toplogo
Sign In

Knowledge Distillation in Federated Edge Learning: A Comprehensive Survey


Core Concepts
The author explores the application of Knowledge Distillation (KD) in addressing challenges faced by Federated Edge Learning (FEL), providing insights into the role of KD and its potential benefits for FEL.
Abstract
The content delves into the increasing demand for intelligent services and privacy protection, motivating the application of Federated Edge Learning (FEL). It discusses how Knowledge Distillation (KD) has been leveraged to tackle challenges related to resources, personalization, and network environments in FEL. The paper reviews existing works that integrate KD into FEL training processes successfully, highlighting the importance of knowledge transfer and collaborative training among heterogeneous ML models. By categorizing different approaches based on the role of KD in FEL, it provides guidance for future research directions and real deployment scenarios.
Stats
Limited by device hardware, diverse user behaviors, and network infrastructure. Challenges related to resources, personalization, network environments. Model compression via knowledge transfer from bulky models to compact models. Distributed model training via knowledge exchange between models. Efficient communication achieved through distillation-based semi-supervised FL framework.
Quotes
"Due to diverse user behaviors, limited device capabilities and non-ideal communication environments, FEL faces more severe challenges than conventional FL." "KD has great potential to apply to various learning processes in FEL as an important tool for knowledge transfer or model collaborative training." "Applying KD-based FEL is a multi-dimensional problem that requires ensembled techniques with performance trade-offs."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Zhiyuan Wu,S... at arxiv.org 03-06-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.05849.pdf
Knowledge Distillation in Federated Edge Learning

Deeper Inquiries

How can devices be managed when offline or dropping out in KD-based FEL systems?

In KD-based Federated Edge Learning (FEL) systems, managing devices that go offline or drop out is crucial to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of the training process. One approach to handling this issue is by implementing a robust device management system that can detect when a device goes offline or drops out. When such an event occurs, the system should redistribute the workload among other active devices to compensate for the missing device's contribution. Additionally, techniques like checkpointing and resuming can be used to save progress periodically so that if a device rejoins after being offline, it can pick up from where it left off without disrupting the overall training process.

What are the implications of using KD as model representation exchange protocols on model performance?

Using Knowledge Distillation (KD) as model representation exchange protocols in Federated Edge Learning (FEL) systems has both advantages and implications on model performance. On one hand, KD allows for efficient knowledge transfer between models, enabling faster convergence and improved generalization capabilities across heterogeneous devices. It also helps in compressing large models into smaller ones suitable for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. However, there are implications to consider as well. While KD facilitates communication efficiency by transferring distilled knowledge instead of full model parameters, there might be information loss during distillation which could impact overall accuracy. Moreover, relying solely on KD for model representation exchange may lead to divergence among on-device models if not carefully managed. This divergence could result in suboptimal performance compared to traditional federated learning methods like FedAvg.

How can privacy protection be enhanced in KD-based FEL systems against inversion attacks?

Privacy protection is a critical concern in Federated Edge Learning (FEL), especially when employing Knowledge Distillation (KD) techniques which involve exchanging sensitive information between models. To enhance privacy protection against inversion attacks in KD-based FEL systems: Feature Transformation: Instead of directly sharing raw data or features during distillation, employ secure feature transformation techniques like encryption or differential privacy to obfuscate sensitive information before transmission. Secure Aggregation: Implement secure aggregation protocols that ensure aggregated updates do not leak individual contributions from different devices participating in FEL training rounds. Model Watermarking: Embed watermarks within models exchanged during distillation so that any unauthorized attempts at reverse engineering or extracting private data would be traceable back to its source. Adversarial Training: Introduce adversarial components within the network architecture specifically designed to detect and mitigate potential inversion attacks aimed at compromising privacy. By incorporating these strategies along with robust encryption mechanisms and access control policies, privacy protection against inversion attacks can be significantly strengthened in KD-based FEL systems while maintaining effective collaboration between edge devices without compromising data security and confidentiality levels.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star