Core Concepts
Computational entanglement contributes to the emergence of adversarial examples in machine learning models.
Abstract
Adversarial examples deceive models with imperceptible input perturbations.
Transferability challenges conventional beliefs about model vulnerabilities.
Non-robust features play a crucial role in adversarial examples.
Linear models exhibit susceptibility to computational entanglement effects.
Adversarial examples can be viewed as artifacts resulting from interactions between systems and the real world.
The model simulates adversaries' ability to construct machine learning models independently.
Computational entanglement leads to perfect correlation or anti-correlation between distant features.
Time dilation and length contraction contribute to the convergence of feature differences.
Information reconciliation is achieved through computational entanglement.
Stats
"Adversarial examples can result from factors beyond non-robust features."
"The angle difference and distances converge towards zero, signifying perfect correlation."
"The Euclidean distance can be either zero or maximum, indicating perfect anti-correlation."
Quotes
"Adversarial examples can indeed be viewed as a unique manifestation of information reconciliation."
"Computational entanglement aligns with relativistic effects such as time dilation and length contraction."