept can be used to identify areas of agreement and disagreement among parties involved in a dispute. By resolving conflicting knowledge and reaching a shared understanding, it becomes possible to find common ground and work towards resolving conflicts peacefully.
Overall, the knowledge resolution concept can inform our understanding of social consensus formation by highlighting the importance of aligning individual knowledge towards a collective goal, resolving conflicts, and building shared understanding among group members.

How might the integration of common knowledge into the framework of permissible knowledge pooling shed light on the relationship between knowledge sharing and the achievement of shared understanding among a group of agents?

Integrating common knowledge into the framework of permissible knowledge pooling can shed light on the relationship between knowledge sharing and the achievement of shared understanding among a group of agents by emphasizing the importance of shared beliefs and mutual awareness in the process of information exchange.
Common knowledge, which refers to information that is not only known by individuals but also known to be known by others, plays a crucial role in establishing a shared reality and fostering collaboration among agents. By incorporating common knowledge into the framework, the model can capture the level of mutual understanding and agreement within a group, leading to more effective communication and decision-making processes.
Furthermore, the integration of common knowledge can help in identifying areas of consensus and divergence among agents, highlighting the shared beliefs and assumptions that contribute to the formation of collective knowledge. By emphasizing the role of common knowledge in knowledge pooling, the framework can provide insights into how shared understanding is achieved through the alignment of individual perspectives and the establishment of a common ground among group members.
Overall, integrating common knowledge into the framework of permissible knowledge pooling can enhance our understanding of how knowledge sharing leads to the development of shared beliefs, mutual understanding, and consensus among a group of agents.