toplogo
Sign In

Training Machine Learning Models at the Edge: A Comprehensive Survey


Core Concepts
This survey explores various techniques for training machine learning models at the edge, focusing on optimization and efficiency to address resource constraints.
Abstract
This comprehensive survey delves into the optimization of machine learning model training at the edge. It covers a wide range of techniques such as Federated Learning, Split Learning, Knowledge Distillation, and Model Pruning. These methods aim to enhance efficiency, reduce computational demands, and address challenges posed by limited resources in edge devices.
Stats
FL is the dominant approach for training ML models in edge environments. Techniques like Incremental Learning and Transfer Learning are consistently employed but lag behind FL in popularity. Model Compression Techniques such as Quantization and Knowledge Distillation have shown a rise in adoption over the years.
Quotes
"FL enables collaborative training without centralizing sensitive data." "Knowledge Distillation aims to transfer expertise from complex models to simpler ones." "Model Pruning reduces model size by removing certain parts of the model."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Aymen Rayane... at arxiv.org 03-06-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.02619.pdf
Training Machine Learning models at the Edge

Deeper Inquiries

How can Swarm and Gossip Learning be further explored to optimize ML training at the edge?

Swarm and Gossip Learning are relatively less explored techniques compared to Federated Learning in optimizing ML training at the edge. To further explore these methods for optimization, researchers can focus on: Enhancing Communication Efficiency: Develop algorithms that improve communication efficiency between edge devices in Swarm and Gossip Learning setups. This could involve reducing message passing overhead or optimizing network bandwidth usage. Scalability: Investigate ways to scale up Swarm and Gossip Learning approaches for larger networks of edge devices while maintaining performance and efficiency. Privacy Preservation: Explore mechanisms to enhance privacy preservation in Swarm and Gossip Learning by minimizing data exposure during collaborative learning processes. Robustness: Address challenges related to robustness such as handling node failures, ensuring convergence under varying network conditions, and dealing with adversarial attacks.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of relying heavily on Federated Learning for edge optimization?

While Federated Learning (FL) offers significant advantages for edge optimization, there are several drawbacks associated with heavy reliance on this technique: Non-IID Data Challenges: FL may face performance issues when dealing with non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data across edge devices, leading to suboptimal model accuracy. Model Heterogeneity: Variations in device capabilities, network conditions, or data distributions among participating devices can hinder FL's effectiveness due to model heterogeneity. Communication Overhead: The frequent exchange of model updates between devices in FL can result in high communication overheads, impacting latency and bandwidth consumption. Security Concerns: FL raises security risks related to sharing sensitive information during model aggregation phases if not properly secured against malicious attacks or data breaches.

How might advancements in Spiking Neural Networks impact future developments in edge learning techniques?

Advancements in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have the potential to significantly influence future developments in edge learning techniques: Energy Efficiency: SNNs' asynchronous computation nature makes them highly energy-efficient compared to traditional neural networks, making them ideal for resource-constrained edge devices where energy conservation is crucial. Sparse Computations: SNNs operate through sparse computations based on spikes rather than continuous values like conventional neural networks, enabling faster processing speeds while conserving memory resources at the edge. Event-Driven Processing: The event-driven processing paradigm of SNNs allows for real-time processing of sensory inputs without continuous monitoring requirements, facilitating low-latency decision-making suitable for time-sensitive applications at the edge. 4 .On-Device Adaptation: By leveraging SNN's ability for continual learning without catastrophic forgetting , it enables adaptive models that continuously learn from new data streams directly on-edge without requiring extensive retraining off-device. These advancements pave the way for more efficient and adaptive machine learning models tailored specifically for deployment at the network's periphery - enhancing real-time decision-making capabilities while conserving resources efficiently within an Edge Computing environment."
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star