Sign In

CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learning

Core Concepts
CroSel proposes a method leveraging historical predictions to select confident pseudo labels for training examples, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in benchmark datasets.
Introduction to Partial-Label Learning and label ambiguity challenges. CroSel's approach: Cross selection strategy and co-mix consistency regularization. Experimental results showcasing CroSel's superiority in accuracy and selection of true labels. Ablation studies highlighting the importance of each component in CroSel. Parameter analysis, impact of regularization, and comparison between dual and single models. Conclusion on the effectiveness of CroSel in partial-label learning.
"Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on common benchmark datasets." "CroSel consistently outperforms previous methods on benchmark datasets." "CroSel achieves over 90% accuracy and quantity for selecting true labels on CIFAR-type datasets."
"Our main contribution can be summarized as follows: We propose a cross selection strategy to select confident pseudo labels in the candidate label set based on historical prediction." "Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CroSel, which consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Shiyu Tian,H... at 03-28-2024

Deeper Inquiries

How can CroSel's approach be adapted to other weakly supervised learning problems

CroSel's approach can be adapted to other weakly supervised learning problems by leveraging historical predictions to improve the accuracy of label selection. This concept can be applied to tasks where each training example has ambiguous or partial labels, such as semi-supervised learning or noisy label correction. By using a cross selection strategy and consistency regularization, models can learn from each other's predictions and generate more accurate pseudo labels for training. This approach can help in scenarios where obtaining fully labeled data is challenging or expensive, making it applicable to a wide range of weakly supervised learning problems.

What potential limitations or biases could arise from relying on historical predictions for label selection

Relying on historical predictions for label selection in CroSel may introduce potential limitations or biases. One limitation could be the accumulation of errors over time if the initial predictions are incorrect. This could lead to a compounding effect where subsequent selections are based on inaccurate historical data. Additionally, there is a risk of model drift if the underlying data distribution changes significantly over time, impacting the relevance of historical predictions. Biases may arise if the historical predictions are skewed towards certain classes or patterns, leading to a reinforcement of those biases in the label selection process. It is essential to monitor and adjust the historical data storage and selection criteria to mitigate these limitations and biases.

How might the concept of cross selection be applied in a seemingly unrelated field but still yield valuable insights

The concept of cross selection, as seen in CroSel, can be applied in the field of financial risk management to enhance risk identification and mitigation strategies. By using multiple models to select risk factors or indicators for each other, financial institutions can improve the accuracy of risk assessments and decision-making processes. This cross selection approach can help in identifying potential risks that may not be apparent when using a single model or traditional risk assessment methods. By leveraging historical predictions and ensemble learning techniques, financial institutions can enhance their risk management practices and adapt to changing market conditions more effectively.